From: William Clark on 15 Apr 2010 21:25 In article <82pf97Ff51U1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:9df142a5-6f3b-47d2-b5dc-0c67f744e494(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 15, 2:32 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> > wrote: > > On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 1:39 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 15, 10:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1- > > > > > >> b4e9-9cd696a4d...(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org: > > > > > > > >>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in > > > > > >>>> ways > > > > > >>>> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled > > > > > >>>> protest > > > > > >>>> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further distance > > > > > >>>> them > > > > > >>>> from mainstream America and damage the public's opinion of > > > > > >>>> them. We > > > > > >>>> will also use the inside information that we have gained in > > > > > >>>> order to > > > > > >>>> disrupt and derail their plans." > > > > > > > >>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the sign > > > > > >>>> man > > > > > >>>> did. > > > > > > > >>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a website. > > > > > >>> But > > > > > >>>you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch mob, I'm > > > > > >>>sure. > > > > > > > >> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would expect the > > > > > >> left > > > > > >> to stoop to. > > > > > > > > Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon. > > > > > > > It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on Facebook > > > > > and > > > > > over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are coming out of the > > > > > woodwork.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > 1,400 "loons" who don't like the tea party movement. So what? They > > > > haven't done anything. If the guy in Oregon does lead people in > > > > disrupting tea party rallies (such as the one going on right now in > > > > DC) and trying to deprive people of their right to free speech, I will > > > > joinyouin denouncing them. Until then, they are best ignored.- Hide > > > > quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Haven't done anything? What has you so convinced (besides your > > > political ideology) that they haven't been carrying signs with moronic > > > misspelled messages around and using "racist" epithets? > > > > Of course one could do the same thing at say global warming rallies, > > pose as supporters of say cap and trade, misspell signs, make > > offensive remarks...and they wouldn't really be doing anything...best > > to just let it go!- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Right. All the people who have been carrying racist and otherwise > offensive signs at tea party rallies are actually liberal plants. You > people amaze me. > > ======================= > It's EXACTLY something the left would do. Well, that settles it, then. All right wing rallies are simply plants of the left. How very convenient for you.
From: William Clark on 15 Apr 2010 21:26 In article <MPG.263159f0a1bbff11989de2(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-5E0FAD.16474115042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > > > Not only that, the results of a poll were just released that indicate > > > that the supporters of the TEA party movement are more highly educated > > > and earn more than the public at large. By the far-right leaning NY > > > Times no less :-) > > > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html > > > > But the public at large is not the block of Democratic, liberal voters, > > because a sizable chunk of the "public at large" does not participate at > > all in the political process. Clearly the Tea Parters are Republican, > > and older, since in spite of their animosity to Washington (read - > > having a black man as President), they want Social Security left alone. > > Tells you which demographic group they are form. > > Which party are you registered with to cast votes in Ohio? > > * Communist Party of Ohio > * Constitution Party of Ohio > * Green Party of Ohio > * Libertarian Party of Ohio > * Natural Law Party of Ohio > * Ohio Democratic Party > * Ohio Republican Party > * Reform Party of Ohio > * Socialist Workers Party of Ohio Bertie, have you been having an early TGIF today? This is bizarre, even for you.
From: Carbon on 15 Apr 2010 21:40 On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:52:42 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > news:4bc7a486$0$4987$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:56:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:4bc79392$0$4942$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:54:24 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >>>>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >>>>>>> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1- >>>>>>> b4e9-9cd696a4dd71(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in >>>>>>>>> ways which exaggerate their least appealing qualities >>>>>>>>> (misspelled protest signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) >>>>>>>>> to further distance them from mainstream America and damage >>>>>>>>> the public's opinion of them. We will also use the inside >>>>>>>>> information that we have gained in order to disrupt and derail >>>>>>>>> their plans." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the sign >>>>>>>>> man did. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a website. >>>>>>>> But you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch mob, >>>>>>>> I'm sure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would expect the >>>>>>> left to stoop to. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon. >>>>> >>>>> It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on >>>>> Facebook and over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are >>>>> coming out of the woodwork. >>>> >>>> People have pet cats with more friends and followers than that. >>>> It's a joke. >>> >>> This just one of several groups out there. And they all have to >>> start somewhere.... >> >> It's a joke. This is one (1) loon for chrissake. You guys need to >> relax. > > Of course. Now if it was the right.... If it was one idiot on the right it would be every bit as pathetic.
