A British Open Double Bogey
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Ping Alan Baker
Next: Where is the old boy today?
From: MNMikeW on 2 Aug 2010 11:05 "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message news:MPG.26bfb595878f51d998a18e(a)news.giganews.com... > In article <d20c051b-6230-45ce-bb98-66f493617716 > @z34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... >> > >> > > I think you've hit the nail on the head with the "demented" bit :-) >> > >> > By definition the NAACP is a racist organization. >> >> That may be the dumbest thing you've ever said, but given the wealth >> of choices, it's really hard to say. >> > > Tell me John, would an organization that promoted Asians be racist, what > about Caucasians? Just were is the line. > > "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a > nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by > the content of their character." > > Organizations that are based upon racial distinctions are racist. > > An organization desperate to find relevancy in a "post racial" era.
From: MNMikeW on 2 Aug 2010 11:07 "Howard Brazee" <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote in message news:a61756ladrjhnaj0uhl8ejbpq18folbipu(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:51:26 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >>It's his policies I don't like. And it will take some doing to undo them. >>And Obama has already cost the country. Dearly. > > His policies of having the same bosses as his predecessor have cost > this country dearly. The foreign wars, the drug war, Big Business > welfare have increased our debt, kept the recession going, and have > given more power to the fascist radio shows. You mean like Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes and Mike Malloy? Those fascists? > > But the question is - how are these going to be undone? Is there > someone who can win who will get us out of those expensive wars? Is > there someone who will say no to the moneyed special interests? Is > there someone who is going to help the middle class and small > business? > > Certainly the wealthy are selling their program to more voters. But > that won't help anybody except the wealthy. > > -- > "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, > than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace > to the legislature, and not to the executive department." > > - James Madison
From: MNMikeW on 2 Aug 2010 12:00 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-461BD8.12331031072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <8bgpfgFjmcU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> news:mfb656lnn3k6l3kud0kfmufbuia7740k81(a)4ax.com... >> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:52:27 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> >>news:3ka656pd3g5igp3s7c5tevo6nff6d5b2qa(a)4ax.com... >> >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:37:24 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >> >>> wrote: >> > >> >>>>> You, on the other hand, have nothing but one way political thought >> >>>>> as >> >>>>> evidenced here. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> BK >> >>>> >> >>>>Right Bobby. Your words don't match your rhetoric. >> >>>> >> >>> What a laugh. My words ARE rhetoric. You need a dictionary. >> >>> >> >>> Do you mean my words don't match my actions? What the hell do you >> >>> know about my actions? >> >>> >> >>> Nothing. >> >>>> >> >> >> >>You are just as party line as anyone else here. >> > >> > Only to you and Moderate. I vote split tickets and even supported >> > Bush when he was in office. I wanted him to be effective, he just >> > wasn't. He was a joke. >> > >> > As I said, you seem to want Obama to fail more than you want the >> > country to recover. That's extreme right wing. >> > >> No Bobby you just don't get it. People want the country to recover. The >> majority of us don't think Obama is going to get us there. Hopefully he >> proves us wrong, but I just cant see it right now. > > "Hopefully he proves us wrong"? Don't make me laugh - you and the rest > of the wingnuts are devastated at the prospect of that happening. Devastated? No, more like highly skeptical.
