Baker is right!
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Solitude
Next: Lead Wrist Supination, trapping the ball
From: the Moderator on 5 Dec 2007 10:21 "Robert Hamilton" <DBID(a)att.net> wrote in message news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net... > > > Tex wrote: > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: >> > Chris Bellomy wrote: >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: >> > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. >> > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing? >> > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? >> > >> > > - >> > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing >> > wrong with that. >> >> Pot, say hello to Kettle. >> >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics" >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in >> Mississippi ? >> >> Tex > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with > alcohol > are alcoholics. This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on someone else doesn't make sense."
From: The_Professor on 5 Dec 2007 10:53 On Dec 5, 9:21 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote: > "Robert Hamilton" <D...(a)att.net> wrote in message > > news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net... > > > > > > > > > Tex wrote: > > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: > >> > Chris Bellomy wrote: > >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: > > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry > >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. > > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often > >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) > >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing? > > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? > > >> > > - > > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground > >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but > >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean > >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing > >> > wrong with that. > > >> Pot, say hello to Kettle. > > >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics" > >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in > >> Mississippi ? > > >> Tex > > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with > > alcohol > > are alcoholics. > > This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on > someone else doesn't make sense."- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things, BTW, but apparently a number of people here are consumed with what I post here...they just can't lay off it..people like you, for example!
From: the Moderator on 5 Dec 2007 12:28 "The_Professor" <dbid(a)att.net> wrote in message news:46bb0c54-e4ae-441b-a7ac-7669c4b7a9ec(a)y43g2000hsy.googlegroups.com... > > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things, BTW, but > apparently a number of people here are consumed with what I post > here...they just can't lay off it..people like you, for example! I enjoy seeing the gnashing of teeth and the spewing of venom. Nothing personal.
From: Mike Dalecki on 5 Dec 2007 13:23 Robert Hamilton wrote: > You know, come to think of it, Baker is right when he says I am a > hypocrit. The things he says are "facts" about Larry, I see as "facts" > about Dalecki, andf I have responded to Dalecki as Baker responds to > Larry. Of course Larry doesn't get together some group of friends and > decide to "go after" people (like me!) who call him on his blowhard > posts, but nonetheless the both do greatly overstate their expertise on > golf related matters here, and I react more to the Dalecki type while > Baker reacts more to the Baker type. If Baker will lay off the Larry > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. > Out of concern for your wellbeing, don't you think it's time to make that appointment with the psychologist? Your...obsession, I guess...with me is rather over the top, wouldn't you say? Mike PS: One of the coven put me on to this thread, though I don't believe we have 13--I think it's 16. It's a laugh, that's for sure. And as much as seeing you exhibit all the symptoms does tickle my funnybone, I really hope you can find some help. PPS: You were wrong about clubmaking then, and you still are. You didn't know what you were talking about. Revisionist history doesn't change that. You mistake my being right with my telling you what to think. Not the same thing, which any normal person can see. -- Mike Dalecki GCA Accredited Clubmaker http://clubdoctor.com RSG-Wisconsin 2007: June 22-24----Lawsonia! Website: http://clubdoctor.com/rsgwis2007
From: Tex on 5 Dec 2007 14:33
On Dec 5, 9:53 am, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote: > On Dec 5, 9:21 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > "Robert Hamilton" <D...(a)att.net> wrote in message > > >news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net... > > > > Tex wrote: > > > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: > > >> > Chris Bellomy wrote: > > >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry > > >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. > > > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often > > >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) > > >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing? > > > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? > > > >> > > - > > > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground > > >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but > > >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean > > >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing > > >> > wrong with that. > > > >> Pot, say hello to Kettle. > > > >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics" > > >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in > > >> Mississippi ? > > > >> Tex > > > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with > > > alcohol > > > are alcoholics. > > > This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on > > someone else doesn't make sense."- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things, Well DUH. How can one "fire back" if there isn't a first shot? Jesus, edumication in MS is advancing at a rapid pace, eh Frostie? Everything you post is a "first shot"...mostly because you make grand claims, then claim everyone picks on you and just "fires back". Pointing out stupidity is not "firing back". Firing back would be say you are a fat lump of anti-social rotting flesh that couldn't hit a low 4-iron spinner out of rough under a tree and stop it on the green...anywhere from 150 to 200 yds. out. But then, I'm kinder and gentler now....so instead, you are just an asshat. Tex |