Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
in [Golf]
|
From: Carbon on 4 Sep 2009 18:42 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:23:27 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote: > "Bobby Knight" <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:5gb2a55chg0268g5ui3p9fk2r711t9vvr8(a)4ax.com... > >> Boy Frank. You're really awake today. Out of the public's eye? >> Are you living in a vacuum? She's such a joke that anything she's >> said in the last year makes news. > > She is perceived by the left wing as so dangerous that anything she > says makes news. The left went into hyperdrive to destroy her when > she was added to McCain's ticket. I personally don't understand what > they see in her that is so threatening. No, she was an eye-roll, a joke. She still is.
From: Carbon on 4 Sep 2009 19:17 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:33:00 -0500, The moderator wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4aa0d9ee$0$23966$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:41:17 -0700, dene wrote: >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:4aa043d7$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:42:12 -0700, gray asphalt wrote: >>>> > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>> > news:4a9ef43c$0$5657$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> >> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:42:02 +0000, assimilate wrote: >>>> >>> On 1-Sep-2009, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> No. Her career is mostly smoke and mirrors. She is largely >>>> >>>> incapable of rational thought. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> this is just silly. you've no doubt read all the fashionable >>>> >>> criticism and you think you know what she's capable of. A >>>> >>> little knowledge is a dangerous thing. >>>> >> >>>> >> Bullshit. If you have any evidence of competence by all means >>>> >> share. >>>> > >>>> > She stood up to the big oil interests re: Alaska. Imo, she has >>>> > some character but doesn't have an education. >>>> >>>> She did some grandstanding and then she quit. Rinse, repeat. >>> >>> Ya know....you libs should clean up your own house first. The >>> platitudes Ted Kennedy received were ridiculous. He should have >>> been jailed for vehicular manslaughter, not to mention hit and run. >>> And now, Charles Rangel..... Apparently he forgot he had a few >>> hundred thousand dollars in a couple of accounts. >>> >>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/02/ >> AR2009090203082.html >>> >>> It's understandable....I've been known to leave some $$ in the >>> laundry bin. >> >> I do not care about Kennedy or Rangel. The discussion was whether >> Palin is capable of holding high public office, and she clearly is >> not. > > Palin is not capable, but killers and tax cheats are qualified? As a differently abled person, you are obviously unaware that the antics of Kennedy and Rangel have no bearing on Palin's suitability for high public office. Oh well, sucks to be you.
From: Carbon on 4 Sep 2009 19:23 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:58:24 -0700, dene wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4aa0d9ee$0$23966$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:41:17 -0700, dene wrote: >> > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> > news:4aa043d7$0$4986$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:42:12 -0700, gray asphalt wrote: >> >> > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> >> > news:4a9ef43c$0$5657$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >> >> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:42:02 +0000, assimilate wrote: >> >> >>> On 1-Sep-2009, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> No. Her career is mostly smoke and mirrors. She is largely >> >> >>>> incapable of rational thought. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> this is just silly. you've no doubt read all the fashionable >> >> >>> criticism and you think you know what she's capable of. A >> >> >>> little knowledge is a dangerous thing. >> >> >> >> >> >> Bullshit. If you have any evidence of competence by all means >> >> >> share. >> >> > >> >> > She stood up to the big oil interests re: Alaska. Imo, she has >> >> > some character but doesn't have an education. >> >> >> >> She did some grandstanding and then she quit. Rinse, repeat. >> > >> > Ya know....you libs should clean up your own house first. The >> > platitudes Ted Kennedy received were ridiculous. He should have >> > been jailed for vehicular manslaughter, not to mention hit and run. >> > And now, Charles Rangel..... Apparently he forgot he had a few >> > hundred thousand dollars in a couple of accounts. >> > >> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/02/ >> AR2009090203082.html >> > >> > It's understandable....I've been known to leave some $$ in the >> > laundry bin. >> >> I do not care about Kennedy or Rangel. The discussion was whether >> Palin is capable of holding high public office, and she clearly is >> not. > > If either were Republican, you'd care. I really wouldn't. You've surely noticed that Kennedy is dead. Rangel appears to be a corrupt old coot like so many in Washington, but he is on his way out. Whereas Palin is today's news. She even has the potential to split the Republican party going into 2012. Go Sarah.
From: Carbon on 4 Sep 2009 19:29 On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:01:12 +0000, Bobby Knight wrote: > On 04 Sep 2009 22:40:42 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> > wrote: >>On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:47:44 -0400, Frank Ketchum wrote: >> >>> And yet here we are. It is nearly a year later, Democrats hold the >>> white house and both houses of congress. We are neck deep into the >>> "change" we were promised. Palin has resigned from her governorship >>> and is basically out of the public eye. >>> >>> Yet you still ramble on and on and on and on about her. >> >>She's done for in my opinion. Yesterday's trash. But she is still much >>admired by the retarded wing of your party. Why is that, do you think? >> >>I'm serious. Why do you think she has so many millions of rabid fans? > > I'm not sure that there are so many millions. The last poll I saw > showed: > > Favorable 37% Unfavorable43% Unsure/NeverHeard of 20% > > IMO she appeals to those people who think that because doesn't fit the > image of most politicians it's a good thing. They call her an > "ordinary" person. > > Well, she IS ordinary, and we damned sure don't need that in our > leaders. It also seems that several here use her name to troll. Hard > to believe them when they extol her as someone to look up to. They > have to be smarter than that. Well Rob is clearly trolling. But there are a lot of retards out there, millions upon millions who are too stunned to see that she's a dingbat.
From: Jack Hollis on 4 Sep 2009 20:00
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:29:23 -0500, Lloyd Parsons <lloydparsons(a)mac.com> wrote: >> What would you call a mandatory consultation to advise patients of >> government approved end of life options? > >You need to go back and read the bill, there is NO mandatory requirement. It's a moot point now because this section has been removed. However, the "counseling" sessions are mandated every five years and the content of the sessions are also mandated. ��Advance Care Planning Consultation 6 ��(hhh)(1) Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), the term �advance care planning consultation� means a consultation between the individual and a practitioner described in paragraph (2) regarding advance care planning, if, subject to paragraph (3), the individual involved has not had such a consultation within the last 5 years. Such consultation shall include the following" Here's the pdf file. The section in question starts on page 425. http://docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf |