Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 6 Sep 2009 16:10 On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:34:51 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > >>Obama, FWIW, needs to come clean on these issues, and either deny >>Holdren and Emanuel outright, or justify the value of their approaches >>as potential policy. > > It's not an accident that Obama is surrounded by extreme left-wing > radicals. I have no doubt that Obama was, and is, more inspired by > Karl Marx than Thomas Jefferson. You know, there are thousands of Usenet groups...
From: William Clark on 6 Sep 2009 16:23 In article <ki38a5p0ombr0tjfg7p6am76ch5v4cnasm(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:49:41 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr > <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: > > >Obama, FWIW, needs to > >come clean on these issues, and either deny Holdren and Emanuel > >outright, or justify the value of their approaches as potential > >policy. > > It's not an accident that Obama is surrounded by extreme left-wing > radicals. I have no doubt that Obama was, and is, more inspired by > Karl Marx than Thomas Jefferson. Christ on a bike - it was so nice when he was too ashamed to show his face here for eight months.
From: Jack Hollis on 6 Sep 2009 16:40 On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 19:51:04 GMT, assimilate(a)borg.org wrote: >On 6-Sep-2009, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> > I assume that this decision came after a long trial with many expert >> > witnesses followed by a period of deliberation. Now if the greatest >> > legal minds in Canada say that the Canadian health care system results >> > in people unnecessarily dying, then who am I, or you for that matter, >> > to disagree. >> >> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? > >And you accuse others of deflection? > >-- >bill-o When they start doing that, you know you got them. Carbon is starting to act like an Internet stalker if he follows my posts in another group. Besides, I have no idea what he's talking about. I occasionally post in the soccer folder, so what.
From: Jack Hollis on 6 Sep 2009 16:52 On 06 Sep 2009 20:08:35 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:51:04 +0000, assimilate wrote: >> On 6-Sep-2009, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >>>> I assume that this decision came after a long trial with many expert >>>> witnesses followed by a period of deliberation. Now if the greatest >>>> legal minds in Canada say that the Canadian health care system >>>> results in people unnecessarily dying, then who am I, or you for >>>> that matter, to disagree. >>> >>> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? >> >> And you accuse others of deflection? > >Jack visited Canada in the late 60's or early 70's, and I guess because >of that he imagines himself to be an expert on all things Canadian. As >someone who has actually lived there for 35 years, I beg to differ. Why >should I waste time on his endless bullshit? Because you agree with him? Fact is that you don't have anything relevant to say about people dying on waiting lists in Canada or the fact that millions of Canadians have to buy private insurance, or pay out of pocket, to get life saving drugs that the government program wont pay for. You'd rather talk about my posts in another group. And, I've been to Canada many time since my first visits to Quebec Provence in the 60s and 70s when I stood with my French Canadian brothers against their oppression by the English. Vive le Quebec Libre!
From: Bobby Knight on 6 Sep 2009 17:33
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:53:27 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote: >On Sep 5, 7:08�pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:13:47 -0700, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> >> wrote: >> >> >So that's KnitWit's excuse.....that it was written out of context, 32 years >> >ago. >> >> The out of context argument is complete rubbish. �What they say is >> obvious. � >> >> The only way to describe the person who wrote these things is as an >> Eco-Fascist. �Someone who is willing to suspend democracy, the >> Constitution and human rights to protect the environment. > >Even if you take the "what if" view here, it shows how the policy is >bad. You give govt these powers and they then can do these things. Of >course Holdren is "advising" what can be done to control population, >and he is a Sr. WH adviser. I suppose Knit Wit thinks Holdren is >giving someone else's advice in his book! Obvious that you didn't take time to research this either. BK |