A British Open Double Bogey
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: MNMikeW on 2 Aug 2010 10:33 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-51149A.13460030072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <8bgrk7FbjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> news:alangbaker-5220E0.13145830072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> > In article <8bgpp7FlhfU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> >> news:3db65615cpe39s1qjhqr94pvjppkrdpn6n(a)4ax.com... >> >> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:46:15 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> >> >>news:cs96565pcht63vii7n6ufcncmpdil3l6k4(a)4ax.com... >> >> >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:21:37 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the >> >> >>>>> mess, >> >> >>>>> hasn't. He's an idiot. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>Breitbarts target was the NAACP, not Sherrod. She made the >> >> >>>>statements. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> Try to watch this without your mind being closed and see where the >> >> >>> origins of the problem were. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> http://www.google.com/search?q=shirley+sherrod&hl=en&safe=off&client=sa >> >> >>> far >> >> >>> i&rls=en&prmd=nuvo&source=univ&tbs=nws:1&tbo=u&ei=mlBITJDrMIS8lQeUlZyiC >> >> >>> w&s >> >> >>> a=X&oi=news_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQsQQwAA >> >> >>> >> >> >>> BK >> >> >> >> >> >>Did you see the video posted on Breitbarts site? >> >> >> >> >> > Not on his site, but on news sites. Obviously Sherrod saw them too >> >> > or >> >> > she wouldn't even think about suing him. >> >> > >> >> Well if you saw what Breitbart had posted, you would have seen that it >> >> included the part where she said she had the revelation that it wasn't >> >> about >> >> black and white. She has no case. >> > >> > That makes it worse, doesn't it? >> > >> What? The leftys have their thongs in a bunch over how Breitbart >> supposedly >> edited out the part about Sherrod and her "revelation". He didn't. > > And making accusations about her racism aren't worse when you know they > aren't true? > They are just fine and dandy when the left does it.
From: MNMikeW on 2 Aug 2010 10:39 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-2C7824.19400201082010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <MPG.26bff8e5a51396c798a1a2(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> In article <alangbaker-B376F5.19054801082010(a)news.shawcable.com>, >> alangbaker(a)telus.net says... >> > >> > In article <MPG.26bfb482f0576a4b98a18d(a)news.giganews.com>, >> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> > >> > > In article <5bce0345-50d7-414d-b91e- >> > > 63c4410f207f(a)u38g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com >> > > says... >> > > > >> > > > On Jul 31, 5:50 pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > In article <MPG.26be3037a8c94fce98a...(a)news.giganews.com>, >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >> > > > > > In article <8bj63tFlh...(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > > > > > d...(a)remove.ipns.com >> > > > > > says... >> > > > > >> > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> > > > > > >news:4c542eaa$0$4990$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Greg, I know how you feel about Reagan and I concede that >> > > > > > > > he >> > > > > > > > was a >> > > > > > > > convincing issuer of platitudes and was very popular >> > > > > > > > throughout >> > > > > > > > his >> > > > > > > > Presidency. This was partly because the scandals, such as >> > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > Iran-Contra affair, never seemed to stick to him. Now, why >> > > > > > > > was >> > > > > > > > that? >> > > > > > > > IMHO, it was because when he went to the Hill and said "I >> > > > > > > > don't >> > > > > > > > know," >> > > > > > > > and "I don't recall," all those hundreds of times, they >> > > > > > > > believed >> > > > > > > > him. >> > > > > >> > > > > > > I have a better answer. America didn't care. In of itself, >> > > > > > > ripping >> > > > > > > off the >> > > > > > > Iranians to support the Contras wasn't that bad of an idea. >> > > > > > > In >> > > > > > > terms >> > > > > > > of an >> > > > > > > outstanding presidency, it was a bump in the road. >> > > > > >> > > > > > It was a smart business decision. But, I wouldn't expect Carbon >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > understand what Iran-Contra was really about. >> > > > > >> > > > > Yes, it's really worked out well, vis a vis Iran, hasn't it? >> > > > >> > > > I wonder how many Americans those TOW missiles killed. >> > > >> > > Zero. >> > >> > It must be simply terrific to be omniscient... >> > >> > You're sure, are you? No one in Iran ever fired those missiles at any >> > vehicle or structure that had an American in it? >> > >> >> Why are becoming tiresome. > > Really? You find being asked to support your nonsense "tiresome", do you? > > Seriously, how can you expect to have any credibility at all when you > make fatuous remarks like that last one? > Why don't you tell us how many Americans were killed by the TOWs then.
