From: William Clark on 16 Apr 2010 13:45 In article <MPG.263266cbb95fec20989de9(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <a158e229-7b36-4cab-9adf-e40360d9d5a8 > @k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is > > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration > > > a "racist". If you recall, all of the stink raised by the > > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of > > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations > > > (spitting). > > > > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs > > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and > > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were. > > > > > > Either prove this assertion or stop making it. > > You would dismiss the proof so why bother. You don't have any, so why bother?
From: William Clark on 16 Apr 2010 13:45 In article <b2601925-d9b0-4711-a89d-d122902d809a(a)z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, The Bogeyman <thbgymn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 1:07�pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 16, 12:58�pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 11:23�am, "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said: > > > > > > > On Apr 13, 8:17�am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- > > > > > state.edu> wrote: > > > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, > > > > > > >> �"R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. �They don't show them there. > > > > >>> �Doesn't > > > > >>> fit their narrative. > > > > > > >>> Randy > > > > > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally > > > > >> illiterate, too. > > > > > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image > > > > >>popup.php?image=29216... > > > > >> mage id=1- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to > > > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal > > > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners > > > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat > > > > > of > > > > > violence. > > > > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the > > > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using > > > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the > > > > > concept of nuance. > > > > > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk didn't > > > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man into > > > > the White House. �Is that whatyouwould have us believe? > > > > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is > > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration > > > a "racist". Ifyourecall, all of the stink raised by the > > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of > > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations > > > (spitting). > > > > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs > > > > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and > > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were. > > > > Either prove this assertion or stop making it.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Is photographic evidence enough for you, or were these photoshopped? > > http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/ > > This time they were busted only because the tea partiers were tipped > off beforehand. Who knows how long it had been going on before they > were exposed by the cable news outlets. > > I could swear someone already posted this link. Are you in denial? "Michelle Malkin"? Give me peace.
From: William Clark on 16 Apr 2010 13:46 In article <82rdn4F1cvU1(a)mid.individual.net>, "MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote: > "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:f55c1a26-d297-4bc0-b5a1-9cc93540fec1(a)q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 15, 10:50 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:054333ff-586d-48c6-91b8-537ac67eae85(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... > > On Apr 15, 7:30 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >news:69e8eff9-d49a-4e27-9c4c-d52ab369821a(a)u22g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... > > > On Apr 15, 5:37 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >news:9df142a5-6f3b-47d2-b5dc-0c67f744e494(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > > > On Apr 15, 2:32 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 1:39 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 10:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > > > >news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote: > > > > > > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > > >> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1- > > > > > > > > >> b4e9-9cd696a4d...(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > >>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org: > > > > > > > > > > >>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea > > > > > > > > >>>> Party > > > > > > > > >>>> in > > > > > > > > >>>> ways > > > > > > > > >>>> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities > > > > > > > > >>>> (misspelled > > > > > > > > >>>> protest > > > > > > > > >>>> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further > > > > > > > > >>>> distance > > > > > > > > >>>> them > > > > > > > > >>>> from mainstream America and damage the public's opinion > > > > > > > > >>>> of > > > > > > > > >>>> them. We > > > > > > > > >>>> will also use the inside information that we have gained > > > > > > > > >>>> in > > > > > > > > >>>> order to > > > > > > > > >>>> disrupt and derail their plans." > > > > > > > > > > >>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the > > > > > > > > >>>> sign > > > > > > > > >>>> man > > > > > > > > >>>> did. > > > > > > > > > > >>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a > > > > > > > > >>> website. > > > > > > > > >>> But > > > > > > > > >>>you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch mob, > > > > > > > > >>>I'm > > > > > > > > >>>sure. > > > > > > > > > > >> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would expect > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > >> left > > > > > > > > >> to stoop to. > > > > > > > > > > > Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon. > > > > > > > > > > It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are coming out > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > woodwork.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > 1,400 "loons" who don't like the tea party movement. So what? > > > > > > > They > > > > > > > haven't done anything. If the guy in Oregon does lead people in > > > > > > > disrupting tea party rallies (such as the one going on right now > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > DC) and trying to deprive people of their right to free speech, > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > joinyouin denouncing them. Until then, they are best ignored.- > > > > > > > Hide > > > > > > > quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Haven't done anything? What has you so convinced (besides your > > > > > > political ideology) that they haven't been carrying signs with > > > > > > moronic > > > > > > misspelled messages around and using "racist" epithets? > > > > > > > Of course one could do the same thing at say global warming rallies, > > > > > pose as supporters of say cap and trade, misspell signs, make > > > > > offensive remarks...and they wouldn't really be doing > > > > > anything...best > > > > > to just let it go!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Right. All the people who have been carrying racist and otherwise > > > > offensive signs at tea party rallies are actually liberal plants. You > > > > people amaze me. > > > > > > ======================= > > > > It's EXACTLY something the left would do.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > As a member of what you call "the left" I can say I've never heard of > > > anybody doing that or talking about doing it. > > > > > ======================================= > > > Of course that means it never happens right. > > > > Well, you're certainly welcome to provide some evidence that it does. > > > > =============================== > > > > True. We'll see what tomorrow brings.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Here's the Fox News story about yesterday's TP rally in DC. > Apparently, no left-wing infiltrators were present. > > http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/15/tea-party-protesters-descend-dc-new > -contract-america/ > > > ================ > > There was at least one. > > http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/ Michelle Malking - wow, there is a truly reliable and unbiased source.
