I guess I am the onl one who thinks this is a problem.............
in [Golf]
|
From: Alan Baker on 19 Jul 2010 13:56 In article <8ajhi2FaovU2(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-360E4E.10243919072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <8ajdmdFi8rU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > news:alangbaker-FB879D.12033318072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > In article > > > > <c88b78c1-857b-4ab9-bdb6-1785405edd5b(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, > > > > kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Jul 18, 9:36 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > >> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:34:50 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > > > >> > > ........... that needs correcting. > > > >> > > > > >> > > Ken > > > >> > > > > >> > For the love of all that's holy, please stop. > > > >> > > > >> I stop when he stops. So, you think that getting out on world-wide TV > > > >> is not a problem? > > > >> > > > >> Do you want to call off that bet or not? As we move forward, I think > > > >> the advantage starts to shift to me. I think it is 50-50 right now. > > > >> > > > >> Ken > > > > > > > > Why is it that you hold absolutely everyone in this group in utter > > > > contempt, Ken? > > > > > > > > Why is it that the expressed wish of people you call your friends is > > > > utterly unimportant to you? > > > > > > > You, like everybody else saw the title of this thread. You could have > > > ignored it. But you chose not to. Waaaa, Ken posted something I didn't > like > > > and I don't have the self-control to ignore it. > > > > Not at all. > > > > I like pointing out the hypocrisy of people! > > > > But if we go down that road, you saw my reply to Ken and didn't have the > > self-control to ignore it, huh? > > Mike was simply pointing out your hypocrisy. > > -Greg I see. So it's hypocritical for me to point out Ken's hypocrisy but when Mike points out that which doesn't exist, that's *not* hypocritical? LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dene on 19 Jul 2010 14:31 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-9F07E0.10560519072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <8ajhi2FaovU2(a)mid.individual.net>, > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > news:alangbaker-360E4E.10243919072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > In article <8ajdmdFi8rU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > > news:alangbaker-FB879D.12033318072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > > In article > > > > > <c88b78c1-857b-4ab9-bdb6-1785405edd5b(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On Jul 18, 9:36 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > >> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:34:50 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > > > > >> > > ........... that needs correcting. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Ken > > > > >> > > > > > >> > For the love of all that's holy, please stop. > > > > >> > > > > >> I stop when he stops. So, you think that getting out on world-wide TV > > > > >> is not a problem? > > > > >> > > > > >> Do you want to call off that bet or not? As we move forward, I think > > > > >> the advantage starts to shift to me. I think it is 50-50 right now. > > > > >> > > > > >> Ken > > > > > > > > > > Why is it that you hold absolutely everyone in this group in utter > > > > > contempt, Ken? > > > > > > > > > > Why is it that the expressed wish of people you call your friends is > > > > > utterly unimportant to you? > > > > > > > > > You, like everybody else saw the title of this thread. You could have > > > > ignored it. But you chose not to. Waaaa, Ken posted something I didn't > > like > > > > and I don't have the self-control to ignore it. > > > > > > Not at all. > > > > > > I like pointing out the hypocrisy of people! > > > > > > But if we go down that road, you saw my reply to Ken and didn't have the > > > self-control to ignore it, huh? > > > > Mike was simply pointing out your hypocrisy. > > > > -Greg > > I see. > > So it's hypocritical for me to point out Ken's hypocrisy but when Mike > points out that which doesn't exist, that's *not* hypocritical? > > LOL You are a troll and you are guilty of posting private e-mail on RSG. You point out the splinter in one's eye while having the log in your own, hypocrite. -Greg
From: Alan Baker on 19 Jul 2010 14:30 In article <8ajjokFomjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-9F07E0.10560519072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > In article <8ajhi2FaovU2(a)mid.individual.net>, > > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > news:alangbaker-360E4E.10243919072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > In article <8ajdmdFi8rU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > > > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > > > > news:alangbaker-FB879D.12033318072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > <c88b78c1-857b-4ab9-bdb6-1785405edd5b(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > kenpitts <ken.ptts(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Jul 18, 9:36 am, Carbon <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:34:50 -0700, kenpitts wrote: > > > > > >> > > ........... that needs correcting. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Ken > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > For the love of all that's holy, please stop. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I stop when he stops. So, you think that getting out on > world-wide TV > > > > > >> is not a problem? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Do you want to call off that bet or not? As we move forward, I > think > > > > > >> the advantage starts to shift to me. I think it is 50-50 right > now. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Ken > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is it that you hold absolutely everyone in this group in utter > > > > > > contempt, Ken? > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is it that the expressed wish of people you call your friends > is > > > > > > utterly unimportant to you? > > > > > > > > > > > You, like everybody else saw the title of this thread. You could > have > > > > > ignored it. But you chose not to. Waaaa, Ken posted something I > didn't > > > like > > > > > and I don't have the self-control to ignore it. > > > > > > > > Not at all. > > > > > > > > I like pointing out the hypocrisy of people! > > > > > > > > But if we go down that road, you saw my reply to Ken and didn't have > the > > > > self-control to ignore it, huh? > > > > > > Mike was simply pointing out your hypocrisy. > > > > > > -Greg > > > > I see. > > > > So it's hypocritical for me to point out Ken's hypocrisy but when Mike > > points out that which doesn't exist, that's *not* hypocritical? > > > > LOL > > You are a troll and you are guilty of posting private e-mail on RSG. I "guilty", am I? LOL I did what I told Ken I would do if he continued to bother me via private email, and he consented to my doing so by continuing. Ken has agreed this was the case. > You > point out the splinter in one's eye while having the log in your own, > hypocrite. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
From: dene on 19 Jul 2010 17:08 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-611D1C.11305819072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > > > > > Mike was simply pointing out your hypocrisy. > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > I see. > > > > > > So it's hypocritical for me to point out Ken's hypocrisy but when Mike > > > points out that which doesn't exist, that's *not* hypocritical? > > > > > > LOL > > > > You are a troll and you are guilty of posting private e-mail on RSG. > > I "guilty", am I? LOL > > I did what I told Ken I would do if he continued to bother me via > private email, and he consented to my doing so by continuing. > > Ken has agreed this was the case. Funny thing. Virtually everyone in RSG condemned you for it. Why is that if your action was justifiable or reasonable? > > You > > point out the splinter in one's eye while having the log in your own, > > hypocrite. > > LOL Do you always use this acrononym when cornered? -Greg
From: Alan Baker on 19 Jul 2010 17:11
In article <8ajsv1Fjj3U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message > news:alangbaker-611D1C.11305819072010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > > > > > > > > Mike was simply pointing out your hypocrisy. > > > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > > > I see. > > > > > > > > So it's hypocritical for me to point out Ken's hypocrisy but when Mike > > > > points out that which doesn't exist, that's *not* hypocritical? > > > > > > > > LOL > > > > > > You are a troll and you are guilty of posting private e-mail on RSG. > > > > I "guilty", am I? LOL > > > > I did what I told Ken I would do if he continued to bother me via > > private email, and he consented to my doing so by continuing. > > > > Ken has agreed this was the case. > > Funny thing. Virtually everyone in RSG condemned you for it. Why is that > if your action was justifiable or reasonable? Because Ken is the only one whose opinion counts. He's admitted that he tacitly agreed to my actions by continuing to email me after being warned (twice!) that doing so would result in his little whines being reposted here. > > > > You > > > point out the splinter in one's eye while having the log in your own, > > > hypocrite. > > > > LOL > > Do you always use this acrononym when cornered? I haven't been cornered, so I can't answer that question. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia <http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg> |