"I'm sorry, BP!"
in [Golf]
|
Prev: Putter Type Question ?
Next: Worse than vuvuzelas...
From: Frank Ketchum on 25 Jun 2010 11:14 "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message news:MPG.268e8f83ba52b81e98a0a4(a)news.giganews.com... > In article <Yu3Vn.74$f_3.12(a)newsfe17.iad>, nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu > says... >> >> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:a5dd38e9-a5bc-4482-bf9f-d5f8b05a4a32(a)u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> On Jun 25, 8:16 am, "Frank Ketchum" <nos...(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: >> > <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message >> > >> > news:g858265qss45j4gu8l2gcj6bs33t4gftid(a)4ax.com... >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:02:54 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" >> > > <nos...(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: >> > >> > >>"Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> > >> > >>> Barring some OJ-like brainfart by the legal system, BP will be >> > >>> found >> > >>> liable for this disaster. But no need to apologize--long before any >> > >>> legal >> > >>> judgment transpires most of its assets will be transferred to >> > >>> points >> > >>> unknown and the taxpayers will get stuck with the bill. >> > >> > >>Bullshit. Oil companies require massive capital which doesn't >> > >>disappear >> > >>into the ether. You think that BP station on the corner is going to >> > >>vanish >> > >>to "points unknown"? >> > >> > >>And even if this were true, where is your concern about the bill the >> > >>taxpayer is getting stuck with aside from the cleanup effort? Taken a >> > >>look >> > >>at federal gubmint spending lately? >> > >> > > Surely you don't think that the taxpayers of America shouldn't be >> > > concerned about getting stuck with these costs. >> > >> > We will be stuck paying for them whether we pay through the government >> > or >> > we >> > pay through the gasoline pump. >> >> We will not be stuck paying for them. BP will pay for them. If the >> cost of BP gasoline goes up as a result, then don't buy it. >> >> - - - >> >> IF the price goes up? >> >> I should know better than to bring up the point that it is the consumer >> that >> bears all costs of producing a product. > > Next he is going to tell you that businesses pay taxes too. Now you've stepped in it. Prepare for the attack of the economically ignorant masses.
From: Carbon on 26 Jun 2010 09:59 On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:52:28 +0000, Moderate wrote: > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:22:51 +0000, Moderate wrote: >> >>> Obama is an idiot. >> >> Obama put himself through law school and taught constitutional law >> for 10+ years. You may not agree with his politics, but he is quite >> obviously not an idiot. If you can't see that, then you're an idiot. > > Right into the personal insults. How is that working for you? You set yourself up for it by saying ridiculous things. Obama is obviously not an idiot. You are apparently incapable of making this determination on your own. What do you expect?
From: Moderate on 26 Jun 2010 11:13 Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:52:28 +0000, Moderate wrote: >> Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:22:51 +0000, Moderate wrote: >>> >>>> Obama is an idiot. >>> >>> Obama put himself through law school and taught constitutional law >>> for 10+ years. You may not agree with his politics, but he is quite >>> obviously not an idiot. If you can't see that, then you're an idiot. >> >> Right into the personal insults. How is that working for you? > > You set yourself up for it by saying ridiculous things. Obama is > obviously not an idiot. You are apparently incapable of making this > determination on your own. What do you expect? I expect you will keep making childish insults. In fact, I guarantee it.
From: William Clark on 26 Jun 2010 12:10 In article <1595924848299257465.608618nospam-nomail.comu(a)news.suddenlink.net>, Moderate <nospam(a)nomail.comu> wrote: > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:52:28 +0000, Moderate wrote: > >> Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:22:51 +0000, Moderate wrote: > >>> > >>>> Obama is an idiot. > >>> > >>> Obama put himself through law school and taught constitutional law > >>> for 10+ years. You may not agree with his politics, but he is quite > >>> obviously not an idiot. If you can't see that, then you're an idiot. > >> > >> Right into the personal insults. How is that working for you? > > > > You set yourself up for it by saying ridiculous things. Obama is > > obviously not an idiot. You are apparently incapable of making this > > determination on your own. What do you expect? > > I expect you will keep making childish insults. In fact, I guarantee it. And we expect you will keep on making brainless, stupid, remarks. In fact, we guarantee it.
From: Carbon on 26 Jun 2010 20:06
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:13:24 +0000, Moderate wrote: > Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:52:28 +0000, Moderate wrote: >>> Carbon <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:22:51 +0000, Moderate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Obama is an idiot. >>>> >>>> Obama put himself through law school and taught constitutional law >>>> for 10+ years. You may not agree with his politics, but he is quite >>>> obviously not an idiot. If you can't see that, then you're an idiot. >>> >>> Right into the personal insults. How is that working for you? >> >> You set yourself up for it by saying ridiculous things. Obama is >> obviously not an idiot. You are apparently incapable of making this >> determination on your own. What do you expect? > > I expect you will keep making childish insults. In fact, I guarantee it. I hereby solemnly swear that if you stop saying idiotic things I will stop saying you're an idiot. |