From: MNMikeW on 2 Aug 2010 10:50 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4c5364d2$0$4971$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:40:34 -0400, BAR wrote: >> In article <ac846e85-0adb-4709-9406-220d71ca8482 >> @l14g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... >>>> >>>>> Followiing his ordering of Gitmo closed within a year, the right >>>>> wing scare machine jumped into action, frightening Americans into >>>>> beleiving that our prisons were incapable of holding prisoners (as >>>>> if terrorists had some sort of X-Men magical powers -- no prison >>>>> could hold them), and that terrorists would soon be walking the >>>>> streets of America. >>>>> >>>>> Like most arguments advanced by the right, it was based in pure >>>>> fantasy. And like most arguments advanced by the right, many stupid >>>>> American people bought it hook, line and sinker. >>>>> >>>>> Americans = often not the sharpest knives in the drawer. >>>> >>>> So what color is the sky in your world? America didn't want the scum >>>> here. Obama listened. A first for him. >>> >>> Are they worse scum than the rapists and child molesters that we >>> incarcerate here? >> >> Like Obama you haven't thought it through. What is the difference >> between the persons housed at Gitmo and the criminals you described? > > Those housed at Gitmo have been tortured, so there is no practical way > to prosecute them. All of them?
From: MNMikeW on 2 Aug 2010 10:52 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-158BF7.12431131072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <hrl65610tslk3f90vtqiboancnsge9g7jn(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:44:27 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <aij6569cpam0ad72mac777mo5cqji2gjen(a)4ax.com>, >> >bknight(a)conramp.net says... >> >> >> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the mess, >> >> >> hasn't. He's an idiot. >> >> > >> >> >Has every press outlet apologized for each and every mistake they >> >> >have >> >> >ever made? No. >> >> > >> >> Thanks for admitting he made a mistake. >> > >> >I made no such admission. I asked a question and answered the question. >> > >> >> >Stop acting like a spoiled child. >> >> >> >> Wanting someone to own up is acting like a spoiled child? >> >> Oh, its Bert. I forgot. >> > >> >You are forgetting that the press cherry picks bits and pieces of >> >interviews and videos to bias what they present each and every day. The >> >fact that you won't admit that this SOP is laughable. >> > >> > >> What's laughable is that you obviously aren't smart enough to even >> discuss this. Bert the Shallow jumps in after the points are made. >> >> BK > > He doesn't WANT to discuss this, because it is yet another disgusting > piece of deliberate distortion from his heroes on the far right. Kind of like the Tea Party smear from your heroes(zeros) on the far left.
From: MNMikeW on 2 Aug 2010 11:03
"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-5C18F7.12513931072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <4c536b4e$0$4970$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:37:55 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> > news:alangbaker-C06CE9.13143130072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> >> In article <8bgpttFmcfU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" >> >> <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >>> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> >>> news:alangbaker-EDCC5B.13025030072010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> >>> >> >>>> The full video is 43 minutes long. >> >>>> >> >>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk> >> >>>> >> >>>> Don't you think a real journalist would have reviewed that before >> >>>> putting up cherry-picked sections of it and passing judgement? >> >>> >> >>> What makes you think he didn't have the whole video? >> >> >> >> If he did, that makes his actions even worse, because it has been >> >> pretty much universally agreed that anyone who has seen the whole >> >> video could never have made the claims of racism that Breitbart made. >> >> >> >> You're really digging yourself a hole here, Mike, and for what? >> >> >> > I not digging anything. Breitbart is attempting to show racism at the >> > NAACP, not specifically to Sherrod. Whether you think he does or does >> > not accomplish this is debatable. >> >> He was attempting to smear the NAACP, not "show racism." Look at his >> deliberately misleading excerpt. Then look at the full video. Unless >> you're totally demented you'll be able to see what he did. > > I think you've hit the nail on the head with the "demented" bit :-) Carbons lap dog speaks! Woof! |