Baker is right!
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Solitude
Next: Lead Wrist Supination, trapping the ball
From: Carbon on 5 Dec 2007 17:57 On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:14:47 -0800, The_Professor wrote: > Of course the final kicker for people like you is that you post as an > anon. Only two things can cause that, and they are obviously both in > play here; you are ashamed of what you post and don't want your own > words connected to you and you are a coward, like someone is going to > care enough about you to want to go after you for some reason. Bottom > line is you post anonymously because you are a coward who is ashamed of > what you post here. How does not wanting to receive spam equate to cowardice?
From: Chris Bellomy on 5 Dec 2007 18:31 The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote: > You know, I was going to make a post about how much character you have > shown by staying out of this. Really? Have you ever posted anything similar to such a post? -- Chris Bellomy C-List Charter Member http://clist.org/
From: The_Professor on 5 Dec 2007 18:31 On Dec 5, 4:57 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:14:47 -0800, The_Professor wrote: > > Of course the final kicker for people like you is that you post as an > > anon. Only two things can cause that, and they are obviously both in > > play here; you are ashamed of what you post and don't want your own > > words connected to you and you are a coward, like someone is going to > > care enough about you to want to go after you for some reason. Bottom > > line is you post anonymously because you are a coward who is ashamed of > > what you post here. > > How does not wanting to receive spam equate to cowardice? You can post as yourself and still protect even your IP address. SPAM is not an issue with respect to cowardice here.
From: The_Professor on 5 Dec 2007 18:34 On Dec 5, 5:31 pm, Chris Bellomy <pu...(a)tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote: > The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote: > > You know, I was going to make a post about how much character you have > > shown by staying out of this. > > Really? > > Have you ever posted anything similar to such a post? Yes, I have actually; even with respect to Dalecki! Get your buddy Charbonneau to look it up for you, or send me a cheque for 50 bucks and I tell you about it!
From: The_Professor on 5 Dec 2007 18:42
On Dec 5, 1:33 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 5, 9:53 am, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 5, 9:21 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> > > wrote: > > > > "Robert Hamilton" <D...(a)att.net> wrote in message > > > >news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net... > > > > > Tex wrote: > > > > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > >> > Chris Bellomy wrote: > > > >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry > > > >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. > > > > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often > > > >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) > > > >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing? > > > > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? > > > > >> > > - > > > > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground > > > >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but > > > >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean > > > >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing > > > >> > wrong with that. > > > > >> Pot, say hello to Kettle. > > > > >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics" > > > >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in > > > >> Mississippi ? > > > > >> Tex > > > > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with > > > > alcohol > > > > are alcoholics. > > > > This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on > > > someone else doesn't make sense."- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post > > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire > > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things, > > Well DUH. How can one "fire back" if there isn't a first shot? > Jesus, edumication in MS is advancing at a rapid pace, eh Frostie? > > Everything you post is a "first shot"...mostly because you make grand > claims, then claim everyone picks on you and just "fires back". > Pointing out stupidity is not "firing back". Firing back would be say > you are a fat lump of anti-social rotting flesh that couldn't hit a > low 4-iron spinner out of rough under a tree and stop it on the > green...anywhere from 150 to 200 yds. out. > > But then, I'm kinder and gentler now....so instead, you are just an > asshat. > > Tex- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |