From: The_Professor on
On Dec 5, 1:33 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 9:53 am, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 5, 9:21 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > "Robert Hamilton" <D...(a)att.net> wrote in message
>
> > >news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net...
>
> > > > Tex wrote:
>
> > > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > > >> > Chris Bellomy wrote:
> > > >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry
> > > >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type.
>
> > > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often
> > > >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing)
> > > >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing?
>
> > > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it?
>
> > > >> > > -
>
> > > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground
> > > >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but
> > > >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean
> > > >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing
> > > >> > wrong with that.
>
> > > >> Pot, say hello to Kettle.
>
> > > >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics"
> > > >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in
> > > >> Mississippi ?
>
> > > >> Tex
>
> > > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with
> > > > alcohol
> > > > are alcoholics.
>
> > > This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on
> > > someone else doesn't make sense."- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post
> > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire
> > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things,
>
> Well DUH. How can one "fire back" if there isn't a first shot?
> Jesus, edumication in MS is advancing at a rapid pace, eh Frostie?
>
> Everything you post is a "first shot"...mostly because you make grand
> claims, then claim everyone picks on you and just "fires back".
> Pointing out stupidity is not "firing back". Firing back would be say
> you are a fat lump of anti-social rotting flesh that couldn't hit a
> low 4-iron spinner out of rough under a tree and stop it on the
> green...anywhere from 150 to 200 yds. out.
>
> But then, I'm kinder and gentler now....so instead, you are just an
> asshat.

Grand claims about what? Claiming to be a scratch golfer and then
crowing about shooting a 78 on a recreational track? You got all
jealous and envious that I can enjoy playing as a single, so you had
to fire a jab in that thread, and you are the one whining about my
firing back at you. Fire away all you want, and I'll feel free to fire
back. The only anti-social aspect of this is your name calling, but
you don't understand that, but that's OK, most of us understand.
From: Bobby Knight on
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:46:32 -0800 (PST), The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net>
wrote:

>On Dec 5, 1:33 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>Grand claims about what? Claiming to be a scratch golfer and then
>crowing about shooting a 78 on a recreational track? You got all
>jealous and envious that I can enjoy playing as a single, so you had
>to fire a jab in that thread, and you are the one whining about my
>firing back at you. Fire away all you want, and I'll feel free to fire
>back. The only anti-social aspect of this is your name calling, but
>you don't understand that, but that's OK, most of us understand.

Most of us? I count two.
bk
From: Tex on
On Dec 5, 5:46 pm, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 1:33 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 5, 9:53 am, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 5, 9:21 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > "Robert Hamilton" <D...(a)att.net> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net...
>
> > > > > Tex wrote:
>
> > > > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > > > >> > Chris Bellomy wrote:
> > > > >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > > > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry
> > > > >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type.
>
> > > > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often
> > > > >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing)
> > > > >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing?
>
> > > > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it?
>
> > > > >> > > -
>
> > > > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground
> > > > >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but
> > > > >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean
> > > > >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing
> > > > >> > wrong with that.
>
> > > > >> Pot, say hello to Kettle.
>
> > > > >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics"
> > > > >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in
> > > > >> Mississippi ?
>
> > > > >> Tex
>
> > > > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with
> > > > > alcohol
> > > > > are alcoholics.
>
> > > > This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on
> > > > someone else doesn't make sense."- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post
> > > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire
> > > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things,
>
> > Well DUH. How can one "fire back" if there isn't a first shot?
> > Jesus, edumication in MS is advancing at a rapid pace, eh Frostie?
>
> > Everything you post is a "first shot"...mostly because you make grand
> > claims, then claim everyone picks on you and just "fires back".
> > Pointing out stupidity is not "firing back". Firing back would be say
> > you are a fat lump of anti-social rotting flesh that couldn't hit a
> > low 4-iron spinner out of rough under a tree and stop it on the
> > green...anywhere from 150 to 200 yds. out.
>
> > But then, I'm kinder and gentler now....so instead, you are just an
> > asshat.
>
> Grand claims about what? Claiming to be a scratch golfer and then
> crowing about shooting a 78 on a recreational track?

When you beat 50% of the field in a USGA qualifier, give me a call.
Until then, you're an asshat.

Tex
p.s. you'll be an asshat for a long time...get used to it.

From: The_Professor on
On Dec 5, 5:53 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 5:46 pm, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 5, 1:33 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 5, 9:53 am, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 5, 9:21 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > "Robert Hamilton" <D...(a)att.net> wrote in message
>
> > > > >news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net...
>
> > > > > > Tex wrote:
>
> > > > > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > > > > >> > Chris Bellomy wrote:
> > > > > >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry
> > > > > >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type.
>
> > > > > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often
> > > > > >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing)
> > > > > >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing?
>
> > > > > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it?
>
> > > > > >> > > -
>
> > > > > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground
> > > > > >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but
> > > > > >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean
> > > > > >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing
> > > > > >> > wrong with that.
>
> > > > > >> Pot, say hello to Kettle.
>
> > > > > >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics"
> > > > > >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in
> > > > > >> Mississippi ?
>
> > > > > >> Tex
>
> > > > > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with
> > > > > > alcohol
> > > > > > are alcoholics.
>
> > > > > This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on
> > > > > someone else doesn't make sense."- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post
> > > > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire
> > > > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things,
>
> > > Well DUH. How can one "fire back" if there isn't a first shot?
> > > Jesus, edumication in MS is advancing at a rapid pace, eh Frostie?
>
> > > Everything you post is a "first shot"...mostly because you make grand
> > > claims, then claim everyone picks on you and just "fires back".
> > > Pointing out stupidity is not "firing back". Firing back would be say
> > > you are a fat lump of anti-social rotting flesh that couldn't hit a
> > > low 4-iron spinner out of rough under a tree and stop it on the
> > > green...anywhere from 150 to 200 yds. out.
>
> > > But then, I'm kinder and gentler now....so instead, you are just an
> > > asshat.
>
> > Grand claims about what? Claiming to be a scratch golfer and then
> > crowing about shooting a 78 on a recreational track?
>
> When you beat 50% of the field in a USGA qualifier, give me a call.
> Until then, you're an asshat.
>

Blow hard on that, it's all you got. You shot a 75 in a USGA
qualifying round one time. One thing for sure, you'll never play
anywhwere near your blowhard USGA index in any USGA event, and I'll
win exactly as many USGA qualifiers in my life as you will.
From: Tex on
On Dec 5, 6:19 pm, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 5:53 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 5, 5:46 pm, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 5, 1:33 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 5, 9:53 am, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 5, 9:21 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > "Robert Hamilton" <D...(a)att.net> wrote in message
>
> > > > > >news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net...
>
> > > > > > > Tex wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > Chris Bellomy wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry
> > > > > > >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type.
>
> > > > > > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often
> > > > > > >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing)
> > > > > > >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing?
>
> > > > > > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it?
>
> > > > > > >> > > -
>
> > > > > > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground
> > > > > > >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but
> > > > > > >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean
> > > > > > >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing
> > > > > > >> > wrong with that.
>
> > > > > > >> Pot, say hello to Kettle.
>
> > > > > > >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics"
> > > > > > >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in
> > > > > > >> Mississippi ?
>
> > > > > > >> Tex
>
> > > > > > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with
> > > > > > > alcohol
> > > > > > > are alcoholics.
>
> > > > > > This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on
> > > > > > someone else doesn't make sense."- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post
> > > > > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire
> > > > > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things,
>
> > > > Well DUH. How can one "fire back" if there isn't a first shot?
> > > > Jesus, edumication in MS is advancing at a rapid pace, eh Frostie?
>
> > > > Everything you post is a "first shot"...mostly because you make grand
> > > > claims, then claim everyone picks on you and just "fires back".
> > > > Pointing out stupidity is not "firing back". Firing back would be say
> > > > you are a fat lump of anti-social rotting flesh that couldn't hit a
> > > > low 4-iron spinner out of rough under a tree and stop it on the
> > > > green...anywhere from 150 to 200 yds. out.
>
> > > > But then, I'm kinder and gentler now....so instead, you are just an
> > > > asshat.
>
> > > Grand claims about what? Claiming to be a scratch golfer and then
> > > crowing about shooting a 78 on a recreational track?
>
> > When you beat 50% of the field in a USGA qualifier, give me a call.
> > Until then, you're an asshat.
>
> Blow hard on that, it's all you got. You shot a 75 in a USGA
> qualifying round one time. One thing for sure, you'll never play
> anywhwere near your blowhard USGA index in any USGA event, and I'll
> win exactly as many USGA qualifiers in my life as you will.

It's not all I got...but you seem fixated on the big time
events...which of course, you've never entered, nor will you ever
enter.

If you think my game is fake, challenge me. Oh wait, you've done that
before as an anonymous coward...gee, just like the anon's you talk
about now.

Tex

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: Solitude
Next: Lead Wrist Supination, trapping the ball