Dumb Dems
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Tiger is Cabalasian... Obama is a Mulatto
Next: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
From: Alan Baker on 25 Sep 2008 19:06 In article <6k2dmrF5p59fU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ""R&B"" <noneofyourbusiness(a)all.com> wrote in message > news:A9CdnV1QFIOLckbVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d(a)giganews.com... > > "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message > > news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... > >> > >> "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> message > >> news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, > >>> "Stapler" <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> William Clark wrote: > >>>> > In article <48DADA61.9C8629D8(a)att.net>, The Professor <DBID(a)att.net> > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > >>>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna > >>>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that > >>>> >> already too? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > >>>> > > >>>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who > >>>> > Roosevelt was. > >>>> > >>>> Fuckhead. > >>> > >>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > >> > >> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How > >> is that informed debate? > > > > > > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school > > kid who studies Civics knows that. > > > > Gimme a break. > > > > randy > > > The so-called "Bush Doctrine" was actually three different things. Really? What do you claim they were, these three things?
From: William Clark on 25 Sep 2008 19:50 In article <6k2dmrF5p59fU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > ""R&B"" <noneofyourbusiness(a)all.com> wrote in message > news:A9CdnV1QFIOLckbVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d(a)giganews.com... > > "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message > > news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... > >> > >> "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> message > >> news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, > >>> "Stapler" <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> William Clark wrote: > >>>> > In article <48DADA61.9C8629D8(a)att.net>, The Professor <DBID(a)att.net> > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > >>>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna > >>>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that > >>>> >> already too? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > >>>> > > >>>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who > >>>> > Roosevelt was. > >>>> > >>>> Fuckhead. > >>> > >>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > >> > >> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How > >> is that informed debate? > > > > > > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school > > kid who studies Civics knows that. > > > > Gimme a break. > > > > randy > > > The so-called "Bush Doctrine" was actually three different things. And she didn't know any one of them.
From: BAR on 25 Sep 2008 19:54 "R&B" wrote: > "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message > news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... >> "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> message >> news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, >>> "Stapler" <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>> In article <48DADA61.9C8629D8(a)att.net>, The Professor <DBID(a)att.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President >>>>>> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna >>>>>> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that >>>>>> already too? >>>>>> >>>>>> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? >>>>> There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who >>>>> Roosevelt was. >>>> Fuckhead. >>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. >> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How is >> that informed debate? > > > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school kid > who studies Civics knows that. > > Gimme a break. Can you specifically identify what the Bush doctrine? As described by Bush himself?
From: Carbon on 25 Sep 2008 20:25 On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:54:35 -0400, BAR wrote: > "R&B" wrote: >> "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message >> news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... >>> "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>> message >>> news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" >>>> <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: >>>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who >>>>>> Roosevelt was. >>>>> >>>>> Fuckhead. >>>> >>>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. >>> >>> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? >>> How is that informed debate? >> >> She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school >> kid who studies Civics knows that. >> >> Gimme a break. > > Can you specifically identify what the Bush doctrine? As described by > Bush himself? You're assuming Bush understands what the Bush Doctrine is. Why? As you know, questions like this are normally answered by one of the many Neocon ideologues on his staff. Bush has more important things to do, like set the record for Presidential vacation days.
From: Alan Baker on 25 Sep 2008 20:57
In article <weudncdg8_eKuEHVnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d(a)comcast.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > "R&B" wrote: > > "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message > > news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... > >> "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> message > >> news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >>> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, > >>> "Stapler" <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> William Clark wrote: > >>>>> In article <48DADA61.9C8629D8(a)att.net>, The Professor <DBID(a)att.net> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > >>>>>> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna > >>>>>> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done that > >>>>>> already too? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > >>>>> There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who > >>>>> Roosevelt was. > >>>> Fuckhead. > >>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > >> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? How is > >> that informed debate? > > > > > > She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school kid > > who studies Civics knows that. > > > > Gimme a break. > > Can you specifically identify what the Bush doctrine? As described by > Bush himself? "For much of the last century, America's defense relied on the Cold War doctrines of deterrence and containment. In some cases, those strategies still apply. But new threats also require new thinking. Deterrence -- the promise of massive retaliation against nations -- means nothing against shadowy terrorist networks with no nation or citizens to defend. Containment is not possible when unbalanced dictators with weapons of mass destruction can deliver those weapons on missiles or secretly provide them to terrorist allies. We cannot defend America and our friends by hoping for the best. We cannot put our faith in the word of tyrants, who solemnly sign non-proliferation treaties, and then systemically break them. If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long. Homeland defense and missile defense are part of stronger security, and they're essential priorities for America. Yet the war on terror will not be won on the defensive. We must take the battle to the enemy, disrupt his plans, and confront the worst threats before they emerge. In the world we have entered, the only path to safety is the path of action. And this nation will act. Our security will require the best intelligence, to reveal threats hidden in caves and growing in laboratories. Our security will require modernizing domestic agencies such as the FBI, so they're prepared to act, and act quickly, against danger. Our security will require transforming the military you will lead -- a military that must be ready to strike at a moment's notice in any dark corner of the world. And our security will require all Americans to be forward-looking and resolute, to be ready for preemptive action when necessary to defend our liberty and to defend our lives. (Applause.)" <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20020601-3.html> "To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively in exercising our inherent right of self-defense." <http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/nss2006.pdf> Specific enough for you? Too bad you can't slough it off by attacking the source, huh? |