Dumb Dems
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Tiger is Cabalasian... Obama is a Mulatto
Next: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
From: The_Professor on 25 Sep 2008 22:46 On Sep 25, 9:20 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > Nope. I'm not in the least concerned with the U.S. elections. I'm having > some fun with a bunch of hypocrites.- Hide quoted text - One thing for sure. You've clearly joined the club.
From: The_Professor on 25 Sep 2008 22:47 On Sep 25, 9:21 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article > <ec41e2b7-02f3-4d08-987a-086e10c38...(a)a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote: > > On Sep 25, 5:39 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:45:14 -0500, the Moderator wrote: > > > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > > > message > > > >news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" > > > >> <stap...(a)tmp.com> wrote: > > > >>> William Clark wrote: > > > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...(a)att.net>, The Professor <D...(a)att..net> > > > >>> > wrote: > > > > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > > > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he gonna > > > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done > > > >>> >> that already too? > > > > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > > > > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who > > > >>> > Roosevelt was. > > > > >>> Fuckhead. > > > > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > > > > > Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? > > > > Well, does she? She doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is, and > > > that's a hell of a lot more current.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > There is no Bush Doctrine. There is only Charleski asking Bush > > questions. > > There is indeed a Bush doctrine. > > It details a philosophy that says the U.S. is allowed to unilaterally > and pre-emptively attack sovereign nations when it feels like it > (essentially).- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The link you gave me was the national security strategy. Not the Bush Doctrine. If some loon wants to call it the Bush Doctrinem, that's no big deal, but to expect anyone else to recognize the reference is loony. If Gibby really wanted to refer to the National Security Strategy, how could have don ehtat. He didn't, so wither he is an inarticulate boob, or he was referring to something else.
From: Alan Baker on 25 Sep 2008 23:21 In article <9e8c5fee-377c-4058-b4b0-316fda08c69d(a)v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote: > On Sep 25, 9:21�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article > > <ec41e2b7-02f3-4d08-987a-086e10c38...(a)a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > �The_Professor <d...(a)att.net> wrote: > > > On Sep 25, 5:39�pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:45:14 -0500, the Moderator wrote: > > > > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > > > > > message > > > > >news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > > > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" > > > > >> <stap...(a)tmp.com> wrote: > > > > >>> William Clark wrote: > > > > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...(a)att.net>, The Professor > > > > >>> > <D...(a)att.net> > > > > >>> > wrote: > > > > > > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > > > > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he > > > > >>> >> gonna > > > > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done > > > > >>> >> that already too? > > > > > > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > > > > > > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know > > > > >>> > who > > > > >>> > Roosevelt was. > > > > > > >>> Fuckhead. > > > > > > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > > > > > > > Informed debate? �You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? > > > > > > Well, does she? She doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is, and > > > > that's a hell of a lot more current.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > There is no Bush Doctrine. There is only Charleski asking Bush > > > questions. > > > > There is indeed a Bush doctrine. > > > > It details a philosophy that says the U.S. is allowed to unilaterally > > and pre-emptively attack sovereign nations when it feels like it > > (essentially).- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > The link you gave me was the national security strategy. Not the Bush > Doctrine. If some loon wants to call it the Bush Doctrinem, that's no > big deal, but to expect anyone else to recognize the reference is > loony. If Gibby really wanted to refer to the National Security > Strategy, how could have don ehtat. He didn't, so wither he is an > inarticulate boob, or he was referring to something else. The link gives you a document which articulates the Bush doctrine. Elsewhere, you can find links to quotes that expand on it. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Alan Baker on 25 Sep 2008 23:21 In article <1f6c65ef-17f2-4737-9f22-048035be4e55(a)z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote: > On Sep 25, 9:20�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > > > Nope. I'm not in the least concerned with the U.S. elections. I'm having > > some fun with a bunch of hypocrites.- Hide quoted text - > > One thing for sure. You've clearly joined the club. I have no idea what you're talking about. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Carbon on 25 Sep 2008 23:26
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:34:22 -0400, \"R&B\" wrote: > Bush was the first American president to invade a sovereign nation > without first being attacked by them. I'll take "what is the Bush doctrine" for $2000, Alex. |