From: Billy on 18 May 2010 17:34 In article <T9GHn.11587$Gx2.522(a)newsfe20.iad>, "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > news:p1ftu51i6msp3f3e9ghmpi8ico1ij6l2o6(a)4ax.com... > > On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:42:19 -0400, "Frank Ketchum" > > <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: > > > > > >>There is nothing like a good old fashioned abortion discussion to fully > >>highlight the complete moral bankruptcy of the left. Not that I am being > >>critical, some of the funniest things you can read are posts where > >>liberals > >>bend and contort to try to come up with defenses for abortion. Fun stuff! > >> > > That is the main reason that absolutely refuse to discuss it. I also > > refuse to state that either the left, or the right, is morally > > bankrupt. That would put me in a position of thinking that I have a > > moral superiority to either. > > > > You really don't enjoy that position Frank. You're painting with a > > wide brush since all liberals don't disagree with you on abortion. > > I, Bobby, have no problem stating that a political movement that condones > the murder of 800,000+ people a year is morally bankrupt. I have no problem > saying that a position promoting life is morally superior to a position > condoning abortion. You can pretend all you want that one position is not > morally superior to the other. You are wrong. Period. Six billion and counting. How many more lives are you going to promote? Was a time when there were commons that people could hunt in or fish in for food. Once we hit 9 billion, there is going to be a lot more pain going around. -- - Billy "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html
From: Billy on 18 May 2010 17:38 In article <sgrtu51notpmliiimvtcr63n1bgvpdf7bn(a)4ax.com>, Jack Hollis <xsleeper(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Sat, 15 May 2010 11:27:48 -0700, Billy <wildbilly(a)withouta.net> > wrote: > > >There are going to be tears and anguish, but the law should be; > >your body, your choice. > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgiTrQkH9Jg&feature=related I don't watch proctology exams either. -- - Billy "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html
From: liberal on 18 May 2010 18:45 On May 13, 11:47 pm, Strabo <str...(a)flashlight.net> wrote: > Howard Brazee wrote: > > On Thu, 13 May 2010 18:47:42 -0400, Strabo <str...(a)flashlight.net> > > wrote: > > >> Illegal aliens are foreign nationals illegally in the US. They are > >> quite simply, outlaws. > > > We've all broken laws. But our justice system assumes we are > > innocent until found guilty. > > Maybe it's about how you define "we". > > If one is within the US and is not demonstrably a citizen of the US, > and one does not have papers authorizing his presence, then one is a > foreign national. > > Does a Frenchman have 5th A. rights? Germans? Brazilians? Mexicans? > > If one is an illegal alien the 5th A. does not apply. > > Illegal aliens do not have unalienable rights. The question over "unalienable rights" may be arguable, but everyone in the United States has ***LEGAL*** rights vis-a-vis the criminal law system. If you can't grasp that distinction...you aren't much of an American. But a first rate reichtard.
From: liberal on 18 May 2010 19:02 On May 18, 12:32 pm, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > Strabo <str...(a)flashlight.net> wrote: > >Mr.Sandman wrote: > >> Strabo wrote: > >>> Mr.Sandman wrote: > >>>> Strabo the idiot wrote: > > ><snipped> > >> Incoherent bullshit. That paragraph contradicts the previous one. > > >> You're still trying to wiggle your way out of this. > >> You cannot kill or maim someone for being an illegal migrant. Their > >> offense does not rise to the level where you can do that. > >> Being in the country without proper documentation is a misdemeanor. > > >>> Is this a paradox? Not at all. > > >>> 1. Illegal aliens are not at liberty to exercise their unalienable > >>> rights because they drew first blood by infringing upon the > >>> rights of Americans. > > >>> 2. Their status as illegals constitutes a clear and present danger > >>> to American life and property. > > >>> But you know that. Well, you don't really know it but you suspect > >>> there's some significance to "rights." > > >>> I'm glad to see so many assume that the US Declaration pertains to > >>> non-Americans. Maybe they'll overthrow their governments and do it right > >>> next time. But for the time being, documented foreign nationals are > >>> subject to treaty and their nation's laws. > > >> What a stupid thing to say. All men have inalienable rights, not just > >> U.S citizens. > >> You cannot enslave anyone even if they are not citizens. > > >Try this... > > >I'm going to exercise my Right to buy a handgun today. Is our illegal > >alien going to exercise his right? No. Because he has no such right. > > Oooo! Racist fascism! > > You didn't read the Constitution, did you? He can't find one translated into German. > > -- > Ray Fischer > rfisc...(a)sonic.net - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: William Clark on 18 May 2010 21:06
In article <wildbilly-579909.14291918052010(a)c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>, Billy <wildbilly(a)withouta.net> wrote: > In article > <2dcc3d95-441d-40e2-9a3d-2903b7c5270f(a)c11g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>, > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 16, 10:34�pm, William Clark <wcla...(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> > > wrote: > > > In article <MPG.265a6ab0bb1b43bf989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > In article <85bkjoFp1...(a)mid.individual.net>, d...(a)remove.ipns.com > > > > says... > > > > > > > > "BAR" <sc...(a)you.com> wrote in message > > > > >news:MPG.2659b75cc147c258989f46(a)news.giganews.com... > > > > > > In article <4befea12$0$12163$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > > > > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 16 May 2010 08:18:51 -0400, BAR wrote: > > > > > > > > In article <4bef658d$0$4863$9a6e1...(a)unlimited.newshosting.com>, > > > > > > > > nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com says... > > > > > > > >> On Sat, 15 May 2010 20:52:05 -0600, Howard Brazee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >>> Do you believe killing an embryo is the same as killing an > > > > > > > >>> infant? > > > > > > > > > > >> No. Embryos are not people. > > > > > > > > > > > When does life begin? > > > > > > > > > > Birth. > > > > > > > > > I hope you never have children. > > > > > > > > I hope he does. �We'll see how his cold view of life survives that > > > > > experience. > > > > > > > Think of the children. > > > > > > Life begins when the dog dies and the kids leave home. > > > > Life begins when the grandchildren are born. I'm looking forward to > > that more than I looked forward to the births of my own kids. > > Life should be looking for the beginnings, not the ends "when the dog > dies and the kids leave home." Man, that is pathetic. No more pathetic than your total lack of a sense of humor. Lighten up. |