Baker is right!
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Solitude
Next: Lead Wrist Supination, trapping the ball
From: Robert Hamilton on 4 Dec 2007 17:22 You know, come to think of it, Baker is right when he says I am a hypocrit. The things he says are "facts" about Larry, I see as "facts" about Dalecki, andf I have responded to Dalecki as Baker responds to Larry. Of course Larry doesn't get together some group of friends and decide to "go after" people (like me!) who call him on his blowhard posts, but nonetheless the both do greatly overstate their expertise on golf related matters here, and I react more to the Dalecki type while Baker reacts more to the Baker type. If Baker will lay off the Larry type, I will lay off the Dalecki type.
From: Chris Bellomy on 4 Dec 2007 17:37 Robert Hamilton <DBID(a)att.net> wrote: > If Baker will lay off the Larry > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) if they, too, are to do a similar thing? If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? -- Chris Bellomy C-List Charter Member http://clist.org/
From: Robert Hamilton on 4 Dec 2007 17:59 Chris Bellomy wrote: > Robert Hamilton <DBID(a)att.net> wrote: > > > If Baker will lay off the Larry > > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) > if they, too, are to do a similar thing? > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? > > - ....and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing wrong with that.
From: Kommienezuspadt on 4 Dec 2007 18:38 "Chris Bellomy" <puevf(a)tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in message news:0T4k79mgIj31N34(a)redshark.goodshow.net... > Robert Hamilton <DBID(a)att.net> wrote: > >> If Baker will lay off the Larry >> type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. > > Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often > insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) > if they, too, are to do a similar thing? > > If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? > That is a wise post & concisely stated -- therefore it has no chance of working. > -- > Chris Bellomy > C-List Charter Member > http://clist.org/
From: Kommienezuspadt on 4 Dec 2007 18:39
"Robert Hamilton" <DBID(a)att.net> wrote in message news:4755DABB.8E90CAAD(a)att.net... > > > Chris Bellomy wrote: > >> Robert Hamilton <DBID(a)att.net> wrote: >> >> > If Baker will lay off the Larry >> > type, I will lay off the Dalecki type. >> >> Not directed at you, specifically, but why do people so often >> insist that someone else do a good thing (or the right thing) >> if they, too, are to do a similar thing? >> >> If something is the best thing to do, why not just do it? >> >> - > > ...and why not direct this at Baker? Y'all could take the high ground > here! ..but you won't. It'll be the Tex type can fire out his jabs but > the target is not supposed to respond. In any event, it doesn't mean > much, anyone who fires a jab sets themselves up for a reply; nothing > wrong with that. > > Funny stuff guy! You made the post -- you made the statement -- but you want him to reply to someone else --- |