Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
in [Golf]
|
From: Bobby Knight on 7 Sep 2009 08:51 On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:50:59 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.com> wrote: > >"Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >news:4aa1976a$0$23938$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >> She's done for in my opinion. Yesterday's trash. But she is still much >> admired by the retarded wing of your party. Why is that, do you think? >> >> I'm serious. Why do you think she has so many millions of rabid fans? > >They want to nail her? > Now THAT'S a thought that was certainly rampant. :-) BK
From: William Clark on 7 Sep 2009 09:17 In article <7gj3dgF2pmajpU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4aa4523f$0$4954$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:24:04 -0700, dene wrote: > > > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > > news:4aa44eac$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > >> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:53:33 -0700, dene wrote: > > >> > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > >> > news:4aa3e396$0$4943$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > >> >> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:32:46 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > > >> >> > On 06 Sep 2009 14:43:39 GMT, Carbon > > >> >> > <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > >> >> >>On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:18:28 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > > >> >> >>> On 06 Sep 2009 02:38:47 GMT, Carbon > > >> >> >>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>>> In Canada if you're sick and you need expensive care, you get > > >> >> >>>> it, period. > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> Canadians get it all right, but not the way they think. > > >> >> >>> Canada's health care rationing kills. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >>Spare me the bullshit. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > From the Canadian Supreme Court decision July, 2005. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > "Delays in the public system are widespread and have serious, > > >> >> > sometimes grave, consequences," wrote Chief Justice Beverley > > >> >> > McLachlin and Justice John Major. "Inevitably where patients > > >> >> > have life-threatening conditions, some will die because of undue > > >> >> > delay in awaiting surgery." > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I assume that this decision came after a long trial with many > > >> >> > expert witnesses followed by a period of deliberation. Now if > > >> >> > the greatest legal minds in Canada say that the Canadian health > > >> >> > care system results in people unnecessarily dying, then who am > > >> >> > I, or you for that matter, to disagree. > > >> >> > > >> >> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? > > >> > > > >> > Nice diversion, Carbs, but why don't you address Jack's cite. > > >> > > >> I have addressed Jack's bullshit ad nauseum in the past. Done with > > >> that. > > > > > > Then don't criticize what he says. > > > > Why the hell not? He's already worn this newsgroup out. There are plenty > > more. > > I don't care about other newsgroups. If you want to refute Hollis's views > and cites, counter them with your own cites, or perhaps ignore him > completely. Trying to toss him from this NG is low class. You are better > than that. > > -Greg Why don't you ask him about his experience as a "student" at Columbia? See if that is consistent with his other BS.
From: BAR on 7 Sep 2009 09:58 William Clark wrote: > In article <7gj3dgF2pmajpU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4aa4523f$0$4954$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:24:04 -0700, dene wrote: >>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>> news:4aa44eac$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:53:33 -0700, dene wrote: >>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:4aa3e396$0$4943$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:32:46 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: >>>>>>>> On 06 Sep 2009 14:43:39 GMT, Carbon >>>>>>>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:18:28 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 06 Sep 2009 02:38:47 GMT, Carbon >>>>>>>>>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In Canada if you're sick and you need expensive care, you get >>>>>>>>>>> it, period. >>>>>>>>>> Canadians get it all right, but not the way they think. >>>>>>>>>> Canada's health care rationing kills. >>>>>>>>> Spare me the bullshit. >>>>>>>> From the Canadian Supreme Court decision July, 2005. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Delays in the public system are widespread and have serious, >>>>>>>> sometimes grave, consequences," wrote Chief Justice Beverley >>>>>>>> McLachlin and Justice John Major. "Inevitably where patients >>>>>>>> have life-threatening conditions, some will die because of undue >>>>>>>> delay in awaiting surgery." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I assume that this decision came after a long trial with many >>>>>>>> expert witnesses followed by a period of deliberation. Now if >>>>>>>> the greatest legal minds in Canada say that the Canadian health >>>>>>>> care system results in people unnecessarily dying, then who am >>>>>>>> I, or you for that matter, to disagree. >>>>>>> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? >>>>>> Nice diversion, Carbs, but why don't you address Jack's cite. >>>>> I have addressed Jack's bullshit ad nauseum in the past. Done with >>>>> that. >>>> Then don't criticize what he says. >>> Why the hell not? He's already worn this newsgroup out. There are plenty >>> more. >> I don't care about other newsgroups. If you want to refute Hollis's views >> and cites, counter them with your own cites, or perhaps ignore him >> completely. Trying to toss him from this NG is low class. You are better >> than that. >> >> -Greg > > Why don't you ask him about his experience as a "student" at Columbia? > See if that is consistent with his other BS. Are you asking about Obama's undergraduate transcripts? We would all like to see them. I'm sure Obama was a charity case when he was "accepted" at Harvard Law and Obama's undergraduate transcript from Columbia will provide the proof.
From: Carbon on 7 Sep 2009 10:34 On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:58:27 -0400, BAR wrote: > William Clark wrote: >> In article <7gj3dgF2pmajpU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" >> <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:4aa4523f$0$4954$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:24:04 -0700, dene wrote: >>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:4aa44eac$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:53:33 -0700, dene wrote: >>>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:4aa3e396$0$4943$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nice diversion, Carbs, but why don't you address Jack's cite. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have addressed Jack's bullshit ad nauseum in the past. Done >>>>>> with that. >>>>> >>>>> Then don't criticize what he says. >>>> >>>> Why the hell not? He's already worn this newsgroup out. There are >>>> plenty more. >>> >>> I don't care about other newsgroups. If you want to refute Hollis's >>> views and cites, counter them with your own cites, or perhaps ignore >>> him completely. Trying to toss him from this NG is low class. You >>> are better than that. >> >> Why don't you ask him about his experience as a "student" at >> Columbia? See if that is consistent with his other BS. > > Are you asking about Obama's undergraduate transcripts? We would all > like to see them. I'm sure Obama was a charity case when he was > "accepted" at Harvard Law and Obama's undergraduate transcript from > Columbia will provide the proof. Of course you're sure. But you have no evidence. Which makes you an affirmative action conspiracy theorist idiot. Congratulations.
From: Frank Ketchum on 7 Sep 2009 11:06
"dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote in message news:7gjftuF2gq49aU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > Well....she beats the Dems Dames. Pelosi and Janet Reno. > Janet Reno, Madeleine Albright, and Hillary Clinton. mmmmmmm, tasty. |