From: William Clark on
In article <4c55f2b5$0$15837$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:49:14 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > In article <d3bcc339-516d-4092-8f49-b0c5e64bda99
> > @l32g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> >
> >> Nancy Reagan refused to curtsy to Queen Elizabeth during a visit to
> >> London, because she considered herself the Queen's equal.
> >
> > I wouldn't bow to any King either. I am subservient to no man or
> > woman.
>
> You are subservient to the government/corporate interests that rule the
> country. Whether you see that or not is irrelevant.

Never mind, it's just that he has no manners, that's all.
From: Alan Baker on
In article <MPG.26bfa94c52adf27998a188(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <4c55cc7c$0$12238$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >
> > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:11:22 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > > In article <wclark2-48697E.13012701082010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says...
> > >> In article <MPG.26bf30409b5cfafb98a175(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR
> > >> <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> > >>> In article <alangbaker-6FE270.23073531072010(a)news.shawcable.com>,
> > >>> alangbaker(a)telus.net says...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> So you are telling us that atheistic evolution isn't faith based?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Answer me one question, Greg:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> How many years old do personally believe the earth is?
> > >>>
> > >>> Research says it is some 4 to 10 billion years old.
> > >>
> > >> Ah, in other words scientific evidence says so. Not 6,000 years, no
> > >> dinosaurs with saddles on?
> > >
> > > You, Carbon and Baker are laughable each and every time you bring this
> > > up. You are under the misguided impression that anyone who is in
> > > disagreement with you is a fundie or some religious nut.
> >
> > Not necessarily. If you had any idea what the scientific method was you
> > probably wouldn't jump to conclusions quite as much.
>
> Dude I am married to a real scientist, someone who does real science 5
> days a week. She is degreed in geology and chemistry and is an expert in
> the battery field, with 25 years of experience.
>
> I understand Science and the scientific method just fine. However, I
> don't pray at the alter of Science like some of you.

Oh, please...

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article <MPG.26bfbd93c85a419c98a197(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <5kqb56diek5m92djb6v60r1ilcpl82im5u(a)4ax.com>, donsno2
> @charter.net says...
> >
> > On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:58:09 -0600, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:56:46 -0400, William Clark
> > ><wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>Oh, and it is not necessary to be an atheist to believe in evolution.
> > >>That's just another creationist crock.
> >
> > >The big objection isn't in evolution - some evolution was obvious long
> > >before Darwin.
> >
> > >The objection is in natural selection, as long as "natural" means "not
> > >done by God or by Man". And of course, the idea that humans evolved
> > >from something else.
> >
> > It's easier to find physical evidence that mankind (and every other
> > living thing) evolved from gobs of protoplasm than it is to find
> > evidence that there is a creative mind behind it all. It's in the
> > DNA.
>
> Where did the DNA come from?
>
> I am not a propoent of intelligent design, never have been and never
> will be. But, someone is going to have to come up with an explanation of
> what caused the Big Bang. Chaos theory can be used to describe DNA
> oringination on Earth but, if we start finding DNA in other parts of he
> Solar systme, Galaxy or Universe there will have to be some re-Sciencing
> going on.

Why?

And if "someone" needs to explain what caused the Big Bang, then why
don't the religions need to explain what "caused" their gods?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on
In article <MPG.26bfb482f0576a4b98a18d(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <5bce0345-50d7-414d-b91e-
> 63c4410f207f(a)u38g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> >
> > On Jul 31, 5:50�pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> > wrote:
> > > In article <MPG.26be3037a8c94fce98a...(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <8bj63tFlh...(a)mid.individual.net>, d...(a)remove.ipns.com
> > > > says...
> > >
> > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > > >news:4c542eaa$0$4990$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> > >
> > > > > > Greg, I know how you feel about Reagan and I concede that he was a
> > > > > > convincing issuer of platitudes and was very popular throughout his
> > > > > > Presidency. This was partly because the scandals, such as the
> > > > > > Iran-Contra affair, never seemed to stick to him. Now, why was
> > > > > > that?
> > > > > > IMHO, it was because when he went to the Hill and said "I don't
> > > > > > know,"
> > > > > > and "I don't recall," all those hundreds of times, they believed
> > > > > > him.
> > >
> > > > > I have a better answer. �America didn't care. �In of itself, ripping
> > > > > off the
> > > > > Iranians to support the Contras wasn't that bad of an idea. �In terms
> > > > > of an
> > > > > outstanding presidency, it was a bump in the road.
> > >
> > > > It was a smart business decision. But, I wouldn't expect Carbon to
> > > > understand what Iran-Contra was really about.
> > >
> > > Yes, it's really worked out well, vis a vis Iran, hasn't it?
> >
> > I wonder how many Americans those TOW missiles killed.
>
> Zero.

It must be simply terrific to be omniscient...

You're sure, are you? No one in Iran ever fired those missiles at any
vehicle or structure that had an American in it?

None were ever given or sold to groups hostile to the United States?

You know these things for facts, do you?

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: BAR on
In article <qj0c56tlujqaquuni9pbefbl7pfc70u3d1(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:50:15 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
>
> >You really do need to grow up and realize that the press has been
> >distoring peoples remarks for ever since the printing press was
> >invented.
> >
>
> Amazing that you accept, and obviously support, this. Well, in
> certain instances that fit your thinking.

Again you make me laugh. Your immaturity is amazing.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?