From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.263266cbb95fec20989de9(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <a158e229-7b36-4cab-9adf-e40360d9d5a8
> @k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, johnb505(a)gmail.com says...
> > >
> > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is
> > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
> > > a "racist". If you recall, all of the stink raised by the
> > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
> > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
> > > (spitting).
> >
> > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
> > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
> > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.
> >
> >
> > Either prove this assertion or stop making it.
>
> You would dismiss the proof so why bother.

You don't have any, so why bother?
From: William Clark on
In article
<b2601925-d9b0-4711-a89d-d122902d809a(a)z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
The Bogeyman <thbgymn(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 16, 1:07�pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 12:58�pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 16, 11:23�am, "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said:
> >
> > > > > On Apr 13, 8:17�am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
> > > > > state.edu> wrote:
> > > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
> >
> > > > >> �"R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. �They don't show them there.
> > > > >>> �Doesn't
> > > > >>> fit their narrative.
> >
> > > > >>> Randy
> >
> > > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is functionally
> > > > >> illiterate, too.
> >
> > > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image
> > > > >>popup.php?image=29216...
> > > > >> mage id=1- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
> > > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
> > > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation owners
> > > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the threat
> > > > > of
> > > > > violence.
> >
> > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the
> > > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person using
> > > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
> > > > > concept of nuance.
> >
> > > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk didn't
> > > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man into
> > > > the White House. �Is that whatyouwould have us believe?
> >
> > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty is
> > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
> > > a "racist". Ifyourecall, all of the stink raised by the
> > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
> > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
> > > (spitting).
> >
> > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
> >
> > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
> > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.
> >
> > Either prove this assertion or stop making it.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Is photographic evidence enough for you, or were these photoshopped?
>
> http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/
>
> This time they were busted only because the tea partiers were tipped
> off beforehand. Who knows how long it had been going on before they
> were exposed by the cable news outlets.
>
> I could swear someone already posted this link. Are you in denial?

"Michelle Malkin"? Give me peace.
From: William Clark on
In article <82rdn4F1cvU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
"MNMikeW" <MNMiikkew(a)aol.com> wrote:

