Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
in [Golf]
|
From: Jack Hollis on 3 Sep 2009 15:51 On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:28:49 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >The Death Panel thing is a good one to work on though, because anyone >who says they aren't going to be part of the system is lying. Palin's remark was so on target that the "end of life counseling" provision was removed from the legislation. That's a pretty good indication that she struck a nerve.
From: Dinosaur_Sr on 3 Sep 2009 17:07 On Sep 3, 2:51 pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:28:49 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > > <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote: > >The Death Panel thing is a good one to work on though, because anyone > >who says they aren't going to be part of the system is lying. > > Palin's remark was so on target that the "end of life counseling" > provision was removed from the legislation. That's a pretty good > indication that she struck a nerve. She makes one comment on twitter, and it's all over the media for months. That's her power. Dumb asses too afraid to face what she says head on ask you to dismiss her because she is stupid...with no evidence that she is stupid...no 57 states from her, or 4 letter words with 3 letters...and imagine the furor if she had made such a gaffe! Fact is the comment hits the core of the "reform". they want to cut costs, but not on the govt bureaucracy side, they want to cut costs on the service to the public side. Less facility, more users. Preventative care = health care for the healthy. Now me, I want health care when I am sick...but that's unAmerican I suppose.
From: Lloyd Parsons on 3 Sep 2009 17:20 In article <ie70a5pvpas9jeliqc5k3frbqpitoob991(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:28:49 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > > >The Death Panel thing is a good one to work on though, because anyone > >who says they aren't going to be part of the system is lying. > > Palin's remark was so on target that the "end of life counseling" > provision was removed from the legislation. That's a pretty good > indication that she struck a nerve. And that is because she did what she always does, sensationalize something that wasn't a bad thing at all. You get that a lot from the truly stupid people of this world.
From: Carbon on 3 Sep 2009 18:31 On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:42:12 -0700, gray asphalt wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4a9ef43c$0$5657$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:42:02 +0000, assimilate wrote: >>> On 1-Sep-2009, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>>> No. Her career is mostly smoke and mirrors. She is largely >>>> incapable of rational thought. >>> >>> this is just silly. you've no doubt read all the fashionable >>> criticism and you think you know what she's capable of. A little >>> knowledge is a dangerous thing. >> >> Bullshit. If you have any evidence of competence by all means share. > > She stood up to the big oil interests re: Alaska. Imo, she has some > character but doesn't have an education. She did some grandstanding and then she quit. Rinse, repeat.
From: Howard Brazee on 3 Sep 2009 19:48
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:51:36 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >>The Death Panel thing is a good one to work on though, because anyone >>who says they aren't going to be part of the system is lying. > >Palin's remark was so on target that the "end of life counseling" >provision was removed from the legislation. That's a pretty good >indication that she struck a nerve. It was a provision that didn't do anything. It was so much of a nothing that it wasn't worth fighting the FUD lie about it. But getting rid of it didn't change anything - lies don't go away when the thing they are lying about goes away. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |