Dumb Dems
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Tiger is Cabalasian... Obama is a Mulatto
Next: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
From: MNMikeW on 26 Sep 2008 08:59 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:48dc2bf1$0$4867$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:54:35 -0400, BAR wrote: >> "R&B" wrote: >>> "the Moderator" <sparky(a)no_spam_engineer.com> wrote in message >>> news:kpadnfxJ4ZZ3CEbVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d(a)centurytel.net... >>>> "William A. T. Clark" <clark(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >>>> message >>>> news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >>>>> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw.879(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" >>>>> <staples(a)tmp.com> wrote: >>>>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know who >>>>>>> Roosevelt was. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fuckhead. >>>>> >>>>> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. >>>> >>>> Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? >>>> How is that informed debate? >>> >>> She didn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is. Any junior high school >>> kid who studies Civics knows that. >>> >>> Gimme a break. >> >> Can you specifically identify what the Bush doctrine? As described by >> Bush himself? > > You're assuming Bush understands what the Bush Doctrine is. Why? As you > know, questions like this are normally answered by one of the many Neocon > ideologues on his staff. Bush has more important things to do, like set > the record for Presidential vacation days. Nice dodge.
From: Alan Baker on 26 Sep 2008 11:54 In article <6k448bF61j3hU2(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-87BD80.19212725092008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]... > > In article > > <ec41e2b7-02f3-4d08-987a-086e10c38b4a(a)a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > > The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 25, 5:39 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:45:14 -0500, the Moderator wrote: > >> > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in > >> > > message > >> > >news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" > >> > >> <stap...(a)tmp.com> wrote: > >> > >>> William Clark wrote: > >> > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...(a)att.net>, The Professor > >> > >>> > <D...(a)att.net> > >> > >>> > wrote: > >> > > >> > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > >> > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he > >> > >>> >> gonna > >> > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he done > >> > >>> >> that already too? > >> > > >> > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > >> > > >> > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know > >> > >>> > who > >> > >>> > Roosevelt was. > >> > > >> > >>> Fuckhead. > >> > > >> > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > >> > > >> > > Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? > >> > > >> > Well, does she? She doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is, and > >> > that's a hell of a lot more current.- Hide quoted text - > >> > > >> > - Show quoted text - > >> > >> There is no Bush Doctrine. There is only Charleski asking Bush > >> questions. > > > > There is indeed a Bush doctrine. > > > > It details a philosophy that says the U.S. is allowed to unilaterally > > and pre-emptively attack sovereign nations when it feels like it > > (essentially). > > That's one version. By all means, describe another... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Michael Anselmo on 26 Sep 2008 13:16 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-308940.08543326092008(a)shawnews.vc.shawcable.net... > In article <6k448bF61j3hU2(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> news:alangbaker-87BD80.19212725092008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]... >> > In article >> > <ec41e2b7-02f3-4d08-987a-086e10c38b4a(a)a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, >> > The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote: >> > >> >> On Sep 25, 5:39 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:45:14 -0500, the Moderator wrote: >> >> > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote >> >> > > in >> >> > > message >> >> > >news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" >> >> > >> <stap...(a)tmp.com> wrote: >> >> > >>> William Clark wrote: >> >> > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...(a)att.net>, The Professor >> >> > >>> > <D...(a)att.net> >> >> > >>> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President >> >> > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he >> >> > >>> >> gonna >> >> > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he >> >> > >>> >> done >> >> > >>> >> that already too? >> >> > >> >> > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? >> >> > >> >> > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know >> >> > >>> > who >> >> > >>> > Roosevelt was. >> >> > >> >> > >>> Fuckhead. >> >> > >> >> > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. >> >> > >> >> > > Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? >> >> > >> >> > Well, does she? She doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is, and >> >> > that's a hell of a lot more current.- Hide quoted text - >> >> > >> >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> There is no Bush Doctrine. There is only Charleski asking Bush >> >> questions. >> > >> > There is indeed a Bush doctrine. >> > >> > It details a philosophy that says the U.S. is allowed to unilaterally >> > and pre-emptively attack sovereign nations when it feels like it >> > (essentially). >> >> That's one version. > > By all means, describe another... > > -- > Alan Baker > Vancouver, British Columbia > Great thread. Joe Biden says something very stupid. Someone points it out. The bashing of Palin starts. The bashing of Bush starts. Typical liberals. Biden and 0bama can do no wrong. Even if they say in on TV with witnesses.
From: the Moderator on 26 Sep 2008 14:09 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-44D54D.09515426092008(a)shawnews.vc.shawcable.net... > In article <6k4i0eF640asU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> It was easy to lookup, you should try it some time. > > Having actual understanding without having to look things up: you should > try that. > > That you couldn't simply articulate your claim without resorting to a > cut and paste job says much about your actual understanding. Translation: "I deal in opinion not facts."
From: Alan Baker on 26 Sep 2008 14:48
In article <G7OdnZmCGaFMhUDVnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d(a)comcast.com>, "Michael Anselmo" <manselmo41(a)comcast.net> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-308940.08543326092008(a)shawnews.vc.shawcable.net... > > In article <6k448bF61j3hU2(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > >> news:alangbaker-87BD80.19212725092008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]... > >> > In article > >> > <ec41e2b7-02f3-4d08-987a-086e10c38b4a(a)a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > >> > The_Professor <dbid(a)att.net> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Sep 25, 5:39 pm, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:45:14 -0500, the Moderator wrote: > >> >> > > "William A. T. Clark" <cl...(a)nospammatsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote > >> >> > > in > >> >> > > message > >> >> > >news:clark-F7AC7E.07504625092008(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > >> >> > >> In article <nnDCk.1227$Jw....(a)nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, "Stapler" > >> >> > >> <stap...(a)tmp.com> wrote: > >> >> > >>> William Clark wrote: > >> >> > >>> > In article <48DADA61.9C862...(a)att.net>, The Professor > >> >> > >>> > <D...(a)att.net> > >> >> > >>> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> >> So Dem VP Joe Biden is on national TV talking about President > >> >> > >>> >> Roosevelt's TV address during the 1929 stock crash. What's he > >> >> > >>> >> gonna > >> >> > >>> >> do next, tell a guy in a wheelchair to stand up? Or has he > >> >> > >>> >> done > >> >> > >>> >> that already too? > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> >> What if Sarah Palin had done either of these things? > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> > There's no possibility of that - Sarah Palin doesn't even know > >> >> > >>> > who > >> >> > >>> > Roosevelt was. > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> Fuckhead. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> Another stellar contribution to informed debate. > >> >> > > >> >> > > Informed debate? You claim Palin does not know who Roosevelt was? > >> >> > > >> >> > Well, does she? She doesn't even know what the Bush Doctrine is, and > >> >> > that's a hell of a lot more current.- Hide quoted text - > >> >> > > >> >> > - Show quoted text - > >> >> > >> >> There is no Bush Doctrine. There is only Charleski asking Bush > >> >> questions. > >> > > >> > There is indeed a Bush doctrine. > >> > > >> > It details a philosophy that says the U.S. is allowed to unilaterally > >> > and pre-emptively attack sovereign nations when it feels like it > >> > (essentially). > >> > >> That's one version. > > > > By all means, describe another... > > > > -- > > Alan Baker > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > > > Great thread. > > Joe Biden says something very stupid. > > Someone points it out. > > The bashing of Palin starts. > > The bashing of Bush starts. > > Typical liberals. Biden and 0bama can do no wrong. Even if they say in on TV > with witnesses. I never said anything of the kind. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |