From: kenpitts on 28 Mar 2010 12:54 On Mar 27, 6:22 pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > In article > <50a7bb65-c225-4412-99e5-e2bcd6cae...(a)z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>, > > kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 22, 8:41 pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth-gladney/ > > > > Where is the left dominated mainstream media on this one? Hiding > > > behind their agenda of course. > > > > Ken > > > For those who think Kenneth Gladney was faking. > > >http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/11/breaking-charges-filed-i... > > dney-case/ > > > Ken > > I'm sorry, Ken. > > How does that prove that Gladney wasn't faking? > > -- > Alan Baker > Vancouver, British Columbia > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> Usually the police and prosecutors are pretty good at spotting a scam. Also, where did I say anything about proof? I am beginning to think that you and henniebogan are one in the same. Ken
From: Alan Baker on 28 Mar 2010 14:32 In article <058e35b3-c4e2-472b-81ee-50555389702f(a)x12g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>, kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 27, 6:22�pm, Alan Baker <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > In article > > <50a7bb65-c225-4412-99e5-e2bcd6cae...(a)z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>, > > > > �kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 22, 8:41�pm, kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/10/i-am-kenneth-gladney/ > > > > > > Where is the left dominated mainstream media on this one? Hiding > > > > behind their agenda of course. > > > > > > Ken > > > > > For those who think Kenneth Gladney was faking. > > > > >http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/11/breaking-charges-filed-i... > > > dney-case/ > > > > > Ken > > > > I'm sorry, Ken. > > > > How does that prove that Gladney wasn't faking? > > > > -- > > Alan Baker > > Vancouver, British Columbia > > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> > > > Usually the police and prosecutors are pretty good at spotting a > scam. Usually. > > Also, where did I say anything about proof? I am beginning to think > that you and henniebogan are one in the same. You believe what you need to believe, Ken. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: Carbon on 29 Mar 2010 00:12 On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:54:48 -0400, William Clark wrote: > In article > <94034b0f-1d04-455f-867e-a75e9ab612d8(a)g19g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, > kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 23, 8:08 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >> state.edu> wrote: >>> In article >>> <18a5271a-2e5f-4a82-81b7-45928eb06...(a)y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, >>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Do a search on Kenneth Gladney. >>> >>> A link to the Moonies. >> >> OK. Here it is not in the Washington Times. >> >> http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/abreitbart/2009/08/09/i-am-kenneth- gladney/ > > Oh. wow, another loony wingnut blog. Ken, you just get funnier and > funnier. The link has the first few paragraphs, followed by "you can read the column in full here," which naturally points back to everyone's favorite cult rag, the Washington Times. I'm not familiar with Breitbart. But this article sucks. Bias is one thing, but this clown has all the subtlety of a sledgehammer.
From: William Clark on 29 Mar 2010 08:01 In article <4bb028c2$0$20985$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:54:48 -0400, William Clark wrote: > > In article > > <94034b0f-1d04-455f-867e-a75e9ab612d8(a)g19g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, > > kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 23, 8:08 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > >> state.edu> wrote: > >>> In article > >>> <18a5271a-2e5f-4a82-81b7-45928eb06...(a)y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, > >>> kenpitts <ken.p...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Do a search on Kenneth Gladney. > >>> > >>> A link to the Moonies. > >> > >> OK. Here it is not in the Washington Times. > >> > >> http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/abreitbart/2009/08/09/i-am-kenneth- > gladney/ > > > > Oh. wow, another loony wingnut blog. Ken, you just get funnier and > > funnier. > > The link has the first few paragraphs, followed by "you can read the > column in full here," which naturally points back to everyone's favorite > cult rag, the Washington Times. > > I'm not familiar with Breitbart. But this article sucks. Bias is one > thing, but this clown has all the subtlety of a sledgehammer. Right up Ken's alley, then.
From: Bobster on 2 Apr 2010 18:55 "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:d453f59e-6a10-47f3-989d-289a38a22a6f(a)q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com... >Evidence? Who needs it? Which morons like you often do.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Our tea party friends Next: As a liberal, I don't like Obama's health reform |