I guess I am the onl one who thinks this is a problem.............
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 18 Jul 2010 15:03 In article <c88b78c1-857b-4ab9-bdb6-1785405edd5b(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 18, 9:36�am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:34:50 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > > > ........... that needs correcting. > > > > > Ken > > > > For the love of all that's holy, please stop. > > I stop when he stops. So, you think that getting out on world-wide TV > is not a problem? > > Do you want to call off that bet or not? As we move forward, I think > the advantage starts to shift to me. I think it is 50-50 right now. > > Ken Why is it that you hold absolutely everyone in this group in utter contempt, Ken? Why is it that the expressed wish of people you call your friends is utterly unimportant to you? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: William Clark on 18 Jul 2010 15:35 In article <MPG.26ad5783915e2c01989870(a)news.giganews.com>, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0007(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > [William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>] > [Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:18:08 -0400] > > : Actually, the simple solution was to watch the BBC feed on DirecTV. They > : gave Tiger the exposure that his position in the tournament merited, > : i.e. practically none, and concentrated on those in contention instead. > > Either you went for a bathroom break with alarming frequency, or you're > lying. I was watching the BBC's coverage, and they showed every shot > Tiger Woods took on the first six holes. Then and only then, when it > was clear that updates weren't needed for his play, did they move to > showing only about one out of every three of his shots. They continued > to show about a third of his shots until he finished, regardless. Yes, well he was out early so there was not much else happening. Besides, he might have made a move if he had scored on those early holes. He didn't, and once the leaders started to tee off, away went Tiger. You need to try ESPN/ABC.
From: BAR on 18 Jul 2010 16:11 In article <wclark2-EDCB4A.15351018072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > In article <MPG.26ad5783915e2c01989870(a)news.giganews.com>, > Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0007(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > [William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>] > > [Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:18:08 -0400] > > > > : Actually, the simple solution was to watch the BBC feed on DirecTV. They > > : gave Tiger the exposure that his position in the tournament merited, > > : i.e. practically none, and concentrated on those in contention instead. > > > > Either you went for a bathroom break with alarming frequency, or you're > > lying. I was watching the BBC's coverage, and they showed every shot > > Tiger Woods took on the first six holes. Then and only then, when it > > was clear that updates weren't needed for his play, did they move to > > showing only about one out of every three of his shots. They continued > > to show about a third of his shots until he finished, regardless. > > Yes, well he was out early so there was not much else happening. > Besides, he might have made a move if he had scored on those early > holes. He didn't, and once the leaders started to tee off, away went > Tiger. > > You need to try ESPN/ABC. You got caught posting at the turn again huh Billy?
From: Antonio Veranos on 18 Jul 2010 16:44 [William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>] [Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:35:10 -0400] : You need to try ESPN/ABC. I live in the UK. -- Antonio Veranos What color does a smurf go when you choke it?
From: William Clark on 18 Jul 2010 18:22
In article <MPG.26ad2a0761f6bf7798a127(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-EDCB4A.15351018072010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > In article <MPG.26ad5783915e2c01989870(a)news.giganews.com>, > > Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0007(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > [William Clark <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>] > > > [Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:18:08 -0400] > > > > > > : Actually, the simple solution was to watch the BBC feed on DirecTV. > > > : They > > > : gave Tiger the exposure that his position in the tournament merited, > > > : i.e. practically none, and concentrated on those in contention instead. > > > > > > Either you went for a bathroom break with alarming frequency, or you're > > > lying. I was watching the BBC's coverage, and they showed every shot > > > Tiger Woods took on the first six holes. Then and only then, when it > > > was clear that updates weren't needed for his play, did they move to > > > showing only about one out of every three of his shots. They continued > > > to show about a third of his shots until he finished, regardless. > > > > Yes, well he was out early so there was not much else happening. > > Besides, he might have made a move if he had scored on those early > > holes. He didn't, and once the leaders started to tee off, away went > > Tiger. > > > > You need to try ESPN/ABC. > > You got caught posting at the turn again huh Billy? Beg your pardon? You didn't see the BBC coverage then, did you? The average UK viewer's "Tiger exposure" would have ESPN/ABC executives running for the hills in desperation. Perhaps you can use your "retirement" to catch up to the rest of the world? |