150 to 1
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Shocking! (was Re: Another unruly player
Next: Fatty
From: Carbon on 23 May 2010 20:01 On Sun, 23 May 2010 19:24:41 -0400, William Clark wrote: > In article <lloydparsons-D54062.16135923052010(a)port80.individual.net>, > Lloyd Parsons <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: >> In article <MPG.26633416c2ddb11989f94(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR >> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>> In article <wclark2-FE4753.11443923052010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >>> >>>> The evidence has already been produced a thousand times. Grow up >>>> and move on. >>> >>> It doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it >>> true. The original birth certificate has not been made public. In >>> fact Dr. Chiyome Fukino stated "I, Dr. Chiyome Fukion, director of >>> the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the oritinal vital >>> records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health >>> verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a >>> natural-borh American citizen." This means there is a record that >>> predates the certificate of live birth that was presented in 2008. >>> >>> It will be interesting to see if Obama stands for re-election in >>> 2012. There is a state that requires proof of that you satisfy the >>> reqirements to hold the office of President of the US. And, those >>> requirements can only be sastisfied with an original birth >>> certificaite, not a computer generated one. >> >> In a word, bullshit! What has been produced is all that is needed. >> But just keep on making this non-issue into an issue the nutjobs can >> get off on, and the rest of us will make informed decisions about who >> gets elected/reelected. > > Yup, another fifteen "undecideds" just fled the GoP at the thought of > loons like this taking over. Isn't there anyone in the Republican high command that can figure out that there aren't enough loons to win the election?
From: Howard Brazee on 24 May 2010 07:40 On Mon, 24 May 2010 05:48:21 -0500, Horvath(a)net.net wrote: >>His mother said that? I'd like to see a cite. The evidence of his >>birth in Hawaii is that the republican governor of that state said he >>was born there and had a valid birth certificate to prove it. You >>think she's lying? > > >I guess that clears up everything. I never heard of a politician who >would lie. Lying is to help them, not the leader of the opposition. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: Howard Brazee on 24 May 2010 20:42 On Mon, 24 May 2010 11:18:15 -0400, William Clark <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote: >You mean you don't know? But yet you are presuming that Obama was not >vetted. Brilliant. Do you suppose that he would be allowed access to >military intelligence and secrets without clearance? Then you are nuts. By definition, the president is allowed such access. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison
From: William Clark on 24 May 2010 21:06 In article <v47mv51q6ibdca5ahrig22kcel3h90hr0f(a)4ax.com>, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2010 11:18:15 -0400, William Clark > <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > > >You mean you don't know? But yet you are presuming that Obama was not > >vetted. Brilliant. Do you suppose that he would be allowed access to > >military intelligence and secrets without clearance? Then you are nuts. > > By definition, the president is allowed such access. But would never have been allowed to get so far as to run for nomination or President unless his background was clean.
From: Howard Brazee on 24 May 2010 22:36
On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:06:48 -0400, William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: >> >You mean you don't know? But yet you are presuming that Obama was not >> >vetted. Brilliant. Do you suppose that he would be allowed access to >> >military intelligence and secrets without clearance? Then you are nuts. >> >> By definition, the president is allowed such access. > >But would never have been allowed to get so far as to run for nomination >or President unless his background was clean. Someone would have seen an opportunity for political gain by publicizing such unfitness, but the legal requirements to run are explicit. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |