Allen Doyle swing
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Q: Real definition of link
Next: BOM vs Bangenstein
From: Alan Murphy on 31 Jul 2006 01:04 "larryrsf" <larry(a)delmardata.com> wrote in message news:1154295264.848189.150690(a)m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > > On the tee my goal is to get it in the middle of the fairway--even if > only 200 yards. Then my goal is to hit it toward the green-- but never > sacrificing accuracy for distance. If getting it there might require > too much effort for a relaxed swing, I just bunt it straight --knowing > I will have a perfect lie for a pitchup. Etc. etc. A different way > to play golf-- but what I call "engineer golf." > > Larry > I'd call it "senior golf". Alan
From: larry on 31 Jul 2006 11:33 On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:02:34 GMT, Ernie <ernie(a)pga.org> wrote: >lying The instant you write such a word you lose me-- and nearly every other objective reader. That is not debate, it is ad hominem attack, and of course it does not deserve an answer. Larry
From: Ernie on 31 Jul 2006 11:40 In article <mk8sc2pmleg7tf8do4mc8vqde2mtpesdca(a)4ax.com>, larry <larry(a)delmardata.com> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:02:34 GMT, Ernie <ernie(a)pga.org> wrote: > > >lying > > The instant you write such a word you lose me-- and nearly every other > objective reader. That is not debate, it is ad hominem attack, and > of course it does not deserve an answer. > > Larry It is not an ad hominem attack at all, it was a *question* and a valid one. > > > I don't think their physical swings are similar- but their methods are > > > similar in that both golfers have made major adjustments in order to > > > play with total control. Pavin simply relaxes and swings with clubhead > > > speed no higher than most amateurs. Doyle truncates his backswing > > > severely in order NOT to lose control of the clubhead position, plane, > > > etc. They are to be admired because they have have made pragmatic > > > adjustiments that no modern teaching pro would have advised--So they > > > ignored the "conventional wisdom" and do what works. They are smarter > > > than most golfers. > > > > > > Larry > > > > So most amateurs can hit it 263 yards? Well? > > > > And you told us that modern teaching pros knew precisely what to teach > > these days; that they were learning it from the PGA of America! Were you > > lying or just completely wrong? Well? Are you so ashamed of what you've said that you have to hide it?
From: Bobby Knight on 31 Jul 2006 11:57 On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:40:10 GMT, Ernie <ernie(a)pga.org> wrote: >In article <mk8sc2pmleg7tf8do4mc8vqde2mtpesdca(a)4ax.com>, > larry <larry(a)delmardata.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:02:34 GMT, Ernie <ernie(a)pga.org> wrote: >> >> >lying >> >> The instant you write such a word you lose me-- and nearly every other >> objective reader. That is not debate, it is ad hominem attack, and >> of course it does not deserve an answer. >> >> Larry > >It is not an ad hominem attack at all, it was a *question* and a valid >one. You have to understand that LLLLLarry heard the term ad hominem, and never learned what it actually means. He thinks it makes him look smart. He obviously doesn't understand what a lie is either. ___, \o | / \ . "Someone likes every shot"! bk
From: The_Professor on 31 Jul 2006 16:57
X-No-Archive: yes It's kind of pathetic that you cannot make posts talking about your golf game without some lout(s) chiming in to "call" you on something! Especially when these people are the likes of Mr. Comet Cursors. The only really knowledgable person here is David Laville, and I must say that you got off so badly with him is a real loss for you. David knows everything from Ballard to Haney, not to mention Kelly! I forgot more than the rest of these characters know collectively by the time I was 16; but I guess they can sit in some room, alone of course, with some set of books and quote with the best of them! Funny though, that a bunch of characters who don't know that any solid ballstriker who knows how to pinch the ball (pretty much any solid ball striker) can hit a low 4I 185 yard spinner out of a lie in grass in the woods all day consider themselves to be experts on golf! ...and they push such issues just to drive home their ignorance! This group has more or less succumed to people who figure they are going to show you something with this sort of behavior, and it's a classic descent into madness. Real life Lord of the Flies stuff! It's interesting to observe but not worth much more than that. Still, too bad people can't talk about golf without these characters somehow expecting you to justify yourself to them...just goes to show the degree of paranoia in contemporary society I guess. larry wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:02:34 GMT, Ernie <ernie(a)pga.org> wrote: > > >lying > > The instant you write such a word you lose me-- and nearly every other > objective reader. That is not debate, it is ad hominem attack, and > of course it does not deserve an answer. > > Larry |