Dumb Dems
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Tiger is Cabalasian... Obama is a Mulatto
Next: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
From: Jack Hollis on 26 Sep 2008 19:40 On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:26:20 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >Can you imagine the absurdity if anyone on the board cared about Canadian >politics, much less picked fights about it. One could write an extensive history of the world and never mention Canada. The only interesting thing that I know of in Canadian politics is the Quebec separatists. My sympathy is with them all the way. Vive le Qu�bec libre !
From: Alan Baker on 26 Sep 2008 19:43 In article <basqd4tvf44mp5j6pv7l04eb54h2jqevcv(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:26:20 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> > wrote: > > >Can you imagine the absurdity if anyone on the board cared about Canadian > >politics, much less picked fights about it. > > One could write an extensive history of the world and never mention > Canada. And if you're a typical american, it would also be true that you couldn't write the history about any other country in the world, because the typical american is ignorant of pretty much the entire world. It's not something to celebrate... > > The only interesting thing that I know of in Canadian politics is the > Quebec separatists. My sympathy is with them all the way. How's your sympathy with Alaskan separatists? <snip> -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Jack Hollis on 26 Sep 2008 19:46 On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:36:18 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: >> > It was a stupid question. >> >> Bingo! > >How was it stupid to ask a Republican candidate about a Republican >president's philosophies? If he wanted to know her opinion on preemptive strikes against terrorists and the nations that sponsor them, he should have asker her that. The stupid question did more to hurt his reputation than hers.
From: Alan Baker on 26 Sep 2008 19:47 In article <lrsqd4183ls75bd5evmveikuakduk2ft43(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:36:18 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > wrote: > > >> > It was a stupid question. > >> > >> Bingo! > > > >How was it stupid to ask a Republican candidate about a Republican > >president's philosophies? > > If he wanted to know her opinion on preemptive strikes against > terrorists and the nations that sponsor them, he should have asker her > that. Why would he have had reason to suspect that she wouldn't know what the Bush doctrine was? Hell, I'm not running for one of the highest offices in the land and *I* know what it is. > > The stupid question did more to hurt his reputation than hers. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Carbon on 26 Sep 2008 21:04
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:59:03 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:48dc2bf1$0$4867$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:54:35 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> "R&B" wrote: >>>> "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message >>>> news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... >>>>> "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>>>> message >>>>> news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>>> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" >>>>>> <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: >>>>>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know >>>>>>>> who Roosevelt was. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fuckhead. >>>>>> >>>>>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. >>>>> >>>>> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? >>>>> How is that informed debate? >>>> >>>> She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high >>>> school kid who studies Civics knows that. >>>> >>>> Gimme a break. >>> >>> Can you specifically identify what the Bush doctrine? As described by >>> Bush himself? >> >> You're assuming Bush understands what the Bush Doctrine is. Why? As you >> know, questions like this are normally answered by one of the many >> Neocon ideologues on his staff. Bush has more important things to do, >> like set the record for Presidential vacation days. > > Nice dodge. It's the truth. |