A British Open Double Bogey
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: Carbon on 1 Aug 2010 09:06 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:16:57 -0400, BAR wrote: > In article <4c54ee80$0$4970$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:40:52 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> In article <wclark2-513B7C.17363431072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >>>> In article <MPG.26be2a79e87bedb698a163(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR >>>> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >>>>> In article <wclark2-479852.12420731072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- >>>>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... >>>>> >>>>>> So is Breitbart a deliberate liar or not? Simple moral question - >>>>>> yes or no will do. >>>>> >>>>> Breitbart is a publisher and he made a business decision just like >>>>> the NYT, WaPo and other media outlets. >>>>> >>>>> Judgement on Breitbart's using your moral question is irrelevant. >>>>> >>>>> Remember, government censor, businesses make decisions. >>>> >>>> So did he lie with the intention of misrepresenting the NAACP and >>>> Ms. Sherrod or not? Simple question. Have the cojones to answer it. >>> >>> He made a business decision. >> >> ...to tell a lie. > > Sherrod's own words are not a lie. Breitbart's crime is obvious and no one will ever buy his bullshit again. Not much of a businessman, is he?
From: BAR on 1 Aug 2010 09:07 In article <alangbaker-27495F.05365101082010(a)news.shawcable.com>, alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > In article <MPG.26bf2ff0ab24ec6798a174(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <alangbaker-15E2AB.23062231072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > > alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > > > > > In article <8bjv3hFufjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > news:wclark2-DBCC9B.17523931072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > > In article <8bj66lFm27U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:MPG.26be08094943135398a15f(a)news.giganews.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > And, superstition is more widely believed and adhered to around the > > > > > > > world than science. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ask any baseball player. Golfers too. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > > > > > No, their superstition does not contribute to their ability at the game, > > > > > just to how they calm their nerves. > > > > > > > > It's belief. I didn't claim there was in validity. It's a shot in the > > > > dark, like atheistic evolution. > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > LOL > > > > > > Evolution is not atheistic or theistic, Greg. It simply is. > > > > Evolution is a theory. > > Correct. I'd say at this point it is a theory that is a close to proven > as any theory can ever be, but it is still a theory. > > However, it is neither atheistic nor theistic. According to Science a theory cannot never become a certanty. The F word always comes into play when it comes down to the nunts and bolts.
From: Carbon on 1 Aug 2010 09:10 On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:17:38 -0400, BAR wrote: > In article <alangbaker-15E2AB.23062231072010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > alangbaker(a)telus.net says... >> In article <8bjv3hFufjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >>> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:wclark2-DBCC9B.17523931072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>> In article <8bj66lFm27U1(a)mid.individual.net>, >>>> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >>>>> "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:MPG.26be08094943135398a15f(a)news.giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>>> And, superstition is more widely believed and adhered to around >>>>>> the world than science. >>>>> >>>>> Ask any baseball player. Golfers too. >>>> >>>> No, their superstition does not contribute to their ability at the >>>> game, just to how they calm their nerves. >>> >>> It's belief. I didn't claim there was in validity. It's a shot in >>> the dark, like atheistic evolution. >> >> LOL >> >> Evolution is not atheistic or theistic, Greg. It simply is. > > Evolution is a theory. So is gravity. Your point?
From: BAR on 1 Aug 2010 09:25 In article <4c55714c$0$15824$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:16:57 -0400, BAR wrote: > > In article <4c54ee80$0$4970$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:40:52 -0400, BAR wrote: > >>> In article <wclark2-513B7C.17363431072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >>>> In article <MPG.26be2a79e87bedb698a163(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR > >>>> <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >>>>> In article <wclark2-479852.12420731072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > >>>>> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > >>>>> > >>>>>> So is Breitbart a deliberate liar or not? Simple moral question - > >>>>>> yes or no will do. > >>>>> > >>>>> Breitbart is a publisher and he made a business decision just like > >>>>> the NYT, WaPo and other media outlets. > >>>>> > >>>>> Judgement on Breitbart's using your moral question is irrelevant. > >>>>> > >>>>> Remember, government censor, businesses make decisions. > >>>> > >>>> So did he lie with the intention of misrepresenting the NAACP and > >>>> Ms. Sherrod or not? Simple question. Have the cojones to answer it. > >>> > >>> He made a business decision. > >> > >> ...to tell a lie. > > > > Sherrod's own words are not a lie. > > Breitbart's crime is obvious and no one will ever buy his bullshit > again. Not much of a businessman, is he? If it is so obvious then you can quote the specific laws that he broke.
From: Howard Brazee on 1 Aug 2010 09:56
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 09:07:20 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> However, it is neither atheistic nor theistic. > >According to Science a theory cannot never become a certanty. The word "theory" has several meanings in popular culture and in science. The theories of gravity and of evolution fit this definition: ? noun: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |