From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.26bf3b963bd18c9d98a17b(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <alangbaker-27495F.05365101082010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> >
> > In article <MPG.26bf2ff0ab24ec6798a174(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <alangbaker-15E2AB.23062231072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> > > alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> > > >
> > > > In article <8bjv3hFufjU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:wclark2-DBCC9B.17523931072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> > > > > > In article <8bj66lFm27U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> > > > > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:MPG.26be08094943135398a15f(a)news.giganews.com...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And, superstition is more widely believed and adhered to around
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > world than science.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ask any baseball player. Golfers too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Greg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, their superstition does not contribute to their ability at the
> > > > > > game,
> > > > > > just to how they calm their nerves.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's belief. I didn't claim there was in validity. It's a shot in
> > > > > the
> > > > > dark, like atheistic evolution.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Greg
> > > >
> > > > LOL
> > > >
> > > > Evolution is not atheistic or theistic, Greg. It simply is.
> > >
> > > Evolution is a theory.
> >
> > Correct. I'd say at this point it is a theory that is a close to proven
> > as any theory can ever be, but it is still a theory.
> >
> > However, it is neither atheistic nor theistic.
>
> According to Science a theory cannot never become a certanty.
>
> The F word always comes into play when it comes down to the nunts and
> bolts.

There is only one "F" word for nutters like you. Tell you what, why
don't you let us all in on the evidence for the faith-based origins of
human life?
From: William Clark on
In article <8bjv78Fv08U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:

> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:wclark2-FB9D3E.17483031072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>
> > No, I am arriving at a conclusion unequivocally supported by the
> > observed evidence - that you are a dumbass :-)
>
> Here are my unequivocally observations
>
> 1. BAR isn't dumb
> 2. You are full of yourself.
>
> -Greg

1) In this context he certainly is.

2) Don't confuse confidence in overwhelming scientific evidence with
faith-based speculation :-).

3) Get a sense of humor.
From: BAR on
In article <wclark2-8555EF.11183701082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
>
> In article <MPG.26be9cdadaeb0da698a16d(a)news.giganews.com>,
> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <wclark2-7B0F5F.17403131072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> > >
> > > In article <MPG.26be29157aaaf08498a161(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <wclark2-24C74C.12303731072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> > > > > > >> > So what color is the sky in your world? America didn't want the
> > > > > > >> > scum
> > > > > > >> > here.
> > > > > > >> > Obama listened. A first for him.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Are they worse scum than the rapists and child molesters that we
> > > > > > >> incarcerate here?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Or Anthony Breitbart?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another person who scares the libs as much as Palin.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, another person that the left would LOVE to keep front and center,
> > > > > just like Eskimo Barbie. The longer the GoP looks as though it is
> > > > > hitched to them, the longer they stay out of power.
> > > >
> > > > Why are the British now de-centralizing and privatizing health services
> > > > delivery? Could it be that the left has been wrong about command and
> > > > control of vast swaths of the economy?
> > >
> > > Because they have elected a right wing government, idealogically wedded
> > > to the notion of privatization. The state of the economy has nothing to
> > > do with it for them. Were you asleep during the Thatcher years?
> >
> > Now we are getting somewhere, you are against private property. When are
> > you going to disgorge your private property?
>
> Bertie, Bertie, your syntax meter seems to be as far out of whack as
> your ethical one. Who builds roads in the US? You?

You need to do some research Billy before you ask that question. You
would be surprised by what you find.
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.26bf616866ad2c6e98a180(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <wclark2-D1994D.11114301082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> > > > >
> > > > > Breitbart is a publisher and he made a business decision just like
> > > > > the
> > > > > NYT, WaPo and other media outlets.
> > > > >
> > > > > Judgement on Breitbart's using your moral question is irrelevant.
> > > > >
> > > > > Remember, government censor, businesses make decisions.
> > > >
> > > > So did he lie with the intention of misrepresenting the NAACP and Ms.
> > > > Sherrod or not? Simple question. Have the cojones to answer it.
> > >
> > > He made a business decision.
> >
> > OK, so you simply refuse to see this as a total distortion of the truth
> > for political ends. Just goes to show how much any of your "opinions"
> > are worth. Absolutely nothing from a moral midget.
> >
>
> Exactly what was distored?

Nothing was "distored" - the message of her remarks were "distorted" and
turned around 180 degrees by editing deliberately intended to deceive.
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.26bf62b58326f5f798a181(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <wclark2-8453CE.11171301082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> >
> > In article <MPG.26be9c9cd52124da98a16c(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <38u856tig9v3mdq3orii3kae1vl4b74sgj(a)4ax.com>, donsno2
> > > @charter.net says...
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:39:17 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >You are a fool if you think that the Sec of Ag went off on his own and
> > > > >fired a black woman for speaking at an NAACP event without consulting
> > > > >the White House and the DOJ first. Vislack didn't appoint Sherrod and
> > > > >he
> > > > >sure as hell wasn't going to fire her without getting permission.
> > > >
> > > > It wasn't even about *speaking* at an NAACP event--it was about
> > > > accepting Breitbart's cherry-picked snippet as believable evidence
> > > > that Sherrod was racist. Almost nobody did due diligence on the
> > > > episode, but Breitbart didn't even intend to.
> > >
> > > Why was Sherrod pushed out of Ag?
> > >
> > > It was a knee jerk reaction by the Obama administration with the
> > > knowledge of Obama and the DOJ. Political appointees serve at the
> > > pleasure of the president due to the fact that they are appointed by the
> > > president. Obama doesn't need to perform due dillegence on Sherrod. He
> > > can just say her services are no longer needed and it would be better if
> > > her resume didn't say she was fired.
> >
> > No, by the Dept. of Ag. If you disagree, please cite the source for "the
> > knowledge of Obama and the DOJ", or else withdraw. Another cheap attempt
> > to smear from a moral pygmy who defends Breitbart.
> > >
> > > The DOJ just confirmed that political or patronage position like US
> > > attornies can be fired at any time for any reason. Sherrod was a
> > > political problem for Obama and the Democrats
> >
> > More typical BS.
>
> The newsgroups most prolific liar is demanding that I withdraw an
> opinion.
>
> You really don't keep up with politics Billy.
> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128675651

Just your usual. Why don't you just spend the rest of the day looking
for your moral backbone?
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?