A speech without substance
in [Golf]
|
From: Lloyd Parsons on 5 Sep 2008 14:44 In article <8W9wk.9729$676.5484(a)newsfe01.iad>, "Frank Ketchum" <nospamforme(a)thanksanyway.net> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-992F1F.07475505092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > Does anyone seriously want Palin as President? Yikes. > > > > Yeah, she only has and 80% job approval rating in Alaska. She did, but now it is down around 65%. Still good.
From: LongRodSilver on 5 Sep 2008 15:34 On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 08:44:21 -0500, "Heywood Jablowmi" <hsquindo(a)optonline.net> wrote: >>> The one brief mention of policy was stolen straight from Barack >>> Obama's DNC speech. Which was stolen from McCains speeches he's been giving for the past year.. the libs havent been for drilling at all.. until now.. they stole McCain's talking point and now you try and pass it off as yours.. hahah
From: the Moderator on 5 Sep 2008 15:41 "Lloyd Parsons" <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote in message news:lloydparsons-860FD7.13433905092008(a)news.individual.net... > In article <6id45nFq9g7uU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > >> "Frank Ketchum" <nospamforme(a)thanksanyway.net> wrote in message >> news:r4cwk.37562$Rs1.1283(a)newsfe08.iad... >> > >> > "lein" <boomer_the_cat(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message >> > news:302691a1-7a67-47c5-a248-85ba89095f71(a)b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> > >> > > When Barack says "I'll invest 150 billion dollars", does that mean >> > > he'll invest his money or yours? >> > >> > To liberals, our money is theirs. >> >> No truer words. I get a kick out of all the talk about foreclosures. If >> the Dems control the white house and congress, then $$ will fall from the >> sky and make these people's payments for them. Same with health >> insurance. >> Same with the price of gas. >> >> -Greg > > Oh please! > > The republicans have spent and borrowed more than the Democrats every > thought they could get away with. > > After this administration and the congress he had most of that time, I > don't ever want to hear a Republican talk about pissing money away. No way. The social programs the Democrats enacted are many times more expensive than the amount spent on this war.
From: Trevor Zion Bauknight on 5 Sep 2008 15:49 In article <3LydnWkk_dT6FlzVnZ2dnUVZ_t7inZ2d(a)centurytel.net>, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote: > "Lloyd Parsons" <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote in message > news:lloydparsons-860FD7.13433905092008(a)news.individual.net... > > In article <6id45nFq9g7uU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > >> "Frank Ketchum" <nospamforme(a)thanksanyway.net> wrote in message > >> news:r4cwk.37562$Rs1.1283(a)newsfe08.iad... > >> > > >> > "lein" <boomer_the_cat(a)my-deja.com> wrote in message > >> > news:302691a1-7a67-47c5-a248-85ba89095f71(a)b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > >> > > >> > > When Barack says "I'll invest 150 billion dollars", does that mean > >> > > he'll invest his money or yours? > >> > > >> > To liberals, our money is theirs. > >> > >> No truer words. I get a kick out of all the talk about foreclosures. If > >> the Dems control the white house and congress, then $$ will fall from the > >> sky and make these people's payments for them. Same with health > >> insurance. > >> Same with the price of gas. > >> > >> -Greg > > > > Oh please! > > > > The republicans have spent and borrowed more than the Democrats every > > thought they could get away with. > > > > After this administration and the congress he had most of that time, I > > don't ever want to hear a Republican talk about pissing money away. > > No way. The social programs the Democrats enacted are many times more > expensive than the amount spent on this war. They also benefit far, far, far, far, FAR more people. -- Trev
From: William Clark on 5 Sep 2008 16:36
In article <cqewk.30150$Fr1.13101(a)newsfe03.iad>, "Frank Ketchum" <nospamforme(a)thanksanyway.net> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-C86C5D.10284705092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > Pardon? Miss Alaska would like to drill to line her pockets. Many of the > > rest of us would like to preserve something for nature, especially given > > that we will be done with oil within the next 50 years anyway. > > Perhaps you should do a little research about all of the different products > that we use daily which are derived from oil. You are touching one of them > right now. And how stupid is it that we have allowed ourselves to become so totally dependent on it, when we could have invested in the research to produce alternatives years ago? Looks pretty dumb right now. |