Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 8 Sep 2009 08:54 In article <v-ydnTvGfJzrpDvXnZ2dnUVZ_odi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > William Clark wrote: > > In article <diraa5htt62is7r5u8ot9d8lb4fouc6b1r(a)4ax.com>, > > Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:58:27 -0400, BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > >> > >>> Are you asking about Obama's undergraduate transcripts? We would all > >>> like to see them. I'm sure Obama was a charity case when he was > >>> "accepted" at Harvard Law and Obama's undergraduate transcript from > >>> Columbia will provide the proof. > >> His SAT and LSAT scores would be very interesting. You can get a > >> pretty good idea of IQ from both of those scores. I wonder why he > >> hasn't released them. > > > > Because he doesn't need to and they are not relevant to anything. What > > are your SAT and ACT scores? You will have to provide documentary > > evidence for them, of course, otherwise they are not to be believed. > > > > God, I thought you idiots had enough embarrassment with your birther > > fiasco. > > Nope, it drives you freaking nuts and it is an activity to be enjoyed. Which would be the case if anyone with an IQ took you loons seriously.
From: William Clark on 8 Sep 2009 09:12 In article <avWdnRXtA44cqTvXnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > William Clark wrote: > > In article <1LCdnfuIP_N85TjXnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, > > BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > > > >> William Clark wrote: > >>> In article <2t-dnd7SI-IajDjXnZ2dnUVZ_hdi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, > >>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> William Clark wrote: > >>>>> In article <7gj3dgF2pmajpU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > >>>>> "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >>>>>> news:4aa4523f$0$4954$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 17:24:04 -0700, dene wrote: > >>>>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>> news:4aa44eac$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:53:33 -0700, dene wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>> news:4aa3e396$0$4943$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:32:46 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 06 Sep 2009 14:43:39 GMT, Carbon > >>>>>>>>>>>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:18:28 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06 Sep 2009 02:38:47 GMT, Carbon > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Canada if you're sick and you need expensive care, you get > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, period. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Canadians get it all right, but not the way they think. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Canada's health care rationing kills. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Spare me the bullshit. > >>>>>>>>>>>> From the Canadian Supreme Court decision July, 2005. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Delays in the public system are widespread and have serious, > >>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes grave, consequences," wrote Chief Justice Beverley > >>>>>>>>>>>> McLachlin and Justice John Major. "Inevitably where patients > >>>>>>>>>>>> have life-threatening conditions, some will die because of undue > >>>>>>>>>>>> delay in awaiting surgery." > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I assume that this decision came after a long trial with many > >>>>>>>>>>>> expert witnesses followed by a period of deliberation. Now if > >>>>>>>>>>>> the greatest legal minds in Canada say that the Canadian health > >>>>>>>>>>>> care system results in people unnecessarily dying, then who am > >>>>>>>>>>>> I, or you for that matter, to disagree. > >>>>>>>>>>> I guess things didn't work out on rec.sport.soccer, huh? > >>>>>>>>>> Nice diversion, Carbs, but why don't you address Jack's cite. > >>>>>>>>> I have addressed Jack's bullshit ad nauseum in the past. Done with > >>>>>>>>> that. > >>>>>>>> Then don't criticize what he says. > >>>>>>> Why the hell not? He's already worn this newsgroup out. There are > >>>>>>> plenty > >>>>>>> more. > >>>>>> I don't care about other newsgroups. If you want to refute Hollis's > >>>>>> views > >>>>>> and cites, counter them with your own cites, or perhaps ignore him > >>>>>> completely. Trying to toss him from this NG is low class. You are > >>>>>> better > >>>>>> than that. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Greg > >>>>> Why don't you ask him about his experience as a "student" at Columbia? > >>>>> See if that is consistent with his other BS. > >>>> Are you asking about Obama's undergraduate transcripts? We would all > >>>> like to see them. I'm sure Obama was a charity case when he was > >>>> "accepted" at Harvard Law and Obama's undergraduate transcript from > >>>> Columbia will provide the proof. > >>> Of course you are sure. Your vast experience of the US university system > >>> tells you that, doesn't it? Or do you just have a huge chip on your > >>> shoulder because Obama go to go to Columbia (unlike Hollis) and Harvard, > >>> and you never got to college? > >> "becasue Obama go to go to Columbia" what the hell does this mean? > >> Doesn't it suck when the apple bites back. > > > > It means because Obama got to go to Columbia, and you didn't. Or > > anywhere else. > > That must be a special form of the Queen's English. Well, it is no surprise that it is beyond your comprehension skills. > > >> You still didn't address the issue of Obama's undergraduate performance > >> at Columbia. All evidence points to Obama getting into Harvard due to > >> who he knew and not what he knew. > > > > "All evidence"? Then I am sure you can produce a cite to "all evidence", > > can't you? I look forward to seeing this "evidence", which seems to me > > to amount to nothing more than the fact that Obama is black, and > > therefore in your mind cannot possibly have the intellectual make up to > > get into an Ivy League school. Or is this the second coming of the > > birthers? > > Obama is 1/2 black and 1/2 white. Obama is African-American. Get used to it. > > >> Wrong again Billy I attended college. I never received a degree but, I > >> attended college. > > > > "Attended" but got no degree? That puts you on an even lower rung than > > Palin. She at least got something after six community colleges and small > > universities, albeit a degree in communications. Wow. > > Me and Bill Gates. Really.
From: dene on 8 Sep 2009 10:29 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4aa5f973$0$23958$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:00:24 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote: > > On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:01:49 -0600, Howard Brazee <howard(a)brazee.net> > > wrote: > >>On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:03:59 -0400, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >>>This is incorrect. Millions in the US don't have health insurance. > >>>Everyone in the US has access to health care. > >> > >>And we pay through the nose when the uninsured get treated. But some > >>people would rather pay more, as long as they can avert their eyes > >>from the fact that the wrong people are getting help. > > > > No doubt that the cost of treating the uninsured is passed on to the > > rest of us one way or the other. > > Which (obviously) is why it's cheaper to just give everyone health > insurance and be done with it. "Give?" -Greg
From: Bobby Knight on 8 Sep 2009 10:51 On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:39:52 -0400, BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >William Clark wrote: >>> Wrong again Billy I attended college. I never received a degree but, I >>> attended college. > >Me and Bill Gates. The comparison ends there Bert, with a dull thud. BK
From: Jack Hollis on 8 Sep 2009 11:02
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:17:43 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >> No doubt that the cost of treating the uninsured is passed on to the >> rest of us one way or the other. > >"Us" being the responsible insured. > >-Greg Yes, and the employers who pay all, or most, of the insurance costs. |