From: bknight on
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:01:48 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr
<frostback2002(a)att.net> wrote:

>On Oct 19, 6:35�pm, "Kommienezuspadt" <NoS...(a)NoThanks.net> wrote:
>> <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message

>> > Well, at least Rob has the common sense not to overtly defend Guardian
>> > in this specific instance.
>>
>> > BK
>>
>> and he has the sense to vacate the thread after he has had his head handed
>> to him.
>
>Nothing to vacate. KNIT has no citations either, other than he says
>something appeared in the WT, I could pull any dis articulated
>statement I wanted from any newspaper and make any claim. My post and
>his are equivalent in that they say nothing.
>

>If he can post a link to an article that says what he says, it might
>be different.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/14/ny-insurance-company-tries-to-rid-itself-of-high-c//print/


>A million bucks to treat muscular dystrophy...in one
>year? Very odd to say the least.
>
>In any event, if that's the best lefties can come up with here, there
>isn't much to the left side of the argument.

Now what Rob, more spin?


BK
From: The Hammer on
On Oct 20, 12:01 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote:
> On Oct 19, 6:35 pm, "Kommienezuspadt" <NoS...(a)NoThanks.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > <bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:ftfpd5pqnig8774tmavfm4p1bsatg2id9g(a)4ax.com...
>
> > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:18:44 -0400, "Kommienezuspadt"
> > > <NoS...(a)NoThanks.net> wrote:
>
> > >><bkni...(a)conramp.net> wrote in message
> > >>news:osdpd5p99h6dvbm6bpbjfnusfkj40q28ln(a)4ax.com...
> > >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:11:31 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr
> > >>> <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > >>>>On Oct 19, 1:01 pm, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > >>>>state.edu> wrote:
> > >>>>> In article
> > >>>>> <8934936e-f090-4dd9-9841-693d307ef...(a)f10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > >>>>> Dinosaur_Sr <frostback2...(a)att.net> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> > Secondly. I heard the same company doled out $4 million to treat a
> > >>>>> > woman with a rare form of breast cancer when they didn't have to.
> > >>>>> > They
> > >>>>> > just comped it to her.
>
> > >>>>> But you don't have a cite for any of these urban legends, do you?
>
> > >>>>Oh, I'm sorry...The Washington Times reported that with respect to
> > >>>>"death panels", in the government plan an "office will be reserved for
> > >>>>people willing to recruit into the government-subsidized health care
> > >>>>system insurance companies that are willing to take money to take
> > >>>>human lives."
>
> > >>> A perfect example of non sequitur Rob. Spin, spin, spin when you have
> > >>> no answer.
>
> > >>> Now let's have the cite about what you said above.  You know, the $4
> > >>> million dole out.
>
> > >>> BK
>
> > >>expect crickets........
>
> > > Well, at least Rob has the common sense not to overtly defend Guardian
> > > in this specific instance.
>
> > > BK
>
> > and he has the sense to vacate the thread after he has had his head handed
> > to him.
>
> Nothing to vacate. KNIT has no citations either, other than he says
> something appeared in the WT, I could pull any dis articulated
> statement I wanted from any newspaper and make any claim. My post and
> his are equivalent in that they say nothing.
>
> If he can post a link to an article that says what he says, it might
> be different. A million bucks to treat muscular dystrophy...in one
> year? Very odd to say the least.
>
> In any event, if that's the best lefties can come up with here, there
> isn't much to the left side of the argument.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Rob, you are very right. Something seems very wrong with a million
dollars per year for treatment. Because there are sadly no miracle
drugs or treatments out there for MD as you well know. While
medicatons and treatments and sometimes even surgery can improve or
extend life, the overwhelming majoirity of care for long term MD
patients is custodial. A million dollars is a lot of money, maybe
there is more to this story then we know, and without knowing
Guardian's side of the argument , it was indeed a foolish post
because as you say it really says nothing. It tried to demonize
Guardian and the entire industry, all it did was embarass the OP.
From: dene on

"The Hammer" <GaGolfer2009(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:aa9ea127-5d5c-48b6-97cd-11eaa33544cd(a)31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...

Rob, you are very right. Something seems very wrong with a million
dollars per year for treatment. Because there are sadly no miracle
drugs or treatments out there for MD as you well know. While
medicatons and treatments and sometimes even surgery can improve or
extend life, the overwhelming majoirity of care for long term MD
patients is custodial. A million dollars is a lot of money, maybe
there is more to this story then we know, and without knowing
Guardian's side of the argument , it was indeed a foolish post
because as you say it really says nothing. It tried to demonize
Guardian and the entire industry, all it did was embarass the OP.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Knit's not embarrassed. He's too dense and obtuse to experience that.

-Greg


From: Clitlip on
On Oct 20 2009 3:09 PM, dene wrote:

> "The Hammer" <GaGolfer2009(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:aa9ea127-5d5c-48b6-97cd-11eaa33544cd(a)31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
>
> Rob, you are very right. Something seems very wrong with a million
> dollars per year for treatment. Because there are sadly no miracle
> drugs or treatments out there for MD as you well know. While
> medicatons and treatments and sometimes even surgery can improve or
> extend life, the overwhelming majoirity of care for long term MD
> patients is custodial. A million dollars is a lot of money, maybe
> there is more to this story then we know, and without knowing
> Guardian's side of the argument , it was indeed a foolish post
> because as you say it really says nothing. It tried to demonize
> Guardian and the entire industry, all it did was embarass the OP.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Knit's not embarrassed. He's too dense and obtuse to experience that.
>
> -Greg

Is it true that he is almost 80 years old? Maybe he don't even know to
be embarrassed. Maybe he don't even know what time it is!

____________________________________________________________________�
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com


From: William Clark on
In article <esf1r6xtab.ln2(a)recgroups.com>,
"Clitlip" <a80526c(a)webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> On Oct 20 2009 3:09 PM, dene wrote:
>
> > "The Hammer" <GaGolfer2009(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:aa9ea127-5d5c-48b6-97cd-11eaa33544cd(a)31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Rob, you are very right. Something seems very wrong with a million
> > dollars per year for treatment. Because there are sadly no miracle
> > drugs or treatments out there for MD as you well know. While
> > medicatons and treatments and sometimes even surgery can improve or
> > extend life, the overwhelming majoirity of care for long term MD
> > patients is custodial. A million dollars is a lot of money, maybe
> > there is more to this story then we know, and without knowing
> > Guardian's side of the argument , it was indeed a foolish post
> > because as you say it really says nothing. It tried to demonize
> > Guardian and the entire industry, all it did was embarass the OP.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Knit's not embarrassed. He's too dense and obtuse to experience that.
> >
> > -Greg
>
> Is it true that he is almost 80 years old? Maybe he don't even know to
> be embarrassed. Maybe he don't even know what time it is!
>
> ____________________________________________________________________�
> RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com

Like you "don't even know" how to write English.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prev: Health Care Bombshell - Thanks for reading
Next: New Group