Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 8 Sep 2009 06:39 William Clark wrote: > In article <1LCdnfuIP_N85TjXnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, > BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > >> William Clark wrote: >>> In article <2t-dnd7SI-IajDjXnZ2dnUVZ_hdi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, >>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>> >>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>> In article <7gj3dgF2pmajpU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >>>>> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:4aa4523f$0$4954$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:24:04 -0700, dene wrote: >>>>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:4aa44eac$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:53:33 -0700, dene wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:4aa3e396$0$4943$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:32:46 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 06 Sep 2009 14:43:39 GMT, Carbon >>>>>>>>>>>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:18:28 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06 Sep 2009 02:38:47 GMT, Carbon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Canada if you're sick and you need expensive care, you get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, period. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Canadians get it all right, but not the way they think. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Canada's health care rationing kills. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Spare me the bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>> From the Canadian Supreme Court decision July, 2005. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Delays in the public system are widespread and have serious, >>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes grave, consequences," wrote Chief Justice Beverley >>>>>>>>>>>> McLachlin and Justice John Major. "Inevitably where patients >>>>>>>>>>>> have life-threatening conditions, some will die because of undue >>>>>>>>>>>> delay in awaiting surgery." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I assume that this decision came after a long trial with many >>>>>>>>>>>> expert witnesses followed by a period of deliberation. Now if >>>>>>>>>>>> the greatest legal minds in Canada say that the Canadian health >>>>>>>>>>>> care system results in people unnecessarily dying, then who am >>>>>>>>>>>> I, or you for that matter, to disagree. >>>>>>>>>>> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? >>>>>>>>>> Nice diversion, Carbs, but why don't you address Jack's cite. >>>>>>>>> I have addressed Jack's bullshit ad nauseum in the past. Done with >>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>> Then don't criticize what he says. >>>>>>> Why the hell not? He's already worn this newsgroup out. There are >>>>>>> plenty >>>>>>> more. >>>>>> I don't care about other newsgroups. If you want to refute Hollis's >>>>>> views >>>>>> and cites, counter them with your own cites, or perhaps ignore him >>>>>> completely. Trying to toss him from this NG is low class. You are >>>>>> better >>>>>> than that. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Greg >>>>> Why don't you ask him about his experience as a "student" at Columbia? >>>>> See if that is consistent with his other BS. >>>> Are you asking about Obama's undergraduate transcripts? We would all >>>> like to see them. I'm sure Obama was a charity case when he was >>>> "accepted" at Harvard Law and Obama's undergraduate transcript from >>>> Columbia will provide the proof. >>> Of course you are sure. Your vast experience of the US university system >>> tells you that, doesn't it? Or do you just have a huge chip on your >>> shoulder because Obama go to go to Columbia (unlike Hollis) and Harvard, >>> and you never got to college? >> "becasue Obama go to go to Columbia" what the hell does this mean? >> Doesn't it suck when the apple bites back. > > It means because Obama got to go to Columbia, and you didn't. Or > anywhere else. That must be a special form of the Queen's English. >> You still didn't address the issue of Obama's undergraduate performance >> at Columbia. All evidence points to Obama getting into Harvard due to >> who he knew and not what he knew. > > "All evidence"? Then I am sure you can produce a cite to "all evidence", > can't you? I look forward to seeing this "evidence", which seems to me > to amount to nothing more than the fact that Obama is black, and > therefore in your mind cannot possibly have the intellectual make up to > get into an Ivy League school. Or is this the second coming of the > birthers? Obama is 1/2 black and 1/2 white. >> Wrong again Billy I attended college. I never received a degree but, I >> attended college. > > "Attended" but got no degree? That puts you on an even lower rung than > Palin. She at least got something after six community colleges and small > universities, albeit a degree in communications. Wow. Me and Bill Gates.
From: BAR on 8 Sep 2009 07:01 William Clark wrote: > In article <diraa5htt62is7r5u8ot9d8lb4fouc6b1r(a)4ax.com>, > Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:58:27 -0400, BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >> >>> Are you asking about Obama's undergraduate transcripts? We would all >>> like to see them. I'm sure Obama was a charity case when he was >>> "accepted" at Harvard Law and Obama's undergraduate transcript from >>> Columbia will provide the proof. >> His SAT and LSAT scores would be very interesting. You can get a >> pretty good idea of IQ from both of those scores. I wonder why he >> hasn't released them. > > Because he doesn't need to and they are not relevant to anything. What > are your SAT and ACT scores? You will have to provide documentary > evidence for them, of course, otherwise they are not to be believed. > > God, I thought you idiots had enough embarrassment with your birther > fiasco. Nope, it drives you freaking nuts and it is an activity to be enjoyed.
From: BAR on 8 Sep 2009 07:01 William Clark wrote: > In article <2N2dnYoWg5v4FDjXnZ2dnUVZ_hBi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, > BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > >> Jack Hollis wrote: >>> On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:58:27 -0400, BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>> >>>> Are you asking about Obama's undergraduate transcripts? We would all >>>> like to see them. I'm sure Obama was a charity case when he was >>>> "accepted" at Harvard Law and Obama's undergraduate transcript from >>>> Columbia will provide the proof. >>> His SAT and LSAT scores would be very interesting. You can get a >>> pretty good idea of IQ from both of those scores. I wonder why he >>> hasn't released them. >> We know why he hasn't released them. It would destroy the lefts >> perception of Obama. Remember when they found out that Bush had better >> grades than Kerry? They sure as hell aren't going to let that happen again. > > Shouldn't he release his dental records, too, in case he has a filling > you morons didn't know about? The "lefts" perception is of a bunch of > sorry, intellectually bereft, losers who can find nothing to drag the > President down with but for these petty, ludicrous, phony "credential" > wars. Do you realize what a bunch of whiners you all look like? Dan Rather says hello!
From: Carbon on 8 Sep 2009 07:42 On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:01:06 -0400, BAR wrote: > William Clark wrote: > >> God, I thought you idiots had enough embarrassment with your birther >> fiasco. > > Nope, it drives you freaking nuts and it is an activity to be enjoyed. Nope, it drives centrists freaking nuts and will cost you the 2012 election.
From: The moderator on 8 Sep 2009 08:06
"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-0B648F.22120107092009(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > > No, your ability to lie about its contents should be everyone's concern. Stop projecting. |