From: William Clark on 16 Apr 2010 13:47 In article <MPG.26324baecc5f180b989de8(a)news.giganews.com>, BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > In article <clark-B0CE5E.11033716042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > In article <MPG.26323c55bf80b00f989de7(a)news.giganews.com>, > > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <hq9qmi$90j$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, no_spam_(a)no_mail.com > > > says... > > > > > > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message > > > > news:MPG.263159f0a1bbff11989de2(a)news.giganews.com... > > > > > In article <clark-5E0FAD.16474115042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio- > > > > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says... > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Not only that, the results of a poll were just released that > > > > >> > indicate > > > > >> > that the supporters of the TEA party movement are more highly > > > > >> > educated > > > > >> > and earn more than the public at large. By the far-right leaning > > > > >> > NY > > > > >> > Times no less :-) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html > > > > >> > > > > >> But the public at large is not the block of Democratic, liberal > > > > >> voters, > > > > >> because a sizable chunk of the "public at large" does not > > > > >> participate at > > > > >> all in the political process. Clearly the Tea Parters are > > > > >> Republican, > > > > >> and older, since in spite of their animosity to Washington (read - > > > > >> having a black man as President), they want Social Security left > > > > >> alone. > > > > >> Tells you which demographic group they are form. > > > > > > > > > > Which party are you registered with to cast votes in Ohio? > > > > > > > > > > * Communist Party of Ohio > > > > > * Constitution Party of Ohio > > > > > * Green Party of Ohio > > > > > * Libertarian Party of Ohio > > > > > * Natural Law Party of Ohio > > > > > * Ohio Democratic Party > > > > > * Ohio Republican Party > > > > > * Reform Party of Ohio > > > > > * Socialist Workers Party of Ohio > > > > > > > > Clark isn't a US citizen. > > > > > > I am waiting for him to show up on "Cops" some night and then next we > > > will hear about him being deported back to the motherland. > > > > Don't hold your breath. > > You are the high strung type who is easily set off and argumentative. Really? Prove it (as opposed to someone who enjoys winding up wingnut idiocy).
From: MNMikeW on 16 Apr 2010 13:52
"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message news:clark-0CA617.13455316042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu... > In article > <b2601925-d9b0-4711-a89d-d122902d809a(a)z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, > The Bogeyman <thbgymn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Apr 16, 12:58 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Apr 16, 11:23 am, "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said: >> > >> > > > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio- >> > > > > state.edu> wrote: >> > > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>, >> > >> > > > >> "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote: >> > >> > > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there. >> > > > >>> Doesn't >> > > > >>> fit their narrative. >> > >> > > > >>> Randy >> > >> > > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is >> > > > >> functionally >> > > > >> illiterate, too. >> > >> > > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image >> > > > >>popup.php?image=29216... >> > > > >> mage id=1- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to >> > > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal >> > > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation >> > > > > owners >> > > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the >> > > > > threat >> > > > > of >> > > > > violence. >> > >> > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the >> > > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person >> > > > > using >> > > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the >> > > > > concept of nuance. >> > >> > > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk >> > > > didn't >> > > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man >> > > > into >> > > > the White House. Is that whatyouwould have us believe? >> > >> > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty >> > > is >> > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration >> > > a "racist". Ifyourecall, all of the stink raised by the >> > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of >> > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations >> > > (spitting). >> > >> > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs >> > >> > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and >> > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were. >> > >> > Either prove this assertion or stop making it.- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> Is photographic evidence enough for you, or were these photoshopped? >> >> http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/ >> >> This time they were busted only because the tea partiers were tipped >> off beforehand. Who knows how long it had been going on before they >> were exposed by the cable news outlets. >> >> I could swear someone already posted this link. Are you in denial? > > "Michelle Malkin"? Give me peace. Pretty rich coming from a guy who recently posted a source from "Wonkette". Your hypocrisy is astounding. |