Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 15:56 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:dra656dounn78rv7lt2qppvaa6sbkal8tl(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:42:27 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > wrote: > >>In article <8bgo0iFaphU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > You mean "She made the statements that Breitbart deliberately >>> > distorted", don't you? >>> > >>> Breitbart didn't distort anything. >> >>Yes. He did. >> >>Editing a video so that you leave out information that totally changes >>its meaning is distortion. > > > There's no way to get the far right to view anything without an un > jaundiced eye. "None so blind...." you know. > > BK > Perhaps you two should see it for yourselves. http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/07/19/video-proof-the-naacp-awards-racism2010/
From: bknight on 30 Jul 2010 15:57 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:52:27 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >news:3ka656pd3g5igp3s7c5tevo6nff6d5b2qa(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> wrote: >>>> You, on the other hand, have nothing but one way political thought as >>>> evidenced here. >>>> >>>> BK >>> >>>Right Bobby. Your words don't match your rhetoric. >>> >> What a laugh. My words ARE rhetoric. You need a dictionary. >> >> Do you mean my words don't match my actions? What the hell do you >> know about my actions? >> >> Nothing. >>> > >You are just as party line as anyone else here. Only to you and Moderate. I vote split tickets and even supported Bush when he was in office. I wanted him to be effective, he just wasn't. He was a joke. As I said, you seem to want Obama to fail more than you want the country to recover. That's extreme right wing. BK
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 15:59 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:ega656t9j7knfb028ii6elureuscerdr9t(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:25:11 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:ft86561jpdbdml7bkqofhsjv287i51vkhi(a)4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:26:36 -0700, "zox625" <a46668(a)webnntp.invalid> >>> wrote: > >>>>Exactly how many years of this administration must pass before Obama >>>>takes >>>>the blame for anything? >>>> >>> >>> 8, just like any administration. >>> >>> BK >> >>He aint gonna make 8. >> > > Damn, isn't it wonderful to have ESP? Again, you're just showing you > wishes. Unless the GOP comes up with a viable slate, he just may. > > BK True. If they are dumb enough to run Palin again, Obama gets another 4. And guess what, it's just a big a wish when you stated "8, just like any administration".
From: Alan Baker on 30 Jul 2010 16:02 In article <8bgp49Fhh5U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:dra656dounn78rv7lt2qppvaa6sbkal8tl(a)4ax.com... > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:42:27 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > > wrote: > > > >>In article <8bgo0iFaphU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >>> > > >>> > You mean "She made the statements that Breitbart deliberately > >>> > distorted", don't you? > >>> > > >>> Breitbart didn't distort anything. > >> > >>Yes. He did. > >> > >>Editing a video so that you leave out information that totally changes > >>its meaning is distortion. > > > > > > There's no way to get the far right to view anything without an un > > jaundiced eye. "None so blind...." you know. > > > > BK > > > Perhaps you two should see it for yourselves. > > http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/07/19/video-proof-the-naacp-awards-ra > cism2010/ Perhaps you should realize that that is not a video of her entire speech and even Breitbart now admits it was a distortion of her actions: "Correction: While Ms. Sherrod made the remarks captured in the first video featured in this post while she held a federally appointed position, the story she tells refers to actions she took before she held that federal position." The full video is 43 minutes long. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk> Don't you think a real journalist would have reviewed that before putting up cherry-picked sections of it and passing judgement? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: MNMikeW on 30 Jul 2010 16:02
<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:mfb656lnn3k6l3kud0kfmufbuia7740k81(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:52:27 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:3ka656pd3g5igp3s7c5tevo6nff6d5b2qa(a)4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: > >>>>> You, on the other hand, have nothing but one way political thought as >>>>> evidenced here. >>>>> >>>>> BK >>>> >>>>Right Bobby. Your words don't match your rhetoric. >>>> >>> What a laugh. My words ARE rhetoric. You need a dictionary. >>> >>> Do you mean my words don't match my actions? What the hell do you >>> know about my actions? >>> >>> Nothing. >>>> >> >>You are just as party line as anyone else here. > > Only to you and Moderate. I vote split tickets and even supported > Bush when he was in office. I wanted him to be effective, he just > wasn't. He was a joke. > > As I said, you seem to want Obama to fail more than you want the > country to recover. That's extreme right wing. > No Bobby you just don't get it. People want the country to recover. The majority of us don't think Obama is going to get us there. Hopefully he proves us wrong, but I just cant see it right now. |