> "John B." <johnb505(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:f55c1a26-d297-4bc0-b5a1-9cc93540fec1(a)q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 15, 10:50 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:054333ff-586d-48c6-91b8-537ac67eae85(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 15, 7:30 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > >news:69e8eff9-d49a-4e27-9c4c-d52ab369821a(a)u22g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Apr 15, 5:37 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > > >news:9df142a5-6f3b-47d2-b5dc-0c67f744e494(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Apr 15, 2:32 pm, Dinosaur_Sr <frostb...(a)dukesofbiohazard.com>
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Apr 15, 2:03 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Apr 15, 1:39 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Apr 15, 10:54 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > "Carbon" <nob...(a)nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > > >news:4bc50040$0$5034$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com...
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:39:31 -0500, MNMikeW wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > >> news:b1d3e9da-12ac-4ff1-
> > > > > > > > >> b4e9-9cd696a4d...(a)k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > > > >>> On Apr 13, 2:34 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > >>>> Straight from crashtheteaparty.org:
> >
> > > > > > > > >>>> "Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea
> > > > > > > > >>>> Party
> > > > > > > > >>>> in
> > > > > > > > >>>> ways
> > > > > > > > >>>> which exaggerate their least appealing qualities
> > > > > > > > >>>> (misspelled
> > > > > > > > >>>> protest
> > > > > > > > >>>> signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further
> > > > > > > > >>>> distance
> > > > > > > > >>>> them
> > > > > > > > >>>> from mainstream America and damage the public's opinion
> > > > > > > > >>>> of
> > > > > > > > >>>> them. We
> > > > > > > > >>>> will also use the inside information that we have gained
> > > > > > > > >>>> in
> > > > > > > > >>>> order to
> > > > > > > > >>>> disrupt and derail their plans."
> >
> > > > > > > > >>>> I don't know, to me it looks like that's exactly what the
> > > > > > > > >>>> sign
> > > > > > > > >>>> man
> > > > > > > > >>>> did.
> >
> > > > > > > > >>> I doubt that crashtheteaparty is anything more than a
> > > > > > > > >>> website.
> > > > > > > > >>> But
> > > > > > > > >>>you'll keep trying to depict it as some kind of lynch mob,
> > > > > > > > >>>I'm
> > > > > > > > >>>sure.
> >
> > > > > > > > >> That is exactly what it is. And exactly what I would expect
> > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > >> left
> > > > > > > > >> to stoop to.
> >
> > > > > > > > > Mike, read the article. It's the work of one loon.
> >
> > > > > > > > It was started by one loon. And he's up to 1000+ friends on
> > > > > > > > Facebook
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > over 400 "followers" on Twitter. So the loons are coming out
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > woodwork.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > 1,400 "loons" who don't like the tea party movement. So what?
> > > > > > > They
> > > > > > > haven't done anything. If the guy in Oregon does lead people in
> > > > > > > disrupting tea party rallies (such as the one going on right now
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > DC) and trying to deprive people of their right to free speech,
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > joinyouin denouncing them. Until then, they are best ignored.-
> > > > > > > Hide
> > > > > > > quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > Haven't done anything? What has you so convinced (besides your
> > > > > > political ideology) that they haven't been carrying signs with
> > > > > > moronic
> > > > > > misspelled messages around and using "racist" epithets?
> >
> > > > > Of course one could do the same thing at say global warming rallies,
> > > > > pose as supporters of say cap and trade, misspell signs, make
> > > > > offensive remarks...and they wouldn't really be doing
> > > > > anything...best
> > > > > to just let it go!- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > Right. All the people who have been carrying racist and otherwise
> > > > offensive signs at tea party rallies are actually liberal plants. You
> > > > people amaze me.
> >
> > > > =======================
> > > > It's EXACTLY something the left would do.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > As a member of what you call "the left" I can say I've never heard of
> > > anybody doing that or talking about doing it.
> >
> > > =======================================
> > > Of course that means it never happens right.
> >
> > Well, you're certainly welcome to provide some evidence that it does.
> >
> > ===============================
> >
> > True. We'll see what tomorrow brings.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Here's the Fox News story about yesterday's TP rally in DC.
> Apparently, no left-wing infiltrators were present.
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/15/tea-party-protesters-descend-dc-new
> -contract-america/
>
>
> ================
>
> There was at least one.
>
> http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/

Michelle Malking - wow, there is a truly reliable and unbiased source.
From: William Clark on
In article <MPG.26324baecc5f180b989de8(a)news.giganews.com>,
BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:

> In article <clark-B0CE5E.11033716042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> >
> > In article <MPG.26323c55bf80b00f989de7(a)news.giganews.com>,
> > BAR <screw(a)you.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <hq9qmi$90j$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>, no_spam_(a)no_mail.com
> > > says...
> > > >
> > > > "BAR" <screw(a)you.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:MPG.263159f0a1bbff11989de2(a)news.giganews.com...
> > > > > In article <clark-5E0FAD.16474115042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-
> > > > > state.edu>, clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu says...
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Not only that, the results of a poll were just released that
> > > > >> > indicate
> > > > >> > that the supporters of the TEA party movement are more highly
> > > > >> > educated
> > > > >> > and earn more than the public at large. By the far-right leaning
> > > > >> > NY
> > > > >> > Times no less :-)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >> But the public at large is not the block of Democratic, liberal
> > > > >> voters,
> > > > >> because a sizable chunk of the "public at large" does not
> > > > >> participate at
> > > > >> all in the political process. Clearly the Tea Parters are
> > > > >> Republican,
> > > > >> and older, since in spite of their animosity to Washington (read -
> > > > >> having a black man as President), they want Social Security left
> > > > >> alone.
> > > > >> Tells you which demographic group they are form.
> > > > >
> > > > > Which party are you registered with to cast votes in Ohio?
> > > > >
> > > > > * Communist Party of Ohio
> > > > > * Constitution Party of Ohio
> > > > > * Green Party of Ohio
> > > > > * Libertarian Party of Ohio
> > > > > * Natural Law Party of Ohio
> > > > > * Ohio Democratic Party
> > > > > * Ohio Republican Party
> > > > > * Reform Party of Ohio
> > > > > * Socialist Workers Party of Ohio
> > > >
> > > > Clark isn't a US citizen.
> > >
> > > I am waiting for him to show up on "Cops" some night and then next we
> > > will hear about him being deported back to the motherland.
> >
> > Don't hold your breath.
>
> You are the high strung type who is easily set off and argumentative.

