Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
in [Golf]
|
From: BAR on 16 Sep 2009 10:24 William Clark wrote: > In article <6_6dndsd6ou-gy3XnZ2dnUVZ_oRi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, > BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > >> William Clark wrote: >>> In article <GfWdnaKYdMNymDLXnZ2dnUVZ_uOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, >>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>> >>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>> In article <G9GdndNa2dCdSjPXnZ2dnUVZ_gJi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, >>>>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>>>> In article <4LGdnQusqJFTyzXXnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, >>>>>>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <l5uca5d39v9sqb069e2dkooaruvri6es2i(a)4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>> Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 08 Sep 2009 06:30:26 GMT, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> His SAT and LSAT scores would be very interesting. You can get a >>>>>>>>>>>> pretty good idea of IQ from both of those scores. I wonder why he >>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't released them. >>>>>>>>>>> For the same reason that he didn't release his birth certificate to >>>>>>>>>>> those birther loons: there is no upside to pandering to retards. >>>>>>>>>> Actually he did release his birth certificate. >>>>>>>>> It is in the public records. He didn't have to "release" anything. >>>>>>>> He did not release a copy of his original birth certificate that was >>>>>>>> issued at the time of his birth. There is a difference. >>>>>>> No there is not. Sorry, but at least I accept that this is all you have. >>>>>> Yes, there is a difference in the types of birth certificates that were >>>>>> provided in 1961 and the ones provided now. I have more familiarity with >>>>>> birth certificates issued in 1961 than you. >>>>> Right, well too bad you got this one wrong. The only available >>>>> certificate has been produced time and time again, but morons like you >>>>> just can't stand a black man being President. >>>> "The only available certificate has been produced." I can get one just >>>> like Obama's too or I can get a copy of the true original certificate of >>>> my birth. In fact I have certified copies of both. Funny thing is they >>>> don't look the same. One is printed on funny colored paper and the other >>>> is a negative image a record recored at the time of my birth. Hmmmm. >>> Oh, just give it up and grow up. >> You know I'm right and you can't argue this one can you Billy? >> >> Maybe I'll put up copies of circa 1961 records of live births and >> documents produced in the 1990's as certifications of live birth. > > No, I now you are DEAD wrong, and this is simply another cheap stunt to > try to undermine the President by any despicable means you can find. Do > you really think that the FBI and CIA never ran background checks before > he became a Senator? If you do, then you are truly dumber than a rock. When you are an elected member of the House or Senate your FBI background check doesn't deny you your seat in either chamber. And, it may not deny you information from various federal agencies either. Deference is given to the choice of the people in their elected representatives.
From: BAR on 16 Sep 2009 10:49 Bobby Knight wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:47:35 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> "Bobby Knight" <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> news:gnqva5p38cr0k97vfopdhc3l7p9bequrfo(a)4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:50:26 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> "Bobby Knight" <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>> news:n6mva5h6ii6ee0k4vm73sel0eq745h1uu3(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:57:59 GMT, Bobby Knight <bknight(a)conramp.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:45:12 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Bobby Knight" <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:6nuua5tllr6kh1n3r00hmfod6rqlg19gdj(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:16:58 -0400, BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bobby Knight wrote: >>>>>>>> Again, a birther is the bottom of the barrel of intelligence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BK >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> I think truthers already have that position. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>>> >>>>>> BK >>>>> I should've been clearer. Birthers, truthers, deathers and teabaggers >>>>> are equally mentally incompetent. >>>>> >>>>> BK >>>> People who use the word teabaggers to reference the tea party tax >>>> protesters >>>> are in the same group. >>>> >>> Wrong. Whether one believes that their cause is right or wrong, >>> that's what they are called. >>> >> By idiots. >> > > I neither have a problem with the group, or made up the name. The > name to me isn't a put down, and that's how I'll refer to them, which > doesn't put me in any group. > > You're being ridiculous. You are in the liars group.