From: MNMikeW on 15 Apr 2010 22:25 "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-1800D5.21241415042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <82pc5bFsbkU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message >> news:clark-24ABC6.16412815042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> > In article <82onsaFrg3U1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in >> >> message >> >> news:clark-E06CB6.07593514042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> > In article <82la6qF56nU1(a)mid.individual.net>, >> >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:wclark2-21D39D.21152913042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > No, from where I see it, he is simply calling out a coward. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Of course you see it that way. You and him are of the same >> >> >> > > ilk. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > -Greg >> >> >> > >> >> >> > That, of course, should be "you and he" when they are the subject >> >> >> > of >> >> >> > the >> >> >> > sentence. Sigh. >> >> >> >> >> >> Zzzzzzzzzz........ >> >> >> >> >> >> -Greg >> >> > >> >> > Indeed, you clearly did sleep through English language classes. >> >> > Among >> >> > others :-) >> >> >> >> "God, I'd hat to have to make excuses someone like this." >> >> -William Clark >> > >> > You clearly have the same problem, in your case an inability to >> > distinguish between bad grammar and bad typing. >> >> Yes, its only YOU that has bad typing. > > I freely admit that. I can operate an electron microscope, but I never > learned how to touch type properly. Oh, well. School smart, street stupid as they say. ;-)
From: MNMikeW on 15 Apr 2010 22:27
"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:wclark2-499C08.21254115042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article <82pf97Ff51U1(a)mid.individual.net>, > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:9df142a5-6f3b-47d2-b5dc-0c67f744e494(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> On Apr 15, 2:32 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> >> wrote: >> > On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Apr 15, 1:39 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > On Apr 15, 10:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message >> > >> > > > >news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> > >> > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: >> > > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> > > > > >> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1- >> > > > > >> b4e9-9cd696a4d...(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... >> > > > > >>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > > >>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org: >> > >> > > > > >>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party >> > > > > >>>> in >> > > > > >>>> ways >> > > > > >>>> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled >> > > > > >>>> protest >> > > > > >>>> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further >> > > > > >>>> distance >> > > > > >>>> them >> > > > > >>>> from mainstream America and damage the public's opinion of >> > > > > >>>> them. We >> > > > > >>>> will also use the inside information that we have gained in >> > > > > >>>> order to >> > > > > >>>> disrupt and derail their plans." >> > >> > > > > >>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the >> > > > > >>>> sign >> > > > > >>>> man >> > > > > >>>> did. >> > >> > > > > >>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a >> > > > > >>> website. >> > > > > >>> But >> > > > > >>>you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch mob, I'm >> > > > > >>>sure. >> > >> > > > > >> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would expect >> > > > > >> the >> > > > > >> left >> > > > > >> to stoop to. >> > >> > > > > > Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon. >> > >> > > > > It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on >> > > > > and >> > > > > over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are coming out of >> > > > > the >> > > > > woodwork.- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > > > 1,400 "loons" who don't like the tea party movement. So what? They >> > > > haven't done anything. If the guy in Oregon does lead people in >> > > > disrupting tea party rallies (such as the one going on right now in >> > > > DC) and trying to deprive people of their right to free speech, I >> > > > will >> > > > joinyouin denouncing them. Until then, they are best ignored.- Hide >> > > > quoted text - >> > >> > > > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > > Haven't done anything? What has you so convinced (besides your >> > > political ideology) that they haven't been carrying signs with >> > > moronic >> > > misspelled messages around and using "racist" epithets? >> > >> > Of course one could do the same thing at say global warming rallies, >> > pose as supporters of say cap and trade, misspell signs, make >> > offensive remarks...and they wouldn't really be doing anything...best >> > to just let it go!- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> Right. All the people who have been carrying racist and otherwise >> offensive signs at tea party rallies are actually liberal plants. You >> people amaze me. >> >> ======================= >> It's EXACTLY something the left would do. > > Well, that settles it, then. All right wing rallies are simply plants of > the left. How very convenient for you. Uh, what? |