From: Howard Brazee on
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:33:40 -0500, John van der Pflum
<nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote:

>So, the golfer would have to know how many shots he/she was getting on
>a particular hole in order to "pick up" when he was out of the hole,
>yes?

Same as net match play.
From: johnty on
On 14 Feb, 10:26, Pat Williams <j...(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> > How would you apply it for a handicapped tournament where there are
> > scratch golfers and 30 handicappers? Would the score on each hole be
> > net score for calculating the Stableford points?
>
> You may be interested in the following.
>
> Dr.Frank Stableford was playing golf almost a century ago from a handicap of +1.
> So he was no mean golfer. In the late 20's and 30's he played at Wallasey which
> is over the river Mersey from Liverpool on the Wirral and anyone who knows that
> area has experienced the winds that howl across the estuary at times. Not having
> many strokes to play with he got fed up with a disaster in the wind at one hole
> which put him out of many competitions. So he devised the Stableford scoring
> system which meant that an individual hole was not necessarily the end of the
> round, for it meant zero points for that hole alone. With his playing ability he
> had 17 other holes to recover, as did everyone else.
>
> The first competition was at Wallasey in May 1932 and from there developed into
> a very popular competition format here in the UK. It used to be played from a
> percentage of the player's handicap (often 7/8ths.) but of recent years the
> format is full handicap. (CONGU's recommendation.) 36 points is an average score
> when playing to your handicap and anything over 40 warrants a hefty cut in handicap.
>
> I once read of a score of 57 points somewhere in France which I thought was
> outrageous but I subsequently discovered that the chap was playing from a 54
> handicap.
>
> Anyone passing by Liverpool give Wallasey a go. It has a classic finishing hole.
>

It is a beautiful course (in the eye of this beholder, anyway).

Sadly, Dr Stableford took his own life when his increasing age-ralted
disabilities prevented him from playing golf.

A littel more at
http://www.ruleshistory.com/scoring


From: Paul Schmitz-Josten on
Pat Williams in <45d2e3cb$1_1(a)mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>:

>I once read of a score of 57 points somewhere in France which I thought was
>outrageous but I subsequently discovered that the chap was playing from a 54
>handicap.

I witnessed a prize ceremony last year where a guy (HCP 54) won, having
played a gross score of 90, 18 gross points (4 pars, 10 bogeys, 3 double
and 1 triple bogey), equalling 77 Stableford.

His fellow club members cheered heartily and I heard that he had practiced
for about two years before ever playing a tourney.

His new handicap would be around 25, still leaving some room for more...

Ciao & F'Up2 usg

Paul
From: Howard Brazee on
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:25:10 +0100, Paul Schmitz-Josten
<alossola(a)web.de> wrote:

>>I once read of a score of 57 points somewhere in France which I thought was
>>outrageous but I subsequently discovered that the chap was playing from a 54
>>handicap.

Many organizations cap how high a handicap can be.

>I witnessed a prize ceremony last year where a guy (HCP 54) won, having
>played a gross score of 90, 18 gross points (4 pars, 10 bogeys, 3 double
>and 1 triple bogey), equalling 77 Stableford.
>
>His fellow club members cheered heartily and I heard that he had practiced
>for about two years before ever playing a tourney.

There's a word for that.
From: Pat Williams on

>
>> I witnessed a prize ceremony last year where a guy (HCP 54) won, having
>> played a gross score of 90, 18 gross points (4 pars, 10 bogeys, 3 double
>> and 1 triple bogey), equalling 77 Stableford.
>>
>> His fellow club members cheered heartily and I heard that he had practiced
>> for about two years before ever playing a tourney.
>
> There's a word for that.

I could think of more than one!

JPW