From: Alan Baker on 2 Aug 2010 12:05 In article <8bo395FkeiU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-502865.13452630072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <8bgrh0FvcoU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-C06CE9.13143130072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> > In article <8bgpttFmcfU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> >> news:alangbaker-EDCC5B.13025030072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> >> > In article <8bgp49Fhh5U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:dra656dounn78rv7lt2qppvaa6sbkal8tl(a)4ax.com... > >> >> >> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:42:27 -0700, Alan Baker > >> >> >> > <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>In article <8bgo0iFaphU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> >> >> >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > You mean "She made the statements that Breitbart deliberately > >> >> >> >>> > distorted", don't you? > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> Breitbart didn't distort anything. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>Yes. He did. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>Editing a video so that you leave out information that totally > >> >> >> >>changes > >> >> >> >>its meaning is distortion. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > There's no way to get the far right to view anything without an > >> >> >> > un > >> >> >> > jaundiced eye. "None so blind...." you know. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > BK > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Perhaps you two should see it for yourselves. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/07/19/video-proof-the-naacp- > >> >> >> awa > >> >> >> rds > >> >> >> -ra > >> >> >> cism2010/ > >> >> > > >> >> > Perhaps you should realize that that is not a video of her entire > >> >> > speech > >> >> > and even Breitbart now admits it was a distortion of her actions: > >> >> > > >> >> > "Correction: While Ms. Sherrod made the remarks captured in the > >> >> > first > >> >> > video featured in this post while she held a federally appointed > >> >> > position, the story she tells refers to actions she took before she > >> >> > held > >> >> > that federal position." > >> >> > >> >> This correction has nothing to do with what is on the tape. Just when > >> >> it > >> >> was > >> >> recorded. > >> > > >> > No. The correction has nothing to do with when the video recorded, but > >> > when the events that were described on the tape took place. > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > The full video is 43 minutes long. > >> >> > > >> >> > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk> > >> >> > > >> >> > Don't you think a real journalist would have reviewed that before > >> >> > putting up cherry-picked sections of it and passing judgement? > >> >> > > >> >> What makes you think he didn't have the whole video? > >> > > >> > If he did, that makes his actions even worse, because it has been > >> > pretty > >> > much universally agreed that anyone who has seen the whole video could > >> > never have made the claims of racism that Breitbart made. > >> > > >> > You're really digging yourself a hole here, Mike, and for what? > >> > > >> I not digging anything. Breitbart is attempting to show racism at the > >> NAACP, > >> not specifically to Sherrod. Whether you think he does or does not > >> accomplish this is debatable. > > > > LOL > > > > So he's trying to show racism by release a cherry-picked portion of a > > speech that doesn't actually show racism if you actually watch the whole > > thing? > > > Seeing the crowd laugh during her "white farmer" tale was telling. And now you start the deflection... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 2 Aug 2010 12:06
In article <8bo3ajFkiaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-51149A.13460030072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <8bgrk7FbjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-5220E0.13145830072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > >> > In article <8bgpp7FlhfU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >> >> news:3db65615cpe39s1qjhqr94pvjppkrdpn6n(a)4ax.com... > >> >> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:46:15 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > >> >> >>news:cs96565pcht63vii7n6ufcncmpdil3l6k4(a)4ax.com... > >> >> >>> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:21:37 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>> The White House has apologized. Breitbart, who started the > >> >> >>>>> mess, > >> >> >>>>> hasn't. He's an idiot. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>Breitbarts target was the NAACP, not Sherrod. She made the > >> >> >>>>statements. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>> Try to watch this without your mind being closed and see where the > >> >> >>> origins of the problem were. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> http://www.google.com/search?q=shirley+sherrod&hl=en&safe=off&client > >> >> >>> =sa > >> >> >>> far > >> >> >>> i&rls=en&prmd=nuvo&source=univ&tbs=nws:1&tbo=u&ei=mlBITJDrMIS8lQeUlZ > >> >> >>> yiC > >> >> >>> w&s > >> >> >>> a=X&oi=news_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQsQQwAA > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> BK > >> >> >> > >> >> >>Did you see the video posted on Breitbarts site? > >> >> >> > >> >> > Not on his site, but on news sites. Obviously Sherrod saw them too > >> >> > or > >> >> > she wouldn't even think about suing him. > >> >> > > >> >> Well if you saw what Breitbart had posted, you would have seen that it > >> >> included the part where she said she had the revelation that it wasn't > >> >> about > >> >> black and white. She has no case. > >> > > >> > That makes it worse, doesn't it? > >> > > >> What? The leftys have their thongs in a bunch over how Breitbart > >> supposedly > >> edited out the part about Sherrod and her "revelation". He didn't. > > > > And making accusations about her racism aren't worse when you know they > > aren't true? > > > They are just fine and dandy when the left does it. Failure to answer the question, Mike... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |