From: John van der Pflum on
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:37:23 -0000, Chris Bellomy
<puevf(a)tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:

>John van der Pflum <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:37:13 -0000, Chris Bellomy
>> <puevf(a)tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Robert Hamilton <DBID(a)att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If Baker will lay off the Larry
>>>> type, I will lay off the Dalecki type.
>>>
>>>Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often
>>>insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing)
>>>if they, too, are to do a similar thing?
>>
>> I'll pollute less if you do, Chris.
>
>You couldn't pollute less. HA!

I drive a 20 year old sports car and waste water with two large
aquariums. Of course I could pollute less.
--
jvdp
http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
From: Chris Bellomy on
The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 5:31 pm, Chris Bellomy <pu...(a)tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
>> The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
>> > You know, I was going to make a post about how much character you have
>> > shown by staying out of this.
>>
>> Really?
>>
>> Have you ever posted anything similar to such a post?
>
> Yes, I have actually; even with respect to Dalecki! Get your buddy
> Charbonneau to look it up for you, or send me a cheque for 50 bucks
> and I tell you about it!

Well, this has ventured into "proving a negative" territory, so
I'll let it drop. But I will note that I've never seen any sort
of conciliatory post from you that wasn't prompted by someone
else saying something positive (or at least benign) about you.
I don't believe that you were really about to write such a post
about Mike in this thread. Sorry.

--
Chris Bellomy
C-List Charter Member
http://clist.org/
From: assimilate on

On 5-Dec-2007, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote:

> "The_Professor" <dbid(a)att.net> wrote in message
> news:46bb0c54-e4ae-441b-a7ac-7669c4b7a9ec(a)y43g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post
> > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire
> > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things, BTW, but
> > apparently a number of people here are consumed with what I post
> > here...they just can't lay off it..people like you, for example!
>
> I enjoy seeing the gnashing of teeth and the spewing of venom. Nothing
> personal.

Who really comes here for golf discussion afterall? ;-D

--
bill-o
Play the ball as it lies.
Play the course as you find it.
And if you can�t do either, do what is fair.
From: Robert Hamilton on


Tex wrote:

> On Dec 5, 6:19 pm, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > On Dec 5, 5:53 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 5, 5:46 pm, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Dec 5, 1:33 pm, Tex <marktexkoe...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Dec 5, 9:53 am, The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Dec 5, 9:21 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > "Robert Hamilton" <D...(a)att.net> wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > >news:4755F9A1.DEE69248(a)att.net...
> >
> > > > > > > > Tex wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >> On Dec 4, 4:59 pm, Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > Chris Bellomy wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > > Robert Hamilton <D...(a)att.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >> > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry
> > > > > > > >> > > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type.
> >
> > > > > > > >> > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often
> > > > > > > >> > > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing)
> > > > > > > >> > > if they, too, are to do a similar thing?
> >
> > > > > > > >> > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it?
> >
> > > > > > > >> > > -
> >
> > > > > > > >> > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground
> > > > > > > >> > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but
> > > > > > > >> > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean
> > > > > > > >> > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing
> > > > > > > >> > wrong with that.
> >
> > > > > > > >> Pot, say hello to Kettle.
> >
> > > > > > > >> "Dalecki type", "Tex type", "golfer's who drink beer are alcoholics"
> > > > > > > >> Just how many generalizations are taught in primary school in
> > > > > > > >> Mississippi ?
> >
> > > > > > > >> Tex
> >
> > > > > > > > Just to get the generalization right. People who associate golf with
> > > > > > > > alcohol
> > > > > > > > are alcoholics.
> >
> > > > > > > This gets us back to Bill's comment, "your "good" behavior depends on
> > > > > > > someone else doesn't make sense."- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > Bill's comment was about taking jabs. All I replied was that his post
> > > > > > was one too late. If Tex doesn't fire the first shot, I don't fire
> > > > > > back. I rarely fire the first shot in these things,
> >
> > > > > Well DUH. How can one "fire back" if there isn't a first shot?
> > > > > Jesus, edumication in MS is advancing at a rapid pace, eh Frostie?
> >
> > > > > Everything you post is a "first shot"...mostly because you make grand
> > > > > claims, then claim everyone picks on you and just "fires back".
> > > > > Pointing out stupidity is not "firing back". Firing back would be say
> > > > > you are a fat lump of anti-social rotting flesh that couldn't hit a
> > > > > low 4-iron spinner out of rough under a tree and stop it on the
> > > > > green...anywhere from 150 to 200 yds. out.
> >
> > > > > But then, I'm kinder and gentler now....so instead, you are just an
> > > > > asshat.
> >
> > > > Grand claims about what? Claiming to be a scratch golfer and then
> > > > crowing about shooting a 78 on a recreational track?
> >
> > > When you beat 50% of the field in a USGA qualifier, give me a call.
> > > Until then, you're an asshat.
> >
> > Blow hard on that, it's all you got. You shot a 75 in a USGA
> > qualifying round one time. One thing for sure, you'll never play
> > anywhwere near your blowhard USGA index in any USGA event, and I'll
> > win exactly as many USGA qualifiers in my life as you will.
>
> It's not all I got...but you seem fixated on the big time
> events...which of course, you've never entered, nor will you ever
> enter.
>
> If you think my game is fake, challenge me. Oh wait, you've done that
> before as an anonymous coward...gee, just like the anon's you talk
> about now.
>

That's hilarious. The big thing your little group of trolls doesn't like about me is that I
don't think the rounds you go on and on about are any more significant than any other round
played by any other recreational golfer.

You chiding me becuae you are a better golfer than me is like me getting all over William
The Refirgerator Perry because he is fat; myself being so thin in comaprison. Of course if
your handicap is real at 2, then you can give me 12 strokes. If you can't, and you can't,
you are a phoney.


From: the Moderator on

"The_Professor" <dbid(a)att.net> wrote in message
news:31d66d28-724d-4512-985f-b5bf723ce3a2(a)i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 5, 11:28 am, "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I enjoy seeing the gnashing of teeth and the spewing of venom. Nothing
>> personal.
>
>
> I see it as personal. Ther topic here is the fact that I see a
> similarity between how Baker views Larry and how I view Dalecki. We
> both see our antagonists as blowhards. I should lay off Dalecki, and
> he should lay off Larry. Who cares if they are blowhards?
>
> As for you and the teeth gnashing thing, that's a sign of jealousy and
> envy. However, you are the one concerned about what I am doing here,
> and I am just defending myself from your jabs. Same with the solitude
> thread; you are concerned about me. You are the one doing the gnashing
> here. Now if I ever jump in on some thread you start where you talk
> about what you are doing and I take jabs at you, then I would be
> gnashing my teeth about what you do.
>
> Of course the final kicker for people like you is that you post as an
> anon. Only two things can cause that, and they are obviously both in
> play here; you are ashamed of what you post and don't want your own
> words connected to you and you are a coward, like someone is going to
> care enough about you to want to go after you for some reason. Bottom
> line is you post anonymously because you are a coward who is ashamed
> of what you post here.

Of course you see it as personal. You think everyone is concerned about
you. and you are the one making the personal attacks.

Regrettably you are not ashamed of it.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: Solitude
Next: Lead Wrist Supination, trapping the ball