From: Chris Bellomy on
dgold1958 wrote, On 2/9/10 7:50 PM:
> As is customary here in RSG, I am posting about the round of golf that I
> played with Horvath yesterday. For only the second time, I have played
> golf with a fellow RSG'er. What made this one special was our opposite
> political stance.
> I am glad to say that politics never came up as a discussion. Horvath
> is a very nice guy and we had a very pleasant day on the golf course. The
> weather was absolutely perfect and the twosome that joined us was very
> pleasant, as well.
> The golf, as is probably usually the case, could have been better.
> Well, I could have putted MUCH better. What really counts, when it comes
> down to it, is enjoying this great game. I am glad that both of my
> experiences on the golf course with fellow RSG'ers has been very pleasant,
> and I am looking forward to the next time.

Yeah, but which Steve Horvath? I believe there are two...
From: Kurgan Gringioni on

"dgold1958" <dgold1958(a)yahoo.de> wrote in message
news:gvf947xhuk.ln2(a)recgroups.com...
> As is customary here in RSG, I am posting about the round of golf that I
> played with Horvath yesterday. For only the second time, I have played
> golf with a fellow RSG'er. What made this one special was our opposite
> political stance.

<snip>


Having the opposite stance in politics is only a problem if at least one of
the people is completely closed minded.

From: John van der Pflum on
I fixed your post. :-)

On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:22:04 -0800, "Kurgan Gringioni"
<kgringioni(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Having the opposite stance in politics is only a problem if at least one of
>the people is completely closed minded like 95% of people who only really
>want to argue and convince you that you are wrong, rather than have a
>true reasonable exchange of ideas. Because "they've thought about it"
>and if you haven't come to the same conclusion then you are an idiot.
--
jvdp
Hey Annika, you'll never hold these:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rockpyle/3940732311/

http://www.rsgcincinnati.com
From: Steve Horvath on
On Feb 10, 3:33 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog(a)sirhc> wrote:
> dgold1958 wrote, On 2/9/10 7:50 PM:
>
> > As is customary here in RSG, I am posting about the round of golf that I
> > played with Horvath yesterday.  For only the second time, I have played
> > golf with a fellow RSG'er.  What made this one special was our opposite
> > political stance.
> >   I am glad to say that politics never came up as a discussion.  Horvath
> > is a very nice guy and we had a very pleasant day on the golf course.  The
> > weather was absolutely perfect and the twosome that joined us was very
> > pleasant, as well.  
> >   The golf, as is probably usually the case, could have been better.
> > Well, I could have putted MUCH better. What really counts, when it comes
> > down to it, is enjoying this great game.  I am glad that both of my
> > experiences on the golf course with fellow RSG'ers has been very pleasant,
> > and I am looking forward to the next time.
>
> Yeah, but which Steve Horvath? I believe there are two...

Not I... didn't know the other guy's name was Steve, but other than
getting sucked in on a few pissing matches, I haven't spent much time
here in a few years.

From: Kurgan Gringioni on

"John van der Pflum" <nowhammymyspammy(a)bite.org> wrote in message
news:1hg6n5hcmli7nu292v0c37huhropqgpb3c(a)4ax.com...
>I fixed your post. :-)
>
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:22:04 -0800, "Kurgan Gringioni"
> <kgringioni(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Having the opposite stance in politics is only a problem if at least one
>>of
>>the people is completely closed minded like 95% of people who only really
>>want to argue and convince you that you are wrong, rather than have a
>>true reasonable exchange of ideas. Because "they've thought about it"
>>and if you haven't come to the same conclusion then you are an idiot.



Thanks for the clarification.