Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 14:58 "zox625" <a46668(a)webnntp.invalid> wrote in message news:cklbi7xucu.ln2(a)recgroups.com... > On Jul 28 2010 3:00 PM, William Clark wrote: > >> > >> > And what part precisely of my post do you think this disagrees with? >> >> The impression you are trying to create that Obama is responsible for >> unemployment rising to 10% levels, and that all was peachy when Dubya >> left office. > > Sheesh. Your precious Obama was the one that PROMISED that unemployment > wouldn't go over 8% if his stimulus package was put into place. HE was > already taking credit/blame for the results. Why can't you? > > It is stunning how nearly every leftwinger has the exact same two > arguments whenever Obama and his policies are criticized: > > 1) But, but, but.... Bush got us into this mess. > > 2) But, but, but.... Bush did bad things, too. > > Exactly how many years of this administration must pass before Obama takes > the blame for anything? > Obamas failed administration will be blamed on Bush for all eternity.
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:06 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:53:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >news:4c531ca1$0$15177$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> Wow, you are so completely and totally wrong. Breitbart and Palin are >> known loons who will never be taken seriously by anyone but the far >> right of the Republican party. I actually want them to be first thing >> that pops into the heads of moderates when they think of the Republican >> party, especially during election season. Go Sarah! Go Anthony! > >It's Andrew actually. Obama is already running off the moderates in droves. > You really are dreaming Mike. Why do you just follow the party line thought? BK
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:11 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:26:36 -0700, "zox625" <a46668(a)webnntp.invalid> wrote: >On Jul 28 2010 3:00 PM, William Clark wrote: > >> > >> > And what part precisely of my post do you think this disagrees with? >> >> The impression you are trying to create that Obama is responsible for >> unemployment rising to 10% levels, and that all was peachy when Dubya >> left office. > >Sheesh. Your precious Obama was the one that PROMISED that unemployment >wouldn't go over 8% if his stimulus package was put into place. HE was >already taking credit/blame for the results. Why can't you? > >It is stunning how nearly every leftwinger has the exact same two >arguments whenever Obama and his policies are criticized: > >1) But, but, but.... Bush got us into this mess. > >2) But, but, but.... Bush did bad things, too. > >Exactly how many years of this administration must pass before Obama takes >the blame for anything? > 8, just like any administration. BK
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 15:22 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:qk86565lh0qgaviqbfjacf1jikvlp0cast(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:53:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >>"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>news:4c531ca1$0$15177$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >>> Wow, you are so completely and totally wrong. Breitbart and Palin are >>> known loons who will never be taken seriously by anyone but the far >>> right of the Republican party. I actually want them to be first thing >>> that pops into the heads of moderates when they think of the Republican >>> party, especially during election season. Go Sarah! Go Anthony! >> >>It's Andrew actually. Obama is already running off the moderates in >>droves. >> > > You really are dreaming Mike. Why do you just follow the party line > thought? > I follow the polls. And you're one to talk about party lines.
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 15:25
<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:ft86561jpdbdml7bkqofhsjv287i51vkhi(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:26:36 -0700, "zox625" <a46668(a)webnntp.invalid> > wrote: > >>On Jul 28 2010 3:00 PM, William Clark wrote: >> >>> > >>> > And what part precisely of my post do you think this disagrees with? >>> >>> The impression you are trying to create that Obama is responsible for >>> unemployment rising to 10% levels, and that all was peachy when Dubya >>> left office. >> >>Sheesh. Your precious Obama was the one that PROMISED that unemployment >>wouldn't go over 8% if his stimulus package was put into place. HE was >>already taking credit/blame for the results. Why can't you? >> >>It is stunning how nearly every leftwinger has the exact same two >>arguments whenever Obama and his policies are criticized: >> >>1) But, but, but.... Bush got us into this mess. >> >>2) But, but, but.... Bush did bad things, too. >> >>Exactly how many years of this administration must pass before Obama takes >>the blame for anything? >> > > 8, just like any administration. > > BK He aint gonna make 8. |