A British Open Double Bogey
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:42 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:iv9656ho9m5hljdkt6ksvh34j886u9ghku(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:22:42 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>news:qk86565lh0qgaviqbfjacf1jikvlp0cast(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:53:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:4c531ca1$0$15177$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> >>>>>> Wow, you are so completely and totally wrong. Breitbart and Palin are >>>>>> known loons who will never be taken seriously by anyone but the far >>>>>> right of the Republican party. I actually want them to be first thing >>>>>> that pops into the heads of moderates when they think of the >>>>>> Republican >>>>>> party, especially during election season. Go Sarah! Go Anthony! >>>>> >>>>>It's Andrew actually. Obama is already running off the moderates in >>>>>droves. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You really are dreaming Mike. Why do you just follow the party line >>>> thought? >>>> >>>I follow the polls. And you're one to talk about party lines. >>> >> Damned straight I am. I don't vote, or think either, party line. >> >> You, on the other hand, have nothing but one way political thought as >> evidenced here. >> >> BK > >Right Bobby. Your words don't match your rhetoric. > What a laugh. My words ARE rhetoric. You need a dictionary. Do you mean my words don't match my actions? What the hell do you know about my actions? Nothing. >
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:45 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:42:27 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: >In article <8bgo0iFaphU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> > You mean "She made the statements that Breitbart deliberately >> > distorted", don't you? >> > >> Breitbart didn't distort anything. > >Yes. He did. > >Editing a video so that you leave out information that totally changes >its meaning is distortion. There's no way to get the far right to view anything without an un jaundiced eye. "None so blind...." you know. BK
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 15:46 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:cs96565pcht63vii7n6ufcncmpdil3l6k4(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:21:37 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >>>> >>> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the mess, >>> hasn't. He's an idiot. >>> >>Breitbarts target was the NAACP, not Sherrod. She made the statements. >> > Try to watch this without your mind being closed and see where the > origins of the problem were. > > http://www.google.com/search?q=shirley+sherrod&hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&prmd=nuvo&source=univ&tbs=nws:1&tbo=u&ei=mlBITJDrMIS8lQeUlZyiCw&sa=X&oi=news_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQsQQwAA > > BK Did you see the video posted on Breitbarts site?
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 15:52 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:3ka656pd3g5igp3s7c5tevo6nff6d5b2qa(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:iv9656ho9m5hljdkt6ksvh34j886u9ghku(a)4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:22:42 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>>news:qk86565lh0qgaviqbfjacf1jikvlp0cast(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:53:33 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:4c531ca1$0$15177$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>> >>>>>>> Wow, you are so completely and totally wrong. Breitbart and Palin >>>>>>> are >>>>>>> known loons who will never be taken seriously by anyone but the far >>>>>>> right of the Republican party. I actually want them to be first >>>>>>> thing >>>>>>> that pops into the heads of moderates when they think of the >>>>>>> Republican >>>>>>> party, especially during election season. Go Sarah! Go Anthony! >>>>>> >>>>>>It's Andrew actually. Obama is already running off the moderates in >>>>>>droves. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You really are dreaming Mike. Why do you just follow the party line >>>>> thought? >>>>> >>>>I follow the polls. And you're one to talk about party lines. >>>> >>> Damned straight I am. I don't vote, or think either, party line. >>> >>> You, on the other hand, have nothing but one way political thought as >>> evidenced here. >>> >>> BK >> >>Right Bobby. Your words don't match your rhetoric. >> > What a laugh. My words ARE rhetoric. You need a dictionary. > > Do you mean my words don't match my actions? What the hell do you > know about my actions? > > Nothing. >> You are just as party line as anyone else here.
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:53
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:46:15 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:cs96565pcht63vii7n6ufcncmpdil3l6k4(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:21:37 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >>>> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the mess, >>>> hasn't. He's an idiot. >>>> >>>Breitbarts target was the NAACP, not Sherrod. She made the statements. >>> >> Try to watch this without your mind being closed and see where the >> origins of the problem were. >> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=shirley+sherrod&hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&prmd=nuvo&source=univ&tbs=nws:1&tbo=u&ei=mlBITJDrMIS8lQeUlZyiCw&sa=X&oi=news_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQsQQwAA >> >> BK > >Did you see the video posted on Breitbarts site? > Not on his site, but on news sites. Obviously Sherrod saw them too or she wouldn't even think about suing him. BK |