From: BAR on 16 Sep 2009 10:53 Alan Baker wrote: > In article <HpidnVPmlfH9vy3XnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, > BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: > >> Alan Baker wrote: >>> In article <ap-dnWv6Co3l7jLXnZ2dnUVZ_j5i4p2d(a)giganews.com>, >>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>> >>>> Alan Baker wrote: >>>>> In article <GfWdnaKYdMNymDLXnZ2dnUVZ_uOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, >>>>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>>>> In article <G9GdndNa2dCdSjPXnZ2dnUVZ_gJi4p2d(a)giganews.com>, >>>>>>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <4LGdnQusqJFTyzXXnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>> BAR <Screw(a)You.Com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> William Clark wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <l5uca5d39v9sqb069e2dkooaruvri6es2i(a)4ax.com>, >>>>>>>>>>> Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 08 Sep 2009 06:30:26 GMT, Carbon >>>>>>>>>>>> <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> His SAT and LSAT scores would be very interesting. You can get a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty good idea of IQ from both of those scores. I wonder why >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't released them. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For the same reason that he didn't release his birth certificate >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> those birther loons: there is no upside to pandering to retards. >>>>>>>>>>>> Actually he did release his birth certificate. >>>>>>>>>>> It is in the public records. He didn't have to "release" anything. >>>>>>>>>> He did not release a copy of his original birth certificate that was >>>>>>>>>> issued at the time of his birth. There is a difference. >>>>>>>>> No there is not. Sorry, but at least I accept that this is all you >>>>>>>>> have. >>>>>>>> Yes, there is a difference in the types of birth certificates that >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> provided in 1961 and the ones provided now. I have more familiarity >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> birth certificates issued in 1961 than you. >>>>>>> Right, well too bad you got this one wrong. The only available >>>>>>> certificate has been produced time and time again, but morons like you >>>>>>> just can't stand a black man being President. >>>>>> "The only available certificate has been produced." I can get one just >>>>>> like Obama's too or I can get a copy of the true original certificate of >>>>>> my birth. In fact I have certified copies of both. Funny thing is they >>>>>> don't look the same. One is printed on funny colored paper and the other >>>>>> is a negative image a record recored at the time of my birth. Hmmmm. >>>>> Not if you're from Hawaii, you can't. >>>>> >>>>> The only certificate Hawaii issues is the one that has been produced. >>>>> >>>> Did time start with yesterday's sunrise? >>> No, but that has absolutely nothing to do with it. >>> >> The only certificate they issue now. The operative word is "now." > > Right. > > What of it? > > What other certificate is he supposed to have? Or do you imagine that if > he hasn't kept every scrap of paper he ever had (assuming he ever had > it) he's somehow done something wrong? I will take this as an admission that you know there exists another form of birth certificate. We will call this the original certificate of live birth recorded with the vital records department.
From: MNMikeW on 16 Sep 2009 11:01 "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message news:4ab0149b$0$5637$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:20:43 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:4aaf1d3f$0$4971$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:18:44 -0400, BAR wrote: >>> >>>> I don't think you want to go down the articulate path. Obama doesn't >>>> go anywhere without his Tele-Prompter. When Obama speaks >>>> extemporaneously he sounds like an idiot and makes GWB's verbal >>>> miscues appear like normal stutters. >>> >>> Where are you true believers getting this garbage from anyway? >> >> Ummm, errrrr, ahhhhh. > > I thought so. > > You normally see this when he is being asked policy type questions, and > he is clearly being careful with what he says. He is the President after > all, and it is generally a bad idea to give too much away or to mislead > people. The advantage is that he does emit high quality output, so you > don't often see types trying to explain away various gaffes, as they had > to do so often under Wubya. Funny, pretty much all Obama does is mislead people.
From: BAR on 16 Sep 2009 11:05
MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4ab0149b$0$5637$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:20:43 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:4aaf1d3f$0$4971$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:18:44 -0400, BAR wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't think you want to go down the articulate path. Obama doesn't >>>>> go anywhere without his Tele-Prompter. When Obama speaks >>>>> extemporaneously he sounds like an idiot and makes GWB's verbal >>>>> miscues appear like normal stutters. >>>> Where are you true believers getting this garbage from anyway? >>> Ummm, errrrr, ahhhhh. >> I thought so. >> >> You normally see this when he is being asked policy type questions, and >> he is clearly being careful with what he says. He is the President after >> all, and it is generally a bad idea to give too much away or to mislead >> people. The advantage is that he does emit high quality output, so you >> don't often see types trying to explain away various gaffes, as they had >> to do so often under Wubya. > > Funny, pretty much all Obama does is mislead people. If Obama is being asked about why the stimulus isn't working and how much fraud and abuse has been found in the programs he is an idiot? This isn't about policy, it is about execution and management. |