A speech without substance
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 13 Sep 2008 20:08 On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:31:07 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > On 13 Sep 2008 20:48:00 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> > wrote: > >>> Where is his undergraduate transcript? >> >>Now you're being ridiculous. > > The only really objective measures that could settle this are Obama's > SAT and LSAT scores. Too bad he wont release them. > > His undergraduate GPA and his work at HLS are totally subjective. Jack, let me ask you something. Since McCain's and Palin's academic records are pathetic by any rational measure, how can you possibly assume their SAT's would be better than Obama's? Wouldn't it be more reasonable to assume that Obama would be way ahead there as well?
From: Alan Baker on 13 Sep 2008 20:10 In article <SoGdnWRlWJV3yVHVnZ2dnUVZ_rLinZ2d(a)comcast.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > Carbon wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:54:41 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > >> Where is his undergraduate transcript? > > > > Now you're being ridiculous. Palin took six years to finish a four year > > degree. McCain graduated 905 out of 909. I can guarantee you McCain's and > > Palin's handlers will be avoiding the subject of academic achievement at > > all costs. > > McCain was 895 out or 899. > > Where was Obama ranked in his undergraduate class? I don't know. But we *do* know it was good enough to get him into Harvard Law, right? Do you supposed McCain's results would have been good enough? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: BAR on 13 Sep 2008 20:15 Alan Baker wrote: > In article <SoGdnWRlWJV3yVHVnZ2dnUVZ_rLinZ2d(a)comcast.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > >> Carbon wrote: >>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:54:41 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> >>>> Where is his undergraduate transcript? >>> Now you're being ridiculous. Palin took six years to finish a four year >>> degree. McCain graduated 905 out of 909. I can guarantee you McCain's and >>> Palin's handlers will be avoiding the subject of academic achievement at >>> all costs. >> McCain was 895 out or 899. >> >> Where was Obama ranked in his undergraduate class? > > I don't know. > > But we *do* know it was good enough to get him into Harvard Law, right? No we don't. All we know is that Obama attended and graduated from Harvard Law. We do not know how or why Obama was accepted to Harvard Law. > > Do you supposed McCain's results would have been good enough? > The Navy most likely sent him to Navy PG school. Like they send most line officers with moderate intelligence.
From: Carbon on 13 Sep 2008 20:17 On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:42 -0400, BAR wrote: > William Clark wrote: >> In article <De2dnWiJyp5Jh1HVnZ2dnUVZ_sbinZ2d(a)comcast.com>, >> BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: >> >>> Where is his undergraduate transcript? >> >> I doubt you could read it correctly even if it was provided. If this is >> your best effort to disparage his academic record, I think you should >> find something else to occupy your time. > > He must have barely graduated from Columbia. You sure are wrong a lot. Harvard Law is the top law school in the country. They do not accept bottom of the barrel students (i.e. McCain and Palin), period. How can you possibly not know that?
From: Carbon on 13 Sep 2008 20:19
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 20:02:31 -0400, BAR wrote: > Carbon wrote: >> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:54:41 -0400, BAR wrote: >> >>> Where is his undergraduate transcript? >> >> Now you're being ridiculous. Palin took six years to finish a four year >> degree. McCain graduated 905 out of 909. I can guarantee you McCain's >> and Palin's handlers will be avoiding the subject of academic >> achievement at all costs. > > McCain was 895 out or 899. > > Where was Obama ranked in his undergraduate class? Way the hell ahead of McCain. And Palin. |