A British Open Double Bogey
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: BAR on 31 Jul 2010 13:36 In article <wclark2-24C74C.12303731072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > >> > So what color is the sky in your world? America didn't want the scum > > >> > here. > > >> > Obama listened. A first for him. > > >> > > >> Are they worse scum than the rapists and child molesters that we > > >> incarcerate here? > > > > > > Or Anthony Breitbart? > > > > Another person who scares the libs as much as Palin. > > No, another person that the left would LOVE to keep front and center, > just like Eskimo Barbie. The longer the GoP looks as though it is > hitched to them, the longer they stay out of power. Why are the British now de-centralizing and privatizing health services delivery? Could it be that the left has been wrong about command and control of vast swaths of the economy?
From: BAR on 31 Jul 2010 13:42 In article <wclark2-479852.12420731072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > In article <MPG.26bd1fd6d79af2ab98a156(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <aij6569cpam0ad72mac777mo5cqji2gjen(a)4ax.com>, > > bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > > >> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the mess, > > > >> hasn't. He's an idiot. > > > > > > > >Has every press outlet apologized for each and every mistake they have > > > >ever made? No. > > > > > > > Thanks for admitting he made a mistake. > > > > I made no such admission. I asked a question and answered the question. > > > > > >Stop acting like a spoiled child. > > > > > > Wanting someone to own up is acting like a spoiled child? > > > Oh, its Bert. I forgot. > > > > You are forgetting that the press cherry picks bits and pieces of > > interviews and videos to bias what they present each and every day. The > > fact that you won't admit that this SOP is laughable. > > So is Breitbart a deliberate liar or not? Simple moral question - yes or > no will do. Breitbart is a publisher and he made a business decision just like the NYT, WaPo and other media outlets. Judgement on Breitbart's using your moral question is irrelevant. Remember, government censor, businesses make decisions.
From: BAR on 31 Jul 2010 13:43 In article <wclark2-5C18F7.12513931072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > In article <4c536b4e$0$4970$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:37:55 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > news:alangbaker-C06CE9.13143130072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > >> In article <8bgpttFmcfU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" > > >> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > >>> news:alangbaker-EDCC5B.13025030072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > >>> > > >>>> The full video is 43 minutes long. > > >>>> > > >>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk> > > >>>> > > >>>> Don't you think a real journalist would have reviewed that before > > >>>> putting up cherry-picked sections of it and passing judgement? > > >>> > > >>> What makes you think he didn't have the whole video? > > >> > > >> If he did, that makes his actions even worse, because it has been > > >> pretty much universally agreed that anyone who has seen the whole > > >> video could never have made the claims of racism that Breitbart made. > > >> > > >> You're really digging yourself a hole here, Mike, and for what? > > >> > > > I not digging anything. Breitbart is attempting to show racism at the > > > NAACP, not specifically to Sherrod. Whether you think he does or does > > > not accomplish this is debatable. > > > > He was attempting to smear the NAACP, not "show racism." Look at his > > deliberately misleading excerpt. Then look at the full video. Unless > > you're totally demented you'll be able to see what he did. > > I think you've hit the nail on the head with the "demented" bit :-) By definition the NAACP is a racist organization.
From: dene on 31 Jul 2010 13:54 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4c542eaa$0$4990$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > Greg, I know how you feel about Reagan and I concede that he was a > convincing issuer of platitudes and was very popular throughout his > Presidency. This was partly because the scandals, such as the > Iran-Contra affair, never seemed to stick to him. Now, why was that? > IMHO, it was because when he went to the Hill and said "I don't know," > and "I don't recall," all those hundreds of times, they believed him. I have a better answer. America didn't care. In of itself, ripping off the Iranians to support the Contras wasn't that bad of an idea. In terms of an outstanding presidency, it was a bump in the road. -Greg
From: dene on 31 Jul 2010 13:56
"BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message news:MPG.26be08094943135398a15f(a)news.giganews.com... > And, superstition is more widely believed and adhered to around the > world than science. Ask any baseball player. Golfers too. -Greg |