Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: BAR on 1 Aug 2010 08:17 In article <alangbaker-15E2AB.23062231072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > In article <8bjv3hFufjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:wclark2-DBCC9B.17523931072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <8bj66lFm27U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > > > > news:MPG.26be08094943135398a15f(a)news.giganews.com... > > > > > > > > > And, superstition is more widely believed and adhered to around the > > > > > world than science. > > > > > > > > Ask any baseball player. Golfers too. > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > No, their superstition does not contribute to their ability at the game, > > > just to how they calm their nerves. > > > > It's belief. I didn't claim there was in validity. It's a shot in the > > dark, like atheistic evolution. > > > > -Greg > > LOL > > Evolution is not atheistic or theistic, Greg. It simply is. Evolution is a theory.
From: BAR on 1 Aug 2010 08:22 In article <alangbaker-C2904A.23124331072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > > > > > > > Breitbart is a publisher and he made a business decision just like the > > > > NYT, WaPo and other media outlets. > > > > > > > > Judgement on Breitbart's using your moral question is irrelevant. > > > > > > > > Remember, government censor, businesses make decisions. > > > > > > So did he lie with the intention of misrepresenting the NAACP and Ms. > > > Sherrod or not? Simple question. Have the cojones to answer it. > > > > He made a business decision. > > So you *don't* have the cojones. > What specifically are you acusing Breitbart of lying about.
From: Alan Baker on 1 Aug 2010 08:35 In article <MPG.26bf2fc2b4d462cb98a173(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <4c54ee80$0$4970$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:40:52 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > In article <wclark2-513B7C.17363431072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > >> In article <MPG.26be2a79e87bedb698a163(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR > > >> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >>> In article <wclark2-479852.12420731072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > >>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > >>> > > >>>> So is Breitbart a deliberate liar or not? Simple moral question - > > >>>> yes or no will do. > > >>> > > >>> Breitbart is a publisher and he made a business decision just like > > >>> the NYT, WaPo and other media outlets. > > >>> > > >>> Judgement on Breitbart's using your moral question is irrelevant. > > >>> > > >>> Remember, government censor, businesses make decisions. > > >> > > >> So did he lie with the intention of misrepresenting the NAACP and Ms. > > >> Sherrod or not? Simple question. Have the cojones to answer it. > > > > > > He made a business decision. > > > > ...to tell a lie. > > Sherrod's own words are not a lie. Sherrod's own words twisted and taken out of context are a lie told by Breitbart. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 1 Aug 2010 08:36 In article <MPG.26bf2ff0ab24ec6798a174(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <alangbaker-15E2AB.23062231072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > > > In article <8bjv3hFufjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > > news:wclark2-DBCC9B.17523931072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > In article <8bj66lFm27U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:MPG.26be08094943135398a15f(a)news.giganews.com... > > > > > > > > > > > And, superstition is more widely believed and adhered to around the > > > > > > world than science. > > > > > > > > > > Ask any baseball player. Golfers too. > > > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > > > No, their superstition does not contribute to their ability at the game, > > > > just to how they calm their nerves. > > > > > > It's belief. I didn't claim there was in validity. It's a shot in the > > > dark, like atheistic evolution. > > > > > > -Greg > > > > LOL > > > > Evolution is not atheistic or theistic, Greg. It simply is. > > Evolution is a theory. Correct. I'd say at this point it is a theory that is a close to proven as any theory can ever be, but it is still a theory. However, it is neither atheistic nor theistic. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: BAR on 1 Aug 2010 09:04
In article <alangbaker-C02771.05355401082010(a)news.shawcable.com>, alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > In article <MPG.26bf2fc2b4d462cb98a173(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <4c54ee80$0$4970$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > > > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:40:52 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > > In article <wclark2-513B7C.17363431072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > >> In article <MPG.26be2a79e87bedb698a163(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR > > > >> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > >>> In article <wclark2-479852.12420731072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > >>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > >>> > > > >>>> So is Breitbart a deliberate liar or not? Simple moral question - > > > >>>> yes or no will do. > > > >>> > > > >>> Breitbart is a publisher and he made a business decision just like > > > >>> the NYT, WaPo and other media outlets. > > > >>> > > > >>> Judgement on Breitbart's using your moral question is irrelevant. > > > >>> > > > >>> Remember, government censor, businesses make decisions. > > > >> > > > >> So did he lie with the intention of misrepresenting the NAACP and Ms. > > > >> Sherrod or not? Simple question. Have the cojones to answer it. > > > > > > > > He made a business decision. > > > > > > ...to tell a lie. > > > > Sherrod's own words are not a lie. > > Sherrod's own words twisted and taken out of context are a lie told by > Breitbart. You really do need to take a look at your argument again. You are digging yourself into a hole. |