From: dsc-ky on 19 Jul 2010 11:26 > So, you think that getting out on world-wide TV > is not a problem? I kind of cringe when I see a golfer (any golfer) throw a fit after a bad shot whether it has the accompaning foul language and/or flying clubs or not. I typically don't want to be around those kind of people. I don't personally think Tiger's language is a serious threat to the tour in any way. I'm sure they would "prefer" he clean it up though.
From: MNMikeW on 19 Jul 2010 12:43 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-FB879D.12033318072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article > <c88b78c1-857b-4ab9-bdb6-1785405edd5b(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, > kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 18, 9:36 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:34:50 -0700, kenpitts wrote: >> > > ........... that needs correcting. >> > >> > > Ken >> > >> > For the love of all that's holy, please stop. >> >> I stop when he stops. So, you think that getting out on world-wide TV >> is not a problem? >> >> Do you want to call off that bet or not? As we move forward, I think >> the advantage starts to shift to me. I think it is 50-50 right now. >> >> Ken > > Why is it that you hold absolutely everyone in this group in utter > contempt, Ken? > > Why is it that the expressed wish of people you call your friends is > utterly unimportant to you? > You, like everybody else saw the title of this thread. You could have ignored it. But you chose not to. Waaaa, Ken posted something I didn't like and I don't have the self-control to ignore it.
From: MNMikeW on 19 Jul 2010 12:44 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-4464DB.17064518072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <4c4392c8$0$8003$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:49:36 -0700, kenpitts wrote: >> > On Jul 18, 9:36� am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:34:50 -0700, kenpitts wrote: >> >> >> >>> ........... that needs correcting. >> >>> >> >>> Ken >> >> >> >> For the love of all that's holy, please stop. >> > >> > I stop when he stops. So, you think that getting out on world-wide TV >> > is >> > not a problem? >> >> You're being inconsiderate to people in a public forum and you're >> totally unapologetic about it. Do you not realize that you're doing >> essentially the same thing as Tiger? > > Far worse than Tiger: > > He knows he's offending people whom he has claimed as friends and he is > not doing it in the heat of the moment. > > -- > Alan Baker > Vancouver, British Columbia > <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> Offensive, LOL! Pussys!
From: Alan Baker on 19 Jul 2010 13:24 In article <8ajdmdFi8rU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-FB879D.12033318072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article > > <c88b78c1-857b-4ab9-bdb6-1785405edd5b(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, > > kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jul 18, 9:36 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:34:50 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > >> > > ........... that needs correcting. > >> > > >> > > Ken > >> > > >> > For the love of all that's holy, please stop. > >> > >> I stop when he stops. So, you think that getting out on world-wide TV > >> is not a problem? > >> > >> Do you want to call off that bet or not? As we move forward, I think > >> the advantage starts to shift to me. I think it is 50-50 right now. > >> > >> Ken > > > > Why is it that you hold absolutely everyone in this group in utter > > contempt, Ken? > > > > Why is it that the expressed wish of people you call your friends is > > utterly unimportant to you? > > > You, like everybody else saw the title of this thread. You could have > ignored it. But you chose not to. Waaaa, Ken posted something I didn't like > and I don't have the self-control to ignore it. Not at all. I like pointing out the hypocrisy of people! But if we go down that road, you saw my reply to Ken and didn't have the self-control to ignore it, huh? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dene on 19 Jul 2010 13:53
"Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-360E4E.10243919072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <8ajdmdFi8rU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > news:alangbaker-FB879D.12033318072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > In article > > > <c88b78c1-857b-4ab9-bdb6-1785405edd5b(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, > > > kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On Jul 18, 9:36 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > >> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:34:50 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > > >> > > ........... that needs correcting. > > >> > > > >> > > Ken > > >> > > > >> > For the love of all that's holy, please stop. > > >> > > >> I stop when he stops. So, you think that getting out on world-wide TV > > >> is not a problem? > > >> > > >> Do you want to call off that bet or not? As we move forward, I think > > >> the advantage starts to shift to me. I think it is 50-50 right now. > > >> > > >> Ken > > > > > > Why is it that you hold absolutely everyone in this group in utter > > > contempt, Ken? > > > > > > Why is it that the expressed wish of people you call your friends is > > > utterly unimportant to you? > > > > > You, like everybody else saw the title of this thread. You could have > > ignored it. But you chose not to. Waaaa, Ken posted something I didn't like > > and I don't have the self-control to ignore it. > > Not at all. > > I like pointing out the hypocrisy of people! > > But if we go down that road, you saw my reply to Ken and didn't have the > self-control to ignore it, huh? Mike was simply pointing out your hypocrisy. -Greg |