Illegal alien rights in the U.S.
in [Golf]
|
From: William Clark on 16 May 2010 17:54 In article <MPG.265a1a7ef2d47122989f4d(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <wclark2-489563.12244416052010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > It is interesting to me that so many anti-abortion crusaders absolutely > > > > love capital punishment. Why is that? Is human life sacred or not > > > > (assuming for the sake of argument that fetuses are people, which > > > > they're > > > > not) > > > > > > Should a man be condemed for what he does? > > > > > > Should a man be condemed for what he thinks? > > > > > > Should a man be condemed because he is an inconvienence? > > > > Whoosh. > > > > Give it some thought first Billy. Only if you will next time. You clearly switched off on this one.
From: William Clark on 16 May 2010 18:00 In article <MPG.265a17922029c871989f4a(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <npe0v5df9m37t1fa04eg0at294dltml7oh(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > > > On Sun, 16 May 2010 11:00:53 -0700, "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > ><bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > >news:he60v5916cp1npbb7g21h0ft17sh99hehs(a)4ax.com... > > >> On Sun, 16 May 2010 09:09:57 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> >In article <4befeb08$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > >> >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > >> > > >> >> It is interesting to me that so many anti-abortion crusaders > > >> >> absolutely > > >> >> love capital punishment. Why is that? Is human life sacred or not > > >> >> (assuming for the sake of argument that fetuses are people, which > > >they're > > >> >> not)? > > >> > > > >> >Should a man be condemed for what he does? > > >> No > > >> > > > >> >Should a man be condemed for what he thinks? > > >> No > > >> > > > >> >Should a man be condemed because he is an inconvienence? > > >> No > > >> > > >> Now reach down in that shallow brain pan and put these questions in > > >> response to Carbon's. Then you may realize that your status quo is a > > >> non sequitur. You really are all over the place and have no > > >> concentrated thought. > > >> > > >> BK > > > > > >BS BK. Bert's position on abortion is quite clear. He answered Carb's > > >questions quite well. The death penalty is based on the choices the > > >criminal makes. An unborn child has no choices. No, abortion is based on the sanctity of human life, and the fact that it is simply wrong to take one. It should apply to all, therefore, and cannot be amended by the fact that they commit a heinous crime. Fancy footwork about "choices" that negate that right at just simple evasion.
From: William Clark on 16 May 2010 18:01 In article <MPG.265a175846128163989f49(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <85apv7F4jbU2(a)mid.individual.net>, dene(a)remove.ipns.com > says... > > > > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > news:he60v5916cp1npbb7g21h0ft17sh99hehs(a)4ax.com... > > > On Sun, 16 May 2010 09:09:57 -0400, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > > >In article <4befeb08$0$4939$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > > >nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > > > >> It is interesting to me that so many anti-abortion crusaders absolutely > > > >> love capital punishment. Why is that? Is human life sacred or not > > > >> (assuming for the sake of argument that fetuses are people, which > > they're > > > >> not)? > > > > > > > >Should a man be condemed for what he does? > > > No > > > > > > > >Should a man be condemed for what he thinks? > > > No > > > > > > > >Should a man be condemed because he is an inconvienence? > > > No > > > > > > Now reach down in that shallow brain pan and put these questions in > > > response to Carbon's. Then you may realize that your status quo is a > > > non sequitur. You really are all over the place and have no > > > concentrated thought. > > > > > > BK > > > > BS BK. Bert's position on abortion is quite clear. He answered Carb's > > questions quite well. The death penalty is based on the choices the > > criminal makes. An unborn child has no choices. > > > > You, Carbs, and Billy need to deal with what he posts instead of resorting > > to the "stupid" card. It makes you guys look unintelligent. > > Bobby doesn't like opposing views and he doesn't like people who really > don't care about his opinion of them. > > I answered Carb's questions. Bobby just doesn't like the way I answered > them. That's because your answers were a) evasive and b) just plain dumb.
From: William Clark on 16 May 2010 18:02 In article <MPG.265a187ba5b8a977989f4b(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <81f0v51p7kadv7dk9149i8hr7kd32jatu9(a)4ax.com>, > bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > You're wrong. Though Bert's position is clear these questions didn't > > reply to Carb's at all. They are all good questions though. > > > > There's no way that Bert can make anyone look unintelligent. As I > > said, he's all over the place, and its hard to deal with posts that > > don't conform to other's. I know that you agree with his stance on > > this subject, and that's fine. However, Carb's opinion is just as > > valid. > > "Its hard to deal with posts that don't conform to other's", too > freaking bad. > > This is not an inquisition or an interrogation. I owe you nothing. I > will responde to posts in any manner I chose to respond. If you can't > see that the queations I asked Carbs have meaning then you are not a > bright as you thing you are. OK, then how about "choosing" to respond to them in English for a change? That would at least be some kind of start.
From: Jack Hollis on 16 May 2010 19:48
On Sun, 16 May 2010 13:09:04 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote: >> Why can you be charged, tried, and convicted of murdering a "not >> people?" > >Why aren't miscarried children given last rites? First according to the Catholic Church, Last Rights are given to people who are still alive. Second, the person must be a baptized member of the church in the first place. Third, to receive Last Rights you must be of the age of reason. |