Baker is right!
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Solitude
Next: Lead Wrist Supination, trapping the ball
From: Kommienezuspadt on 4 Dec 2007 21:12 "John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote in message news:031cl3tscos41h647f3us6lm4qjgq2roj2(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:38:04 -0500, "Kommienezuspadt" > <nospam(a)nothanks.net> wrote: > >> >>"Chris Bellomy" <puevf(a)tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message >>news:0T4k79mgIj31N34(a)redshark.goodshow.net... >>> Robert Hamilton <DBID(a)att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> If Baker will lay off the Larry >>>> type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. >>> >>> Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often >>> insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) >>> if they, too, are to do a similar thing? >>> >>> If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? >>> >> >>That is a wise post & concisely stated -- therefore it has no chance of >>working. >> > > LOL. You've been around RSG a long time haven't you. > -- Long enough! I know it must be silly season. > jvdp > http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
From: Kommienezuspadt on 4 Dec 2007 21:22 "Robert Hamilton" <DBID(a)att.net> wrote in message news:4755F921.1B00030(a)att.net... > > > alan wrote: > >> On Dec 4, 2:22 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: >> > You know, come to think of it, Baker is right when he says I am a >> > hypocrit. The things he says are "facts" about Larry, I see as "facts" >> > about Dalecki, andf I have responded to Dalecki as Baker responds to >> > Larry. Of course Larry doesn't get together some group of friends and >> > decide to "go after" people (like me!) who call him on his blowhard >> > posts, but nonetheless the both do greatly overstate their expertise on >> > golf related matters here, and I react more to the Dalecki type while >> > Baker reacts more to the Baker type. If Baker will lay off the Larry >> > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. >> >> I don't know about you and Mike, but the things I say are facts about >> Larry... >> >> ...*are* facts about Larry. Period. > > Maybe, but the same sorts of "facts" apply equally to Dalecki. > I find it extremely interesting that you are so offended by what you think is someone else's obsession -- but you drag your obsession with Dalecki into the thread. Maybe you are right --- you might like limiting yourself to a circle of friends on facebook.
From: alan on 4 Dec 2007 21:28 On Dec 4, 5:09 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: > alan wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2:22 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > You know, come to think of it, Baker is right when he says I am a > > > hypocrit. The things he says are "facts" about Larry, I see as "facts" > > > about Dalecki, andf I have responded to Dalecki as Baker responds to > > > Larry. Of course Larry doesn't get together some group of friends and > > > decide to "go after" people (like me!) who call him on his blowhard > > > posts, but nonetheless the both do greatly overstate their expertise on > > > golf related matters here, and I react more to the Dalecki type while > > > Baker reacts more to the Baker type. If Baker will lay off the Larry > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. > > > I don't know about you and Mike, but the things I say are facts about > > Larry... > > > ...*are* facts about Larry. Period. > > Maybe, but the same sorts of "facts" apply equally to Dalecki. I wouldn't know, therefore I have the good sense not to comment.
From: Robert Hamilton on 4 Dec 2007 22:48 Kommienezuspadt wrote: > " > > I find it extremely interesting that you are so offended by what you think > is someone else's obsession -- but you drag your obsession with Dalecki into > the thread. You will be hard pressed to find many threads where Dalecki is the OP and there is a post anywhere in the thread from me in say the last year. You will find one though, where Dalecki said he was some great golfer and was dispensing advice to someone on how to become as great a golfer as he. Goes further than Larry with this sort of thing, IMHO. I should have laid off, but I was too weak to resist. Generally, I don't even read Dalecki's posts. Baker, otoh, has jumped on just about every, if not every OP, made by Larry in the last year. So who is obsessed and who is not may be a matter of personal judgement, but if so, it is also an indicator of ability to make rational judgements. > > Maybe you are right --- you might like limiting yourself to a circle of > friends on facebook. When did I ever say I used facebook to any great extent?
From: Kommienezuspadt on 4 Dec 2007 23:14
"Robert Hamilton" <DBID(a)att.net> wrote in message news:47561E6B.C3B5BBEF(a)att.net... > > > Kommienezuspadt wrote: > >> " >> >> I find it extremely interesting that you are so offended by what you >> think >> is someone else's obsession -- but you drag your obsession with Dalecki >> into >> the thread. > > You will be hard pressed to find many threads where Dalecki is the OP and > there > is a post anywhere in the thread from me in say the last year. You will > find one > though, where Dalecki said he was some great golfer and was dispensing > advice > to someone on how to become as great a golfer as he. Goes further than > Larry > with this sort of thing, IMHO. I should have laid off, but I was too weak > to > resist. Generally, I don't even read Dalecki's posts. > > Baker, otoh, has jumped on just about every, if not every OP, made by > Larry in > the last year. So who is obsessed and who is not may be a matter of > personal > judgement, but if so, it is also an indicator of ability to make rational > judgements. > So it's even worse ---- you can't let go of your obsession. >> >> Maybe you are right --- you might like limiting yourself to a circle of >> friends on facebook. > > When did I ever say I used facebook to any great extent? > I did not say you did. You did post this though --- IMHO, the whole newsgroup thing is dying. It was fun for a while, but people get tired of it and move on to other things. Facebook and things like that are the big thing now. Nice thing about them is you can set up a group of people you like independent of the main board. === memory loss? |