From: dene on

<bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
news:he60v5916cp1npbb7g21h0ft17sh99hehs(a)4ax.com...
> On Sun, 16 May 2010 09:09:57 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <4befeb08$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>
> >> It is interesting to me that so many anti-abortion crusaders absolutely
> >> love capital punishment. Why is that? Is human life sacred or not
> >> (assuming for the sake of argument that fetuses are people, which
they're
> >> not)?
> >
> >Should a man be condemed for what he does?
> No
> >
> >Should a man be condemed for what he thinks?
> No
> >
> >Should a man be condemed because he is an inconvienence?
> No
>
> Now reach down in that shallow brain pan and put these questions in
> response to Carbon's. Then you may realize that your status quo is a
> non sequitur. You really are all over the place and have no
> concentrated thought.
>
> BK

BS BK. Bert's position on abortion is quite clear. He answered Carb's
questions quite well. The death penalty is based on the choices the
criminal makes. An unborn child has no choices.

You, Carbs, and Billy need to deal with what he posts instead of resorting
to the "stupid" card. It makes you guys look unintelligent.

-Greg


From: bknight on
On Sun, 16 May 2010 11:00:53 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com>
wrote:

>
><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>news:he60v5916cp1npbb7g21h0ft17sh99hehs(a)4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 16 May 2010 09:09:57 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <4befeb08$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
>> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>
>> >> It is interesting to me that so many anti-abortion crusaders absolutely
>> >> love capital punishment. Why is that? Is human life sacred or not
>> >> (assuming for the sake of argument that fetuses are people, which
>they're
>> >> not)?
>> >
>> >Should a man be condemed for what he does?
>> No
>> >
>> >Should a man be condemed for what he thinks?
>> No
>> >
>> >Should a man be condemed because he is an inconvienence?
>> No
>>
>> Now reach down in that shallow brain pan and put these questions in
>> response to Carbon's. Then you may realize that your status quo is a
>> non sequitur. You really are all over the place and have no
>> concentrated thought.
>>
>> BK
>
>BS BK. Bert's position on abortion is quite clear. He answered Carb's
>questions quite well. The death penalty is based on the choices the
>criminal makes. An unborn child has no choices.
>
>You, Carbs, and Billy need to deal with what he posts instead of resorting
>to the "stupid" card. It makes you guys look unintelligent.
>
>-Greg
>
You're wrong. Though Bert's position is clear these questions didn't
reply to Carb's at all.
K
From: bknight on
On Sun, 16 May 2010 13:38:24 -0500, bknight(a)conramp.net wrote:

>On Sun, 16 May 2010 11:00:53 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>>news:he60v5916cp1npbb7g21h0ft17sh99hehs(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 16 May 2010 09:09:57 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <4befeb08$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
>>> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
>>>
>>> >> It is interesting to me that so many anti-abortion crusaders absolutely
>>> >> love capital punishment. Why is that? Is human life sacred or not
>>> >> (assuming for the sake of argument that fetuses are people, which
>>they're
>>> >> not)?
>>> >
>>> >Should a man be condemed for what he does?
>>> No
>>> >
>>> >Should a man be condemed for what he thinks?
>>> No
>>> >
>>> >Should a man be condemed because he is an inconvienence?
>>> No
>>>
>>> Now reach down in that shallow brain pan and put these questions in
>>> response to Carbon's. Then you may realize that your status quo is a
>>> non sequitur. You really are all over the place and have no
>>> concentrated thought.
>>>
>>> BK
>>
>>BS BK. Bert's position on abortion is quite clear. He answered Carb's
>>questions quite well. The death penalty is based on the choices the
>>criminal makes. An unborn child has no choices.
>>
>>You, Carbs, and Billy need to deal with what he posts instead of resorting
>>to the "stupid" card. It makes you guys look unintelligent.
>>
>>-Greg
>>
You're wrong. Though Bert's position is clear these questions didn't
reply to Carb's at all. They are all good questions though.

There's no way that Bert can make anyone look unintelligent. As I
said, he's all over the place, and its hard to deal with posts that
don't conform to other's. I know that you agree with his stance on
this subject, and that's fine. However, Carb's opinion is just as
valid.

BK

From: BAR on
In article <85apv7F4jbU2(a)mid.individual.net>, dene(a)remove.ipns.com
says...
>
> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> news:he60v5916cp1npbb7g21h0ft17sh99hehs(a)4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 16 May 2010 09:09:57 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> > >In article <4befeb08$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> > >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >
> > >> It is interesting to me that so many anti-abortion crusaders absolutely
> > >> love capital punishment. Why is that? Is human life sacred or not
> > >> (assuming for the sake of argument that fetuses are people, which
> they're
> > >> not)?
> > >
> > >Should a man be condemed for what he does?
> > No
> > >
> > >Should a man be condemed for what he thinks?
> > No
> > >
> > >Should a man be condemed because he is an inconvienence?
> > No
> >
> > Now reach down in that shallow brain pan and put these questions in
> > response to Carbon's. Then you may realize that your status quo is a
> > non sequitur. You really are all over the place and have no
> > concentrated thought.
> >
> > BK
>
> BS BK. Bert's position on abortion is quite clear. He answered Carb's
> questions quite well. The death penalty is based on the choices the
> criminal makes. An unborn child has no choices.
>
> You, Carbs, and Billy need to deal with what he posts instead of resorting
> to the "stupid" card. It makes you guys look unintelligent.

Bobby doesn't like opposing views and he doesn't like people who really
don't care about his opinion of them.

I answered Carb's questions. Bobby just doesn't like the way I answered
them.



From: BAR on
In article <npe0v5df9m37t1fa04eg0at294dltml7oh(a)4ax.com>,
bknight(a)conramp.net says...
>
> On Sun, 16 May 2010 11:00:53 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> >news:he60v5916cp1npbb7g21h0ft17sh99hehs(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 16 May 2010 09:09:57 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <4befeb08$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> >> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> >>
> >> >> It is interesting to me that so many anti-abortion crusaders absolutely
> >> >> love capital punishment. Why is that? Is human life sacred or not
> >> >> (assuming for the sake of argument that fetuses are people, which
> >they're
> >> >> not)?
> >> >
> >> >Should a man be condemed for what he does?
> >> No
> >> >
> >> >Should a man be condemed for what he thinks?
> >> No
> >> >
> >> >Should a man be condemed because he is an inconvienence?
> >> No
> >>
> >> Now reach down in that shallow brain pan and put these questions in
> >> response to Carbon's. Then you may realize that your status quo is a
> >> non sequitur. You really are all over the place and have no
> >> concentrated thought.
> >>
> >> BK
> >
> >BS BK. Bert's position on abortion is quite clear. He answered Carb's
> >questions quite well. The death penalty is based on the choices the
> >criminal makes. An unborn child has no choices.
> >
> >You, Carbs, and Billy need to deal with what he posts instead of resorting
> >to the "stupid" card. It makes you guys look unintelligent.
> >
> >-Greg
> >
> You're wrong. Though Bert's position is clear these questions didn't
> reply to Carb's at all.
> K

Sure they did, you just fail to see how they respond to Carbs. You don't
always get the answer you want.