A British Open Double Bogey
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: William Clark on 31 Jul 2010 12:33 In article <8bgpfgFjmcU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:mfb656lnn3k6l3kud0kfmufbuia7740k81(a)4ax.com... > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:52:27 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>news:3ka656pd3g5igp3s7c5tevo6nff6d5b2qa(a)4ax.com... > >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>> You, on the other hand, have nothing but one way political thought as > >>>>> evidenced here. > >>>>> > >>>>> BK > >>>> > >>>>Right Bobby. Your words don't match your rhetoric. > >>>> > >>> What a laugh. My words ARE rhetoric. You need a dictionary. > >>> > >>> Do you mean my words don't match my actions? What the hell do you > >>> know about my actions? > >>> > >>> Nothing. > >>>> > >> > >>You are just as party line as anyone else here. > > > > Only to you and Moderate. I vote split tickets and even supported > > Bush when he was in office. I wanted him to be effective, he just > > wasn't. He was a joke. > > > > As I said, you seem to want Obama to fail more than you want the > > country to recover. That's extreme right wing. > > > No Bobby you just don't get it. People want the country to recover. The > majority of us don't think Obama is going to get us there. Hopefully he > proves us wrong, but I just cant see it right now. "Hopefully he proves us wrong"? Don't make me laugh - you and the rest of the wingnuts are devastated at the prospect of that happening.
From: William Clark on 31 Jul 2010 12:42 In article <MPG.26bd1fd6d79af2ab98a156(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <aij6569cpam0ad72mac777mo5cqji2gjen(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > >> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the mess, > > >> hasn't. He's an idiot. > > > > > >Has every press outlet apologized for each and every mistake they have > > >ever made? No. > > > > > Thanks for admitting he made a mistake. > > I made no such admission. I asked a question and answered the question. > > > >Stop acting like a spoiled child. > > > > Wanting someone to own up is acting like a spoiled child? > > Oh, its Bert. I forgot. > > You are forgetting that the press cherry picks bits and pieces of > interviews and videos to bias what they present each and every day. The > fact that you won't admit that this SOP is laughable. So is Breitbart a deliberate liar or not? Simple moral question - yes or no will do.
From: William Clark on 31 Jul 2010 12:43 In article <hrl65610tslk3f90vtqiboancnsge9g7jn(a)4ax.com>, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:44:27 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >In article <aij6569cpam0ad72mac777mo5cqji2gjen(a)4ax.com>, > >bknight(a)conramp.net says... > >> >> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the mess, > >> >> hasn't. He's an idiot. > >> > > >> >Has every press outlet apologized for each and every mistake they have > >> >ever made? No. > >> > > >> Thanks for admitting he made a mistake. > > > >I made no such admission. I asked a question and answered the question. > > > >> >Stop acting like a spoiled child. > >> > >> Wanting someone to own up is acting like a spoiled child? > >> Oh, its Bert. I forgot. > > > >You are forgetting that the press cherry picks bits and pieces of > >interviews and videos to bias what they present each and every day. The > >fact that you won't admit that this SOP is laughable. > > > > > What's laughable is that you obviously aren't smart enough to even > discuss this. Bert the Shallow jumps in after the points are made. > > BK He doesn't WANT to discuss this, because it is yet another disgusting piece of deliberate distortion from his heroes on the far right.
From: William Clark on 31 Jul 2010 12:48 In article <8bgpp7FlhfU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:3db65615cpe39s1qjhqr94pvjppkrdpn6n(a)4ax.com... > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:46:15 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >>news:cs96565pcht63vii7n6ufcncmpdil3l6k4(a)4ax.com... > >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:21:37 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the mess, > >>>>> hasn't. He's an idiot. > >>>>> > >>>>Breitbarts target was the NAACP, not Sherrod. She made the statements. > >>>> > >>> Try to watch this without your mind being closed and see where the > >>> origins of the problem were. > >>> > >>> http://www.google.com/search?q=shirley+sherrod&hl=en&safe=off&client=safar > >>> i&rls=en&prmd=nuvo&source=univ&tbs=nws:1&tbo=u&ei=mlBITJDrMIS8lQeUlZyiCw&s > >>> a=X&oi=news_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQsQQwAA > >>> > >>> BK > >> > >>Did you see the video posted on Breitbarts site? > >> > > Not on his site, but on news sites. Obviously Sherrod saw them too or > > she wouldn't even think about suing him. > > > Well if you saw what Breitbart had posted, you would have seen that it > included the part where she said she had the revelation that it wasn't about > black and white. She has no case. Yes, well that has been posted since his weaseling came to light. he doesn't even have the balls to stand by what he did.
From: William Clark on 31 Jul 2010 12:51
In article <4c536b4e$0$4970$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:37:55 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > news:alangbaker-C06CE9.13143130072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> In article <8bgpttFmcfU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > >> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >>> news:alangbaker-EDCC5B.13025030072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >>> > >>>> The full video is 43 minutes long. > >>>> > >>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk> > >>>> > >>>> Don't you think a real journalist would have reviewed that before > >>>> putting up cherry-picked sections of it and passing judgement? > >>> > >>> What makes you think he didn't have the whole video? > >> > >> If he did, that makes his actions even worse, because it has been > >> pretty much universally agreed that anyone who has seen the whole > >> video could never have made the claims of racism that Breitbart made. > >> > >> You're really digging yourself a hole here, Mike, and for what? > >> > > I not digging anything. Breitbart is attempting to show racism at the > > NAACP, not specifically to Sherrod. Whether you think he does or does > > not accomplish this is debatable. > > He was attempting to smear the NAACP, not "show racism." Look at his > deliberately misleading excerpt. Then look at the full video. Unless > you're totally demented you'll be able to see what he did. I think you've hit the nail on the head with the "demented" bit :-) |