A British Open Double Bogey
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:28 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:21:37 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> >> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the mess, >> hasn't. He's an idiot. >> >Breitbarts target was the NAACP, not Sherrod. She made the statements. > Try to watch this without your mind being closed and see where the origins of the problem were. http://www.google.com/search?q=shirley+sherrod&hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&prmd=nuvo&source=univ&tbs=nws:1&tbo=u&ei=mlBITJDrMIS8lQeUlZyiCw&sa=X&oi=news_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQsQQwAA BK
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:32 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:22:42 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:qk86565lh0qgaviqbfjacf1jikvlp0cast(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:53:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>news:4c531ca1$0$15177$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >>>> Wow, you are so completely and totally wrong. Breitbart and Palin are >>>> known loons who will never be taken seriously by anyone but the far >>>> right of the Republican party. I actually want them to be first thing >>>> that pops into the heads of moderates when they think of the Republican >>>> party, especially during election season. Go Sarah! Go Anthony! >>> >>>It's Andrew actually. Obama is already running off the moderates in >>>droves. >>> >> >> You really are dreaming Mike. Why do you just follow the party line >> thought? >> >I follow the polls. And you're one to talk about party lines. > Damned straight I am. I don't vote, or think either, party line. You, on the other hand, have nothing but one way political thought as evidenced here. BK
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 15:37 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:iv9656ho9m5hljdkt6ksvh34j886u9ghku(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:22:42 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:qk86565lh0qgaviqbfjacf1jikvlp0cast(a)4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:53:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>news:4c531ca1$0$15177$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> >>>>> Wow, you are so completely and totally wrong. Breitbart and Palin are >>>>> known loons who will never be taken seriously by anyone but the far >>>>> right of the Republican party. I actually want them to be first thing >>>>> that pops into the heads of moderates when they think of the >>>>> Republican >>>>> party, especially during election season. Go Sarah! Go Anthony! >>>> >>>>It's Andrew actually. Obama is already running off the moderates in >>>>droves. >>>> >>> >>> You really are dreaming Mike. Why do you just follow the party line >>> thought? >>> >>I follow the polls. And you're one to talk about party lines. >> > Damned straight I am. I don't vote, or think either, party line. > > You, on the other hand, have nothing but one way political thought as > evidenced here. > > BK Right Bobby. Your words don't match your rhetoric.
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:39 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:25:11 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:ft86561jpdbdml7bkqofhsjv287i51vkhi(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:26:36 -0700, "zox625" <a46668(a)webnntp.invalid> >> wrote: >>>Exactly how many years of this administration must pass before Obama takes >>>the blame for anything? >>> >> >> 8, just like any administration. >> >> BK > >He aint gonna make 8. > Damn, isn't it wonderful to have ESP? Again, you're just showing you wishes. Unless the GOP comes up with a viable slate, he just may. BK
From: John B. on 30 Jul 2010 15:42
On Jul 30, 3:26 pm, "zox625" <a46...(a)webnntp.invalid> wrote: > On Jul 28 2010 3:00 PM, William Clark wrote: > > > > > > And what part precisely of my post do you think this disagrees with? > > > The impression you are trying to create that Obama is responsible for > > unemployment rising to 10% levels, and that all was peachy when Dubya > > left office. > > Sheesh. Your precious Obama was the one that PROMISED that unemployment > wouldn't go over 8% if his stimulus package was put into place. HE was > already taking credit/blame for the results. Why can't you? > > It is stunning how nearly every leftwinger has the exact same two > arguments whenever Obama and his policies are criticized: > > 1) But, but, but.... Bush got us into this mess. > > 2) But, but, but.... Bush did bad things, too. > > Exactly how many years of this administration must pass before Obama takes > the blame for anything? > How many years must pass before Republicans stop blaming FDR for starting the "era of big government?" They haven't exactly made it any smaller. As for Bush, is there a date certain by which his horrendous screw-ups and stupidity cease having any effect? If so, you seem to think it's already passed. |