Here is your illegal alien for you..........
in [Golf]
|
From: bknight on 12 May 2010 14:42 On Wed, 12 May 2010 11:32:27 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: >In article <850ab7Fa7eU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > I said a high percentage. I didn't compare it to any other percentage. >> > Learn how to read, dope. >> > >> > Anything > 0% is too high. >> > >> > Ken >> > >> > Ken >> >> How high? >> >> =================== >> From what I've seen its around 30%. > >"From what I've seen"? What would that be? In 2007 Newsblaze reported that approximately 30 percent of the inmates in California prisons are illegal aliens, or "documented criminals,". So its less than 30%, since documented criminals aren't illegals. BK
From: MNMikeW on 12 May 2010 15:09 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:3uslu5ln8mtrj0kqumh17cub45fbqta6pk(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 May 2010 13:28:00 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:kcplu59brbsqndolnlc1f575s35j7ipio3(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 12 May 2010 12:27:36 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>>>news:3tklu5da1bh9qimof0o9a68sjmr1tjfkno(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:45:30 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"F. Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:hsd98s$5n4$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> One can find deviants in any demographic group. Painting the >>>>>>> character >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> an entire group based upon the actions of a few is politely called >>>>>>> stereotyping. Impolitely, it can be called some other things. >>>>> >>>>>>Kind of like what the media does to the Tea Party movement. >>>>>> >>>>> correct, but don't blame the media because the Tea Party doesn't keep >>>>> those few fools in check. >>>>> >>>>> BK >>>> >>>>And just how exactly are they supposed to do that. >>> >>> For starters take control of their meetings and demonstrations. >> >>The Tea Party movement is not controlled by a single entity. And ANYBODY >>can >>show up at ANY demonstration. > > And when they do they represent the group demonstrating. All > demonstrations are monitored by the backers of that demonstration and > usually try to handle those situations before they get out of hand. Pure baloney. >>> >>>>So the Hispanic community should be blamed for not keeping their fools >>>>in check? >>> >>> Of course. Why would you think differently? >>> >>> BK >> >>Ok, I'll hold my breath till this happens. > > It happens at demonstrations, and when they get out of hand those who > initiated the demonstration are held responsible. > > BK >> I certainly didn't see anyone holding anyone accountable for the rioting that went on during the 5th of May demonstrations.
From: MNMikeW on 12 May 2010 15:12 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:retlu5t47rg21jltiet7epnh1fqagp8b1m(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 May 2010 11:32:27 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> > wrote: > >>In article <850ab7Fa7eU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>> > I said a high percentage. I didn't compare it to any other percentage. >>> > Learn how to read, dope. >>> > >>> > Anything > 0% is too high. >>> > >>> > Ken >>> > >>> > Ken >>> >>> How high? >>> >>> =================== >>> From what I've seen its around 30%. >> >>"From what I've seen"? What would that be? > > In 2007 Newsblaze reported that approximately 30 percent of the > inmates in California prisons are illegal aliens, or "documented > criminals,". So its less than 30%, since documented criminals aren't > illegals. > > BK So what exactly is a "documented criminal" ?
From: MNMikeW on 12 May 2010 15:15 <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message news:rqslu5thq97pkje9qv523pbgsvvq3qg26e(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 May 2010 13:23:53 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> > wrote: > >> >><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >>news:8mplu55fhk4skkke3aeqtgpvoofhtprsf9(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 12 May 2010 12:29:46 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"F. Kurgan Gringioni" <kgringioni(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>news:hsekqa$v2l$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>>>> Meghan McCain had some choice words for Sarah Palin, former Rep. Tom >>>>> Tancredo and the conservative Tea Party movement as a whole during her >>>>> appearance Monday on ABC's "The View." >>>>> >>>>> McCain, the daughter of Sen. John McCain known for occasionally >>>>> parting >>>>> ways with the views of her Republican dad, was particularly scathing >>>>> in >>>>> her assessment of Tancredo's speech on the opening day of the National >>>>> Tea >>>>> Party Convention on Thursday in Nashville. In the speech, Tancredo >>>>> said >>>>> people "who could not spell the word vote or say it in English" >>>>> elected >>>>> a >>>>> "committed socialist ideologue" because the country does not require a >>>>> "civics literacy test." >>>>> >>>>> "It's innate racism, and I think it's why young people are turned off >>>>> by >>>>> this movement," McCain said. "And I'm sorry -- revolutions start with >>>>> young people, not with 65-year-old people talking about literacy tests >>>>> and >>>>> people who can't say the word vote in English." >>>>> >>>>All McCains are idiots. What Meghan McCain did here is exactly the same >>>>stereotyping you were just talking about. >>>> >>> How so? She wasn't alluding to a group of people, but to Tancredo. No >>> group made those statements. >>> >>> BK >> >>""It's innate racism, and I think it's why young people are turned off by >>this movement" >>A movement is a group. >> > No group made the comments to which McCain was responding. Only > Tancredo. > > BK And what group was Tancredo speaking to? So Meghan misspoke. She's should have said "It's innate racism, and I think it's why young people are turned off by Tom Tancredo".
From: MNMikeW on 12 May 2010 15:16
"Loudon Briggs" <larebe(a)bbz.net> wrote in message news:qoslu5to8ubee9essl8dghls46qlk050s7(a)4ax.com... > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> > > > >>this movement" >>A movement is a group. >> > > Not neccessarily... there may/can be several "groups" within a > "movement." > Very true Loudon. It can also be something you do in the morning. ;-) |