Illegal alien rights in the U.S.
in [Golf]
|
From: John B. on 14 May 2010 10:24 On May 13, 9:12 pm, Turban Joe Balasootoe <ddca...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 13, 6:47 pm, Strabo <str...(a)flashlight.net> wrote: > > > > > brad herschel wrote: > > > On May 13, 1:48 pm, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > >> On Thu, 13 May 2010 10:39:55 -0700 (PDT), "Speeders & Drunk Drivers > > > >> are MURDERERS" <beta...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > >>> On May 13, 6:15 am, bkni...(a)conramp.net wrote: > > >>>> This should clear up one misconception here. > > >>>> The fourteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: > > >>>> ...Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property > > >>>> ...without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its > > >>>> jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. > > >>>> ...The Supreme Court has ruled that these provisions apply to all > > >>>> ...persons in the U.S., without regard to race, or nationality. > > >>>> ...Therefore, U.S. residents -- legal and illegal -- have > > >>>> ...constitutional rights such as equal protection of the law and the > > >>>> ...right to due process. > > >>>> BK > > >>> The first words in the constitution are "We the people of the united > > >>> states" and that makes it clear the words people or person refer to > > >>> citizens. The SC takes their usual bribes from Business and ignores > > >>> this. > > >> You're an idiot....and prove it over and over. Keep it up, we need > > >> the laughs. > > > >> BK- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > I would take those "rights" from illegal aliens. Americans should have > > > the right to shoot border crossers at site of invasion, make citizens > > > arrests, seize assets, etc. > > > Uncle Suckemoff is totally inept. > > > Illegal aliens are foreign nationals illegally in the US. They are > > quite simply, outlaws. > > > > > > > > Brad- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Legals are even more of a malediction. Here's one running for > the U.S. Congressional seat in PA's 6th District: Manan Trivedi: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 4. Do you agree that any immigration reform bill should: > > a) Contain a meaningful path to citizenship - one that does > not include overly-punitive fines or a touchback requirement - for law- > abiding undocumented immigrants currently in the United States; > > b) Ensure that expanded legal permanent immigration, rather > than expansion of temporary worker programs, serves as the United > States' primary external answer to workforce shortages; and > > c) Ensure that any non-agricultural temporary worker programs > maintain current caps on the total number of non-agricultural > temporary worker visas issued, and also include a meaningful > prevailing wage requirement keyed to the Service Contract Act and > Davis-Bacon Act? > > "I support all the measures above in a comprehensive immigration > reform bill. I am the son of immigrants and we are a nation that > continues to prosper because of the contributions of immigrants. We > need to pursue comprehensive immigration reform that assures that > America continues to attract and retain the best and brightest from > around the world." (Trivedi) Right on. I'd vote for him.
From: dene on 14 May 2010 12:44 "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message news:MPG.2657136beaaf489a989f0c(a)news.giganews.com... > In article <alangbaker-A1F417.00590114052010(a)news.shawcable.com>, > alangbaker(a)telus.net says... > > > > In article <7n_Gn.6403$mi.2229(a)newsfe01.iad>, > > "Frank Ketchum" <nospam(a)thanksanyway.fu> wrote: > > > > > <bknight(a)conramp.net> wrote in message > > > news:l9rnu5dugg77jus2l08hs6ms20udi7bo9h(a)4ax.com... > > > > This should clear up one misconception here. > > > > > > > > The fourteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: > > > > > > > > > > > > ...Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property > > > > ...without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its > > > > jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. > > > > > > > > ...The Supreme Court has ruled that these provisions apply to all > > > > ...persons in the U.S., without regard to race, or nationality. > > > > ...Therefore, U.S. residents -- legal and illegal -- have > > > > ...constitutional rights such as equal protection of the law and the > > > > ...right to due process. > > > > > > > > > This is the same constitution wherein we have uncovered a right to abortion. > > > We don't take what the constitution actually says literally anymore. > > > > Your constitution makes it very clear on the subject of rights that it > > was never providing a definitive and exhaustive list of all the rights > > that people possess. > > > > > > > > Glad I had a chance to clear that up. > > > > You should try reading and understanding the document before you "clear" > > anything up about it. > > What rights are not codified in the US constitution as the US > constitution exists today? > > If you kill a pregnant mother you can be charged with two murders. > However, if you kill an unborn child, via abortion, you cannot be > charged with murder. What is the difference? The unborn child is dead > either way. > > I guess it is ok to kill unborn children because they cannot speak for > themselves. The vast majority are victims of convenience. -Greg
From: dene on 14 May 2010 12:45 "Alan Baker" <alangbaker(a)telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-656F4A.00591414052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > In article <MPG.265643159bd6602a989efa(a)news.giganews.com>, > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > In article <l9rnu5dugg77jus2l08hs6ms20udi7bo9h(a)4ax.com>, > > bknight(a)conramp.net says... > > > > > > This should clear up one misconception here. > > > > > > The fourteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: > > > > > > > > > ...Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property > > > ...without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its > > > jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. > > > > > > ...The Supreme Court has ruled that these provisions apply to all > > > ...persons in the U.S., without regard to race, or nationality. > > > ...Therefore, U.S. residents -- legal and illegal -- have > > > ...constitutional rights such as equal protection of the law and the > > > ...right to due process. > > > > There are exceptions. > > Such as? The personnel of an invading army. -Greg
From: John B. on 14 May 2010 13:47 On May 14, 12:45 pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: > "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message > > news:alangbaker-656F4A.00591414052010(a)news.shawcable.com... > > > > > > > In article <MPG.265643159bd6602a989...(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > In article <l9rnu5dugg77jus2l08hs6ms20udi7b...(a)4ax.com>, > > > bkni...(a)conramp.net says... > > > > > This should clear up one misconception here. > > > > > The fourteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: > > > > > ...Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property > > > > ...without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its > > > > jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. > > > > > ...The Supreme Court has ruled that these provisions apply to all > > > > ...persons in the U.S., without regard to race, or nationality. > > > > ...Therefore, U.S. residents -- legal and illegal -- have > > > > ...constitutional rights such as equal protection of the law and the > > > > ...right to due process. > > > > There are exceptions. > > > Such as? > > The personnel of an invading army. > > -Greg I think he's got you there, Alan.
From: bknight on 14 May 2010 14:25
On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:47:11 -0700 (PDT), "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On May 14, 12:45�pm, "dene" <d...(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >> "Alan Baker" <alangba...(a)telus.net> wrote in message >> >> news:alangbaker-656F4A.00591414052010(a)news.shawcable.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article <MPG.265643159bd6602a989...(a)news.giganews.com>, >> > �BAR <sc...(a)you.com> wrote: >> >> > > In article <l9rnu5dugg77jus2l08hs6ms20udi7b...(a)4ax.com>, >> > > bkni...(a)conramp.net says... >> >> > > > This should clear up one misconception here. >> >> > > > The fourteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: >> >> > > > ...Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property >> > > > ...without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its >> > > > jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. >> >> > > > ...The Supreme Court has ruled that these provisions apply to all >> > > > ...persons in the U.S., without regard to race, or nationality. >> > > > ...Therefore, U.S. residents -- legal and illegal -- have >> > > > ...constitutional rights such as equal protection of the law and the >> > > > ...right to due process. >> >> > > There are exceptions. >> >> > Such as? >> >> The personnel of an invading army. >> >> -Greg > >I think he's got you there, Alan. Then outer space aliens too I guess. BK |