From: Billy on
In article <T9GHn.11587$Gx2.522(a)newsfe20.iad>,
"Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:

> <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> news:p1ftu51i6msp3f3e9ghmpi8ico1ij6l2o6(a)4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:42:19 -0400, "Frank Ketchum"
> > <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>There is nothing like a good old fashioned abortion discussion to fully
> >>highlight the complete moral bankruptcy of the left. Not that I am being
> >>critical, some of the funniest things you can read are posts where
> >>liberals
> >>bend and contort to try to come up with defenses for abortion. Fun stuff!
> >>
> > That is the main reason that absolutely refuse to discuss it. I also
> > refuse to state that either the left, or the right, is morally
> > bankrupt. That would put me in a position of thinking that I have a
> > moral superiority to either.
> >
> > You really don't enjoy that position Frank. You're painting with a
> > wide brush since all liberals don't disagree with you on abortion.
>
> I, Bobby, have no problem stating that a political movement that condones
> the murder of 800,000+ people a year is morally bankrupt. I have no problem
> saying that a position promoting life is morally superior to a position
> condoning abortion. You can pretend all you want that one position is not
> morally superior to the other. You are wrong. Period.

Six billion and counting. How many more lives are you going to promote?
Was a time when there were commons that people could hunt in or fish in
for food. Once we hit 9 billion, there is going to be a lot more pain
going around.
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html
From: Billy on
In article <sgrtu51notpmliiimvtcr63n1bgvpdf7bn(a)4ax.com>,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 15 May 2010 11:27:48 -0700, Billy <wildbilly(a)withouta.net>
> wrote:
>
> >There are going to be tears and anguish, but the law should be;
> >your body, your choice.
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgiTrQkH9Jg&feature=related

I don't watch proctology exams either.
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html
From: liberal on
On May 13, 11:47 pm, Strabo <str...(a)flashlight.net> wrote:
> Howard Brazee wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 May 2010 18:47:42 -0400, Strabo <str...(a)flashlight.net>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Illegal aliens are foreign nationals illegally in the US. They are
> >> quite simply, outlaws.
>
> > We've all broken laws.    But our justice system assumes we are
> > innocent until found guilty.
>
> Maybe it's about how you define "we".
>
> If one is within the US and is not demonstrably a citizen of the US,
> and one does not have papers authorizing his presence, then one is a
> foreign national.
>
> Does a Frenchman have 5th A. rights? Germans? Brazilians? Mexicans?
>
> If one is an illegal alien the 5th A. does not apply.
>
> Illegal aliens do not have unalienable rights.

The question over "unalienable rights" may be arguable, but everyone
in the United States has ***LEGAL*** rights vis-a-vis the criminal law
system.

If you can't grasp that distinction...you aren't much of an American.
But a first rate reichtard.
From: liberal on
On May 18, 12:32 pm, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> Strabo  <str...(a)flashlight.net> wrote:
> >Mr.Sandman wrote:
> >> Strabo wrote:
> >>> Mr.Sandman wrote:
> >>>> Strabo the idiot wrote:
>
> ><snipped>
> >> Incoherent bullshit. That paragraph contradicts the previous one.
>
> >> You're still trying to wiggle your way out of this.
> >> You cannot kill or maim someone for being an illegal migrant. Their
> >> offense does not rise to the level where you can do that.
> >> Being in the country without proper documentation is a misdemeanor.
>
> >>> Is this a paradox? Not at all.
>
> >>> 1. Illegal aliens are not at liberty to exercise their unalienable
> >>>    rights because they drew first blood by infringing upon the
> >>>    rights of Americans.
>
> >>> 2. Their status as illegals constitutes a clear and present danger
> >>>    to American life and property.
>
> >>> But you know that. Well, you don't really know it but you suspect
> >>> there's some significance to "rights."
>
> >>> I'm glad to see so many assume that the US Declaration pertains to
> >>> non-Americans. Maybe they'll overthrow their governments and do it right
> >>> next time. But for the time being, documented foreign nationals are
> >>> subject to treaty and their nation's laws.
>
> >> What a stupid thing to say. All men have inalienable rights, not just
> >> U.S citizens.
> >> You cannot enslave anyone even if they are not citizens.
>
> >Try this...
>
> >I'm going to exercise my Right to buy a handgun today. Is our illegal
> >alien going to exercise his right? No. Because he has no such right.
>
> Oooo!  Racist fascism!
>
> You didn't read the Constitution, did you?

He can't find one translated into German.


>
> --
> Ray Fischer        
> rfisc...(a)sonic.net  - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: William Clark on
In article
<wildbilly-579909.14291918052010(a)c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>,
Billy <wildbilly(a)withouta.net> wrote:

> In article
> <2dcc3d95-441d-40e2-9a3d-2903b7c5270f(a)c11g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 16, 10:34�pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com>
> > wrote:
> > > In article <MPG.265a6ab0bb1b43bf989...(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <85bkjoFp1...(a)mid.individual.net>, d...(a)remove.ipns.com
> > > > says...
> > >
> > > > > "BAR" <sc...(a)you.com> wrote in message
> > > > >news:MPG.2659b75cc147c258989f46(a)news.giganews.com...
> > > > > > In article <4befea12$0$12163$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> > > > > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, 16 May 2010 08:18:51 -0400, BAR wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article <4bef658d$0$4863$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>,
> > > > > > > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says...
> > > > > > > >> On Sat, 15 May 2010 20:52:05 -0600, Howard Brazee wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > >>> Do you believe killing an embryo is the same as killing an
> > > > > > > >>> infant?
> > >
> > > > > > > >> No. Embryos are not people.
> > >
> > > > > > > > When does life begin?
> > >
> > > > > > > Birth.
> > >
> > > > > > I hope you never have children.
> > >
> > > > > I hope he does. �We'll see how his cold view of life survives that
> > > > > experience.
> > >
> > > > Think of the children.
> > >
> > > Life begins when the dog dies and the kids leave home.
> >
> > Life begins when the grandchildren are born. I'm looking forward to
> > that more than I looked forward to the births of my own kids.
>
> Life should be looking for the beginnings, not the ends "when the dog
> dies and the kids leave home." Man, that is pathetic.

No more pathetic than your total lack of a sense of humor. Lighten up.