Really? Prove it (as opposed to someone who enjoys winding up wingnut
idiocy).
From: MNMikeW on

"William Clark" <clark(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:clark-0CA617.13455316042010(a)charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> In article
> <b2601925-d9b0-4711-a89d-d122902d809a(a)z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> The Bogeyman <thbgymn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 16, 1:07 pm, "John B." <johnb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Apr 16, 12:58 pm, The Bogeyman <thbg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Apr 16, 11:23 am, "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > On 2010-04-13 09:26:01 -0400, The Bogeyman said:
>> >
>> > > > > On Apr 13, 8:17 am, William Clark <cl...(a)nospam.matsceng.ohio-
>> > > > > state.edu> wrote:
>> > > > >> In article <201004121801001867-noneofyourbusiness(a)allcom>,
>> >
>> > > > >> "R&B" <none of your busin...(a)all.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > >>> Youwon't see them on FOX NEWS. They don't show them there.
>> > > > >>> Doesn't
>> > > > >>> fit their narrative.
>> >
>> > > > >>> Randy
>> >
>> > > > >> Here's one for starters. No surprise that the guy is
>> > > > >> functionally
>> > > > >> illiterate, too.
>> >
>> > > > >>http://www.groundreport.com/includes/ajax/image
>> > > > >>popup.php?image=29216...
>> > > > >> mage id=1- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > > How is that "racist" when he is obviously applying the word to
>> > > > > himself? It is just a crude way of comparing what the federal
>> > > > > government does to taxpayers to what the antebellum plantation
>> > > > > owners
>> > > > > did to the slaves, i.e. profiting from their labor under the
>> > > > > threat
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > violence.
>> >
>> > > > > A word in an of itself is not "racist",youhave to consider the
>> > > > > context in which it is being used and the intent of the person
>> > > > > using
>> > > > > it. And I thought the self-labelled "progressives" understood the
>> > > > > concept of nuance.
>> >
>> > > > So I guess it's just a coincidence that all this "ni**ger" talk
>> > > > didn't
>> > > > boil over into the public square until America voted a black man
>> > > > into
>> > > > the White House. Is that whatyouwould have us believe?
>> >
>> > > What "ni**er" talk? The only time I ever hear it is when some lefty
>> > > is
>> > > accusing anyone who disagrees with the policies of the administration
>> > > a "racist". Ifyourecall, all of the stink raised by the
>> > > congressional black caucus members who walked through the crowd of
>> > > protestors turned out to be lies (n-word) and exaggerations
>> > > (spitting).
>> >
>> > And with what has come to light about the tactics the libs
>> >
>> > > are using to infiltrate the tea parties and display offensive and
>> > > misspelled placards no one can say what the motives were.
>> >
>> > Either prove this assertion or stop making it.- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Is photographic evidence enough for you, or were these photoshopped?
>>
>> http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/15/crashers-they-came-they-saw-they-failed/
>>
>> This time they were busted only because the tea partiers were tipped
>> off beforehand. Who knows how long it had been going on before they
>> were exposed by the cable news outlets.
>>
>> I could swear someone already posted this link. Are you in denial?
>
> "Michelle Malkin"? Give me peace.

Pretty rich coming from a guy who recently posted a source from "Wonkette".
Your hypocrisy is astounding.