Prev: Tiger is Cabalasian... Obama is a Mulatto
Next: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
From: The_Professor on 25 Sep 2008 16:33 On Sep 25, 3:17 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article > <e31b751d-a268-4b2f-9f12-24e48d798...(a)a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Sep 25, 3:06 pm, "\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message > > > >news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... > > > > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > > > message > > > >news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, > > > >> "Stapler" <stap...(a)tmp.com> wrote: > > > > >>> William Clark wrote: > > > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...(a)att.net>, The Professor <D...(a)att..net> > > > >>> > wrote: > > > > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > > > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna > > > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that > > > >>> >> already too? > > > > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > > > > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who > > > >>> > Roosevelt was. > > > > >>> Fuckhead. > > > > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > > > > > Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How is > > > > that informed debate? > > > > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school kid > > > who studies Civics knows that. > > > > Gimme a break. > > > > randy- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Show me a statement, and statement Bush issued as a doctrine. Good > > luck! Post the URL. I am not interested in some policy statement a > > commentator like Chuckie Gibson would call a doctrine...either the > > Bush Whitehouse isssued a doctrine, calling it such, or they didn't. > > Seems to me they didn't and Chucko was dipping a little too much into > > the absinthe when he imagined this doctrine! > > "doctrine |?d?ktrin| > noun > a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, > or other group : the doctrine of predestination. > a stated principle of government policy, mainly in foreign or military > affairs : the Monroe Doctrine. > ORIGIN late Middle English : from Old French, from Latin doctrina > teaching, learning,¹ from doctor teacher,¹ from docere teach..¹" > > <http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/> > > -- > Alan Baker > Vancouver, British Columbia > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - What a lame response. You can cut and paste from an online dicrioanry. Problem with going general is that by that standard, there are dozens of Bush Doctrines, so the issue beciomes which one. The Chuckster did not articulate anything (as he did as moderator of a debate...he articulated the specific Bush Doctrine his mind conjured up). You should be concerned about the Canadian election though. I think it's important to elect someone who will take even more money from people who work and give it to people who don't want to work. It's what government in Canada is all about! Keep that "progressive" tradition going!
From: MNMikeW on 25 Sep 2008 17:21 ""R&B"" <noneofyourbusiness(a)all.com> wrote in message news:A9CdnV1QFIOLckbVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d(a)giganews.com... > "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message > news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... >> >> "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> message >> news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, >>> "Stapler" <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> William Clark wrote: >>>> > In article <48DADA61.9C8629D8(a)att.net>, The Professor <DBID(a)att.net> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President >>>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna >>>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that >>>> >> already too? >>>> >> >>>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? >>>> > >>>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who >>>> > Roosevelt was. >>>> >>>> Fuckhead. >>> >>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. >> >> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How >> is that informed debate? > > > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school > kid who studies Civics knows that. > > Gimme a break. > > randy > The so-called "Bush Doctrine" was actually three different things.
From: Jack Hollis on 25 Sep 2008 18:20 On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:33:39 -0700 (PDT), The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote: >The Chuckster did >not articulate anything (as he did as moderator of a debate...he >articulated the specific Bush Doctrine his mind conjured up). It was a stupid question.
From: Carbon on 25 Sep 2008 18:39 On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:45:14 -0500, the Moderator wrote: > "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > message > news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" >> <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: >>> William Clark wrote: >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C8629D8(a)att.net>, The Professor <DBID(a)att.net> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done >>> >> that already too? >>> >> >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? >>> > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who >>> > Roosevelt was. >>> >>> Fuckhead. >> >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > > Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? Well, does she? She doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is, and that's a hell of a lot more current.
From: Alan Baker on 25 Sep 2008 19:06
In article <94e02989-c0c3-48a5-a3e2-dc259122a6eb(a)k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote: > On Sep 25, 3:17�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article > > <e31b751d-a268-4b2f-9f12-24e48d798...(a)a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > �The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > On Sep 25, 3:06�pm, "\"R&B\"" <noneofyourbusin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > > "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message > > > > > >news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... > > > > > > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > > > > message > > > > >news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, > > > > >> "Stapler" <stap...(a)tmp.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>> William Clark wrote: > > > > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...(a)att.net>, The Professor > > > > >>> > <D...(a)att.net> > > > > >>> > wrote: > > > > > > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > > > > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he > > > > >>> >> gonna > > > > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done > > > > >>> >> that > > > > >>> >> already too? > > > > > > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > > > > > > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know > > > > >>> > who > > > > >>> > Roosevelt was. > > > > > > >>> Fuckhead. > > > > > > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > > > > > > > Informed debate? �You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? > > > > > �How is > > > > > that informed debate? > > > > > > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. �Any junior high school > > > > kid > > > > who studies Civics knows that. > > > > > > Gimme a break. > > > > > > randy- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Show me a �statement, and statement Bush issued as a doctrine. Good > > > luck! Post the URL. I am not interested in some policy statement a > > > commentator like Chuckie Gibson would call a doctrine...either the > > > Bush Whitehouse isssued a doctrine, calling it such, or they didn't. > > > Seems to me they didn't and Chucko was dipping a little too much into > > > the absinthe when he imagined this doctrine! > > > > "doctrine |?d?ktrin| > > noun > > a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, > > or other group : the doctrine of predestination. > > � a stated principle of government policy, mainly in foreign or military > > affairs : the Monroe Doctrine. > > ORIGIN late Middle English : from Old French, from Latin doctrina > > �teaching, learning,1 from doctor �teacher,1 from docere �teach.1" > > > > <http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/> > > > > -- > > Alan Baker > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>- Hide quoted > > text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > What a lame response. You can cut and paste from an online dicrioanry. > Problem with going general is that by that standard, there are dozens > of Bush Doctrines, so the issue beciomes which one. The Chuckster did > not articulate anything (as he did as moderator of a debate...he > articulated the specific Bush Doctrine his mind conjured up). That was what the official Whitehouse link was for, "Professor"... > > You should be concerned about the Canadian election though. I think > it's important to elect someone who will take even more money from > people who work and give it to people who don't want to work. It's > what government in Canada is all about! Keep that "progressive" > tradition going! I agree that's a bad idea, "Professor". See what you get for assuming you know what my politics are? |