From: William Clark on
In article <82pf97Ff51U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:9df142a5-6f3b-47d2-b5dc-0c67f744e494(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 15, 2:32 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com>
> wrote:
> > On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 15, 1:39 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Apr 15, 10:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> >
> > > > >news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> >
> > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> > > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > >> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1-
> > > > > >> b4e9-9cd696a4d...(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > >>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > >>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org:
> >
> > > > > >>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in
> > > > > >>>> ways
> > > > > >>>> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled
> > > > > >>>> protest
> > > > > >>>> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further distance
> > > > > >>>> them
> > > > > >>>> from mainstream America and damage the public's opinion of
> > > > > >>>> them. We
> > > > > >>>> will also use the inside information that we have gained in
> > > > > >>>> order to
> > > > > >>>> disrupt and derail their plans."
> >
> > > > > >>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the sign
> > > > > >>>> man
> > > > > >>>> did.
> >
> > > > > >>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a website.
> > > > > >>> But
> > > > > >>>you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch mob, I'm
> > > > > >>>sure.
> >
> > > > > >> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would expect the
> > > > > >> left
> > > > > >> to stoop to.
> >
> > > > > > Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon.
> >
> > > > > It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on Facebook
> > > > > and
> > > > > over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are coming out of the
> > > > > woodwork.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > 1,400 "loons" who don't like the tea party movement. So what? They
> > > > haven't done anything. If the guy in Oregon does lead people in
> > > > disrupting tea party rallies (such as the one going on right now in
> > > > DC) and trying to deprive people of their right to free speech, I will
> > > > joinyouin denouncing them. Until then, they are best ignored.- Hide
> > > > quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > Haven't done anything? What has you so convinced (besides your
> > > political ideology) that they haven't been carrying signs with moronic
> > > misspelled messages around and using "racist" epithets?
> >
> > Of course one could do the same thing at say global warming rallies,
> > pose as supporters of say cap and trade, misspell signs, make
> > offensive remarks...and they wouldn't really be doing anything...best
> > to just let it go!- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Right. All the people who have been carrying racist and otherwise
> offensive signs at tea party rallies are actually liberal plants. You
> people amaze me.
>
> =======================
> It's EXACTLY something the left would do.

Well, that settles it, then. All right wing rallies are simply plants of
the left. How very convenient for you.
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.263159f0a1bbff11989de2(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <clark-5E0FAD.16474115042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> > >
> > > Not only that, the results of a poll were just released that indicate
> > > that the supporters of the TEA party movement are more highly educated
> > > and earn more than the public at large. By the far-right leaning NY
> > > Times no less :-)
> > >
> > > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html
> >
> > But the public at large is not the block of Democratic, liberal voters,
> > because a sizable chunk of the "public at large" does not participate at
> > all in the political process. Clearly the Tea Parters are Republican,
> > and older, since in spite of their animosity to Washington (read -
> > having a black man as President), they want Social Security left alone.
> > Tells you which demographic group they are form.
>
> Which party are you registered with to cast votes in Ohio?
>
> * Communist Party of Ohio
> * Constitution Party of Ohio
> * Green Party of Ohio
> * Libertarian Party of Ohio
> * Natural Law Party of Ohio
> * Ohio Democratic Party
> * Ohio Republican Party
> * Reform Party of Ohio
> * Socialist Workers Party of Ohio

Bertie, have you been having an early TGIF today? This is bizarre, even
for you.
From: Carbon on
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:52:42 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4bc7a486$0$4987$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:56:41 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4bc79392$0$4942$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:54:24 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>>> "Carbon" <nobrac(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>>>>>>> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1-
>>>>>>> b4e9-9cd696a4dd71(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in
>>>>>>>>> ways which exaggerate their least appealing qualities
>>>>>>>>> (misspelled protest signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.)
>>>>>>>>> to further distance them from mainstream America and damage
>>>>>>>>> the public's opinion of them. We will also use the inside
>>>>>>>>> information that we have gained in order to disrupt and derail
>>>>>>>>> their plans."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the sign
>>>>>>>>> man did.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a website.
>>>>>>>> But you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch mob,
>>>>>>>> I'm sure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would expect the
>>>>>>> left to stoop to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on
>>>>> Facebook and over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are
>>>>> coming out of the woodwork.
>>>>
>>>> People have pet cats with more friends and followers than that.
>>>> It's a joke.
>>>
>>> This just one of several groups out there. And they all have to
>>> start somewhere....
>>
>> It's a joke. This is one (1) loon for chrissake. You guys need to
>> relax.
>
> Of course. Now if it was the right....

