From: Tristan daCunha on 21 Jun 2010 17:35 Yeah F---K Tigah!!!!
From: Tristan daCunha on 21 Jun 2010 17:36 No,it means he ain't the mongrel Woods!
From: John B. on 21 Jun 2010 17:41 On Jun 21, 9:31 am, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote: > In article <wlJTn.30674$%u7....(a)newsfe14.iad>, > "Frank Ketchum" <nos...(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: > > > > > > > "William Clark" <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >news:wclark2-B86C83.08301621062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > In article <888j9hF65...(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > >> Happy Father's Day to all of your sperm donors out there! > > > >> What a terrific day! My M's swept the Reds and Tiger lost!! > > >> Today....life be good!!! > > > >> -Greg > > > > And a Brit won in the US for the third week in a row! Oh, dear. > > > Why is that so fascinating to you? You mentioned the possibility of it > > happening last week (although you certainly weren't talking about that brit > > now were you?). Am I missing something? Why is this a big deal? > > Oh, just because it irritates the hell out of wingnut fanboys like you, > doesn't it ?-). As I said, I picked an Ulsterman to win - just not quite > the right one :-). If you learn your golf at Royal Portrush, then you > know all about playing in the wind at ocean courses. Seems that made a > difference - he was able to keep his head while all about him were > losing theirs, such as that smart play on 18. Are Irish people allowed to play there, or just royalists?
From: William Clark on 21 Jun 2010 18:11 In article <CRKTn.39459$TL5.3072(a)newsfe24.iad>, "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: > "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:wclark2-7CDCC7.09314321062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > In article <wlJTn.30674$%u7.454(a)newsfe14.iad>, > > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: > > > >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >> news:wclark2-B86C83.08301621062010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > In article <888j9hF65pU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Happy Father's Day to all of your sperm donors out there! > >> >> > >> >> What a terrific day! My M's swept the Reds and Tiger lost!! > >> >> Today....life be good!!! > >> >> > >> >> -Greg > >> > > >> > And a Brit won in the US for the third week in a row! Oh, dear. > >> > >> Why is that so fascinating to you? You mentioned the possibility of it > >> happening last week (although you certainly weren't talking about that > >> brit > >> now were you?). Am I missing something? Why is this a big deal? > > > > Oh, just because it irritates the hell out of wingnut fanboys like you, > > doesn't it ?-). > > Umm, not particularly. Well, you bite. Every time :-) > > > > As I said, I picked an Ulsterman to win - just not quite > > the right one :-). > > I picked a golfer to win. I guess we were both right by those standards. Except mine was a lot more particular than yours.
From: William Clark on 21 Jun 2010 18:12
In article <8oiv169o8vllvtqpu2qn4e9i7vk5r60efd(a)4ax.com>, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:53:57 -0700, "zox625" <a46668(a)webnntp.invalid> > wrote: > > >It wasn't like you had to be a genius to lay up on 18 after the Havret > >missed his birdie putt. Actually I thought Havret had the steadiest game > >of all of the leaders; he just didn't win because he started back too far > >from the lead. But no meltdown from McDowell on any hole, and he deserved > >to win. > > I observed to others watching the tournament, that McDowell wasn't > going to lose the US Open. Someone else had to win it. Els almost > did, but McDowell did what he needed to do, steady and safe. Which is typically what prevails on the final day of US Open courses. I don't know why the so-called "experts" think this was dull golf, because no one made a charge. On this course, under these conditions, I'd like to see them do it. |