If it was one idiot on the right it would be every bit as pathetic.
From: MNMikeW on

"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-1800D5.21241415042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <82pc5bFsbkU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
>> news:clark-24ABC6.16412815042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> > In article <82onsaFrg3U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> > "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in
>> >> message
>> >> news:clark-E06CB6.07593514042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> >> > In article <82la6qF56nU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
>> >> > "dene" <dene(a)remove.ipns.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:wclark2-21D39D.21152913042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > > > No, from where I see it, he is simply calling out a coward.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Of course you see it that way. You and him are of the same
>> >> >> > > ilk.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > -Greg
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > That, of course, should be "you and he" when they are the subject
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > sentence. Sigh.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Zzzzzzzzzz........
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Greg
>> >> >
>> >> > Indeed, you clearly did sleep through English language classes.
>> >> > Among
>> >> > others :-)
>> >>
>> >> "God, I'd hat to have to make excuses someone like this."
>> >> -William Clark
>> >
>> > You clearly have the same problem, in your case an inability to
>> > distinguish between bad grammar and bad typing.
>>
>> Yes, its only YOU that has bad typing.
>
> I freely admit that. I can operate an electron microscope, but I never
> learned how to touch type properly. Oh, well.

School smart, street stupid as they say. ;-)



From: MNMikeW on

"William Clark" <wclark2(a)colnospamumbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wclark2-499C08.21254115042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article <82pf97Ff51U1(a)mid.individual.net>,
> "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:9df142a5-6f3b-47d2-b5dc-0c67f744e494(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 15, 2:32 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Apr 15, 1:39 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > On Apr 15, 10:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > > > >news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
>> >
>> > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
>> > > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > > > > >> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1-
>> > > > > >> b4e9-9cd696a4d...(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > > >>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > >>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org:
>> >
>> > > > > >>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party
>> > > > > >>>> in
>> > > > > >>>> ways
>> > > > > >>>> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled
>> > > > > >>>> protest
>> > > > > >>>> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further
>> > > > > >>>> distance
>> > > > > >>>> them
>> > > > > >>>> from mainstream America and damage the public's opinion of
>> > > > > >>>> them. We
>> > > > > >>>> will also use the inside information that we have gained in
>> > > > > >>>> order to
>> > > > > >>>> disrupt and derail their plans."
>> >
>> > > > > >>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the
>> > > > > >>>> sign
>> > > > > >>>> man
>> > > > > >>>> did.
>> >
>> > > > > >>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a
>> > > > > >>> website.
>> > > > > >>> But
>> > > > > >>>you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch mob, I'm
>> > > > > >>>sure.
>> >
>> > > > > >> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would expect
>> > > > > >> the
>> > > > > >> left
>> > > > > >> to stoop to.
>> >
>> > > > > > Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon.
>> >
>> > > > > It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on
>> > > > > Facebook
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are coming out of
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > woodwork.- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > 1,400 "loons" who don't like the tea party movement. So what? They
>> > > > haven't done anything. If the guy in Oregon does lead people in
>> > > > disrupting tea party rallies (such as the one going on right now in
>> > > > DC) and trying to deprive people of their right to free speech, I
>> > > > will
>> > > > joinyouin denouncing them. Until then, they are best ignored.- Hide
>> > > > quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > > Haven't done anything? What has you so convinced (besides your
>> > > political ideology) that they haven't been carrying signs with
>> > > moronic
>> > > misspelled messages around and using "racist" epithets?
>> >
>> > Of course one could do the same thing at say global warming rallies,
>> > pose as supporters of say cap and trade, misspell signs, make
>> > offensive remarks...and they wouldn't really be doing anything...best
>> > to just let it go!- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Right. All the people who have been carrying racist and otherwise
>> offensive signs at tea party rallies are actually liberal plants. You
>> people amaze me.
>>
>> =======================
>> It's EXACTLY something the left would do.
>
> Well, that settles it, then. All right wing rallies are simply plants of
> the left. How very convenient for you.